Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 30, Issue 6, June 1992, Pages 515-526
Neuropsychologia

To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(92)90055-QGet rights and content

Abstract

Normal adults were tested in a series of three experiments to examine the influences of spatial location and cueing upon line bisection judgements. Judgements in all three experiments were strongly influenced by cueing with a letter at one or other end of the line. The spatial location of the line (in left, central or right body space) also had a minor effect in Experiments 1 and 2, where evidence was additionally found for a small constant error when lines were presented centrally. It is argued from the results of Experiments 2 and 3, where no explicit bisection response was required, that perceptual/attentional factors, rather than an orienting bias, play the major role in mediating the cueing effect. It is concluded that there is a substantial attentional effect upon judgements of extent, whereby paying less attention decreases perceived relative line length. However the constant error and the effect of spatial location, whilst mainly perceptual in nature, may also be partly determined by premotor orienting biases caused by differential hemispheric activation.

Cited by (285)

  • Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy

    2022, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Exploring the time-course and the reference frames of adaptation to optical prisms and its aftereffects

    2021, Cortex
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similar effects in healthy participants are found with both manual and perceptual (the Landmark task, see Milner, Harvey, Roberts, & Forster, 1993; Vossel, Eschenbeck, Weiss, & Fink, 2010) line bisection (Michel & Cruz, 2015; Michel et al., 2003). Interestingly, Striemer, Russell, and Nath (2016) found in young healthy participants that directional changes in straight-ahead pointing (rightward AEs of PA to leftward deviating prisms) are positively correlated with changes in performance in a manual line bisection task, but not in the Landmark task, that requires a perceptual judgement (Milner, Brechmann, & Pagliarini, 1992; Striemer & Danckert, 2010a). These findings indicate that the AEs of PA affect the participants’ performance in tasks requiring a manual response, as line bisection using the hand, as compared to tasks that require a perceptual judgement, as the Landmark task.

  • Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation

    2021, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Perceptual line bisection prioritizes the perceptual, and minimizes the motor, component of visuospatial bias by asking participants to judge a series of pre-bisected lines instead of actively bisecting them. We used a modified version of the Landmark task (Milner et al., 1992). The task consisted of 66 white, pre-bisected, lines (350 mm x ~2 mm) displayed on a black screen positioned 35 cm from the eyes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text