Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 26, Issue 11, 1986, Pages 1815-1824
Vision Research

Dependence of visual suppression on the amplitudes of saccades and blinks

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(86)90133-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Visual suppression accompanying voluntary saccades and eyeblinks was measured for a range of amplitudes of both. Saccade amplitudes varied from 2 to 32° and blink amplitudes varied from a slight movement to a full closure of the eye. In every case, thresholds for detecting full-field luminance decrements were determined with the method of constant stimuli and a two alternative forced choice procedure. Results from three subjects show a monotonic increase in the amount of suppression produced by saccades and blinks of increasing amplitude. Data are discussed with respect to theories about the origin of visual suppression.

References (23)

  • HelmholtzH. von
  • Cited by (56)

    • All is not lost: Post-saccadic contributions to the perceptual omission of intra-saccadic streaks

      2018, Consciousness and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      There were no interactions between distractor location and distractor timing, nor was there a three-way interaction between target duration and distraction location and timing. An additional analysis was conducted to ensure that the differences in performance observed over experimental conditions could not have been mediated by differences in saccade amplitude (Stevenson, Volkmann, Kelly, & Riggs, 1986). First, summary statistics confirmed that average saccade amplitudes differed very little over the conditions (mean amplitude was 17.76°, SD = 1.5°, with means in each distractor condition ranging from 17.51° to 17.79°).

    • Investigating attention in complex visual search

      2015, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contrary to what might be expected, accuracy of saccade targeting to task-relevant stimuli is not a simple function of stimulus discriminability; this is shown by the fact that the bias towards task-relevant stimuli was lowest near the fovea where discriminability ought to be greatest, increasing smoothly towards the periphery (Fig. 5). At first glance, this result may seem paradoxical, but given that the costs of generating a saccade, in metabolic terms and in the degree and duration of the visual disruption, are bound to scale with amplitude (Stevenson, Volkmann, Kelly, & Riggs, 1986), this finding might plausibly be explained by a higher threshold of certainty about the target identity, which needs to be overcome to trigger larger amplitude saccades. It therefore points towards an evaluation of biological cost in target selection during visual search, which also accords with the large bias towards targets near the fovea (Fig. 4).

    • Spontaneous eyeblink activity

      2011, Ocular Surface
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another approach is to examine the lid excursion in sequential frames of an eyeblink videotape. With normal or high-speed cameras, the lid position is measured frame-by-frame in millimeters in order to quantify the final amplitude of the movement.21,28,42 As pointed out by Evinger, the upper lid margin movement during a blink is not represented by a vertical translation only.13

    • Compression of time during smooth pursuit eye movements

      2010, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The average amplitude of the catch-up saccades was very small and equal to 1.37 deg (SD 0.53). Given that most of the saccade effects scale with saccade amplitude (Mitrani, Yakimoff, & Mateeff, 1970; Ridder & Tomlinson, 1997; Stevenson, Volkmann, Kelly, & Riggs, 1986; Van Wetter & Van Opstal, 2008), we would not expect a large compression due to the catch-up saccades. It has been suggested that there is a mental time line which associates past and short intervals with left space and future and long intervals with right space (see Oliveri, Koch, & Caltagirone, 2009 for a review).

    • Frontal eye field signals that may trigger the brainstem saccade generator

      2008, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This step-like, position-altering mechanism is usually thought to be robust in assuring a single movement that finishes near the target. Since vision is degraded during saccades, a single-step arrangement and not multiple steps would optimize visual performance (Stevenson et al., 1986). However, a number of clinical studies have demonstrated that in some pathological states the burst generator loses its robust pulsatile drive.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts.

    View full text