Review
The determination of neuronal fate in the cerebral cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(89)90041-6Get rights and content

Abstract

During the embryonic development of the cerebral cortex, young neurons migrate out into characteristic laminar positions and form specific axonal connections with other neurons. The birthdate of a neuron, and its tangential location in the ventricular zone, can serve as markers that predict its normal laminar fate and pattern of connectivity. In order to test whether cells of the developing cerebral cortex are committed to their normal fates, several types of transplantation experiment have challenged young cortical neurons to alter their identities or connections in novel environments. Other recent experiments have employed retroviral vectors to trace neuronal lineages in the cortex. Together, these studies suggest that phenotypic commitment involves a series of decisions. Certain developmental restrictions - for example, commitment to a laminar identity - may occur at or around the time of the cell's final mitotic division, whereas the refinement of area-specific axonal projections occurs as the neuron differentiates within the cortex.

References (37)

  • C.Q. Doe et al.

    Dev. Biol.

    (1985)
  • D.F. Ready

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • M.B. Luskin et al.

    Neuron

    (1988)
  • M. Westerfield et al.

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1988)
  • S.K. McConnell

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (1988)
  • V.S. Caviness

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • M.C. Pinto Lord et al.

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • M.W. Miller

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • D.D.M. O'Leary et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • I.G. Thong et al.

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1986)
  • G.R. Delong

    Dev. Biol.

    (1970)
  • C. Kenyon

    Science

    (1988)
  • H. Heasman et al.

    Cell

    (1984)
  • C.B. Kimmel et al.

    Science

    (1986)
  • C. Walsh et al.

    Science

    (1988)
  • J. Price et al.

    Development

    (1988)
  • J.Y. Kuwada

    Science

    (1986)
  • D.H. Hubel et al.
  • Cited by (101)

    • NeuroGT: A brain atlas of neurogenic tagging CreER drivers for birthdate-based classification and manipulation of mouse neurons

      2021, Cell Reports Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mounting evidence shows that neurogenic timing, which is often referred to as the neuronal birthdate, has immense impacts on neuronal phenotypes. In the neocortex, the birthdate determines layer positioning, connection patterns, and molecular and physiological properties of neurons (McConnell, 1989; Lodato and Arlotta, 2015). The chronological specification of neuronal fates is not a unique property of the neocortex but rather a generally conserved strategy in various nervous systems for generating neuronal diversity (Suzuki and Hirata, 2013).

    • The regulation of cortical neurogenesis

      2021, Current Topics in Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The basis for our mechanistic understanding of this process lies on pioneering studies by Susan McConnell using cell transplantation strategies in developing ferrets (McConnell, 1985). By taking neural progenitor cells from the cortical primordium of one embryo, labeling them and transplanting into an embryo of a different developmental stage, she demonstrated that at each age cortical progenitor cells are imprinted with an intrinsic program to heavily bias neuron production to only one layer (McConnell, 1988; McConnell, 1989; McConnell & Kaznowski, 1991). Intriguingly, progenitor cells transplanted while in S-phase of the cell cycle change the fate of their daughter neurons to that of those being born in the host embryo.

    • Development of the Nervous System

      2018, Fundamental Neuroscience for Basic and Clinical Applications: Fifth Edition
    • Developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization restricts neural progenitor competence in Drosophila

      2013, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Progressive loss of competence has been well characterized in mammalian and insect neural progenitors, in which single progenitors make an ordered series of distinct neural progeny (reviewed in Cepko et al., 1996; Kwan et al., 2012; Pearson and Doe, 2004; Sousa-Nunes et al., 2010). For example, mammalian neural progenitors have an early competence window to generate neuronal subtypes and a later competence window to generate glia (reviewed in McConnell, 1989; Okano and Temple, 2009). Yet virtually nothing is known about how competence is regulated in any mammalian or insect progenitor cell lineage.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text