To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects
References (22)
- et al.
Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task
Neuropsychologia
(1980) - et al.
Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects
Neuropsychologia
(1985) - et al.
Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection?
Neuropsychologia
(1987) - et al.
The relationships between disorders of visual perception and unilateral spatial neglect
Neuropsychologia
(1971) Mechanisms of unilateral neglect
- et al.
Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect
Neuropsychologia
(1990) - et al.
When right goes left: An investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect
Cortex
(1989) - et al.
Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect
Brain Cognit.
(1989) - et al.
Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection
Neuropsychologia
(1990) - et al.
Hemispheric control of spatial attention
Brain Cognit.
(1990)
The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect
Neuropsychologia
Cited by (285)
Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy
2022, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyRevisiting the attentional bias in the split brain
2021, NeuropsychologiaExploring the time-course and the reference frames of adaptation to optical prisms and its aftereffects
2021, CortexCitation Excerpt :Similar effects in healthy participants are found with both manual and perceptual (the Landmark task, see Milner, Harvey, Roberts, & Forster, 1993; Vossel, Eschenbeck, Weiss, & Fink, 2010) line bisection (Michel & Cruz, 2015; Michel et al., 2003). Interestingly, Striemer, Russell, and Nath (2016) found in young healthy participants that directional changes in straight-ahead pointing (rightward AEs of PA to leftward deviating prisms) are positively correlated with changes in performance in a manual line bisection task, but not in the Landmark task, that requires a perceptual judgement (Milner, Brechmann, & Pagliarini, 1992; Striemer & Danckert, 2010a). These findings indicate that the AEs of PA affect the participants’ performance in tasks requiring a manual response, as line bisection using the hand, as compared to tasks that require a perceptual judgement, as the Landmark task.
Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation
2021, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Perceptual line bisection prioritizes the perceptual, and minimizes the motor, component of visuospatial bias by asking participants to judge a series of pre-bisected lines instead of actively bisecting them. We used a modified version of the Landmark task (Milner et al., 1992). The task consisted of 66 white, pre-bisected, lines (350 mm x ~2 mm) displayed on a black screen positioned 35 cm from the eyes.