Two components of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials evoked in hypoglossal motoneurons by lingual nerve stimulation
References (14)
The depression of spinal inhibition by electrophoretically administered strychnine
Int. J. Neuropharmacol.
(1962)- et al.
Effect of lingual nerve stimulation on hypoglossal motoneurons
Exp. Neurol.
(1968) - et al.
Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials of hypoglossal motoneurons of the cat
Exp. Neurol.
(1972) - et al.
Organization of spinal motoneuron dendrites in bundles
Exp. Neurol.
(1970) - et al.
The properties of lingually induced IPSPs in the masseteric motoneurons
Brain Res.
(1979) - et al.
Differential strength of action of glycine and GABA in hypoglossus nucleus
Pflügers Arch.
(1972) - et al.
Dendritic inhibition of spinal motoneurons
Cited by (29)
Neuronal chloride homeostasis and nerve injury
2020, Neuronal Chloride Transporters in Health and DiseaseDevelopment of synaptic transmission to respiratory motoneurons
2011, Respiratory Physiology and NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :There is evidence that in general respiratory motoneurons, whether brainstem or spinal cord, receive both glycinergic and GABAergic inhibition. In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that HMs receive both GABAergic and glycinergic synaptic inputs (Altmann et al., 1972; Donato and Nistri, 2000; O’Brien and Berger, 1999; Rekling et al., 2000; Takata and Ogata, 1980). Synaptic inhibition of HMs has been shown to occur concurrently with I-phase synaptic excitation, but in contrast to phrenic motoneurons where expiratory-phase synaptic inhibition also occurs, rhythmic expiratory-phase inhibition is not present in HMs (Peever et al., 2002; Saywell and Feldman, 2004; Withington-Wray et al., 1988; Woch and Kubin, 1995).
GABA<inf>B</inf> modulation of GABA<inf>A</inf> and glycine receptor-mediated synaptic currents in hypoglossal motoneurons
2004, Respiratory Physiology and NeurobiologyTwo types of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in the hypoglossal motoneurons
1993, Progress in Neurobiology
- 1
Dr. Ogata is at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Osaka University. The authors acknowledge Professor G. Somjen, Department of Physiology, Medical School, Duke University, for his helpful criticism in preparing the manuscript. This study was supported in part by a research grant (No. 457461) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.