Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 206, Issue 2, 16 February 1981, Pages 287-303
Brain Research

Regional distribution of functions in parietal association area 7 of the monkey

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(81)90533-3Get rights and content

Summary

The functions of cells in different parts of area 7 were studied in 5 hemispheres of three stumptail macaques (Macata speciosa). Activity of groups of cells was recorded in non-anesthetized animals using coarse microelectrodes. Functional maps covering the exposed part of area 7 showed that purely visual and oculomotor responses occurred in area 7a (PG) whereas the skin was dominantly represented in area 7b (PF). Vision was also represented in 7b but here together with somatic mechanisms. Oculomotor discharges were concentrated in the medial part of area 7a, whereas motor action of the arm and hand extended across the medial part of area 7. Motor actions of the mouth were represented most laterally. A statistically significant somatotopic arrangement of the body surface was also observed: the face was represented most laterally and the body and legs most medially with large overlapping regions. In the posterior part of 7a a kinesthetic region was found with representation of joints and muscles. The combination of visual and cutaneous activation was common more laterally than the combination of visual and somatomotor activation. Laterally the visual representation ended at the border between area 7 and area 2 of S I at a locus in front of which the S I receptive fields were located inside the mouth. These results indicate that different functions are represented in different degrees in different parts of area 7. Therefore, one important determinant of the results obtained by various research groups is the area of recording within area 7.

References (33)

  • BurtonH. et al.

    The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in New World and Old World monkeys

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1976)
  • DuffyF.H. et al.

    Somatosensory system: Organizational hierarchy from single units in monkey area 5

    Science

    (1971)
  • EvartsE.V.

    Methods for recording activity of individual neurons in moving animals

  • FlemingJ.F.R. et al.

    The parietal lobe as an additional motor area: The motor effects of electrical stimulation and ablation of cortical area 5 and 7 in monkeys

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1955)
  • FriendlichA.R.

    Primate head restrainer using a nonsurgical technique

    J. appl. Physiol.

    (1973)
  • Hyva¨rinenJ. et al.

    Comparison of effects of pentobarbital and alcohol on the cellular activity in the posterior parietal association cortex

    Acta physiol. scand.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (200)

    • Evolutionary perspective on peripersonal space and perception

      2023, Cognitive Archaeology, Body Cognition, and the Evolution of Visuospatial Perception
    • Investigating the neuroanatomy underlying proprioception using a stroke model

      2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, we evaluated the impact of lesions to specific cortical regions, and combinations of regions, (TP, S1 and Insula) on performance of the APM and KIN tasks, when other regions were spared. Given that studies show proprioceptive activity in TP regions irrespective of the integrity of S1 [15,16,19,34], and TP lesions have previously been linked with impaired proprioception without controlling for S1 damage [22–24], we also hypothesised that impairments would be observed when TP regions were damaged, even when S1 remained unaffected by the lesion. Further, we hypothesised that participants with lesions not involving the putative network would have no impairments on either task.

    • Organization of the macaque monkey inferior parietal lobule based on multimodal receptor architectonics

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The caudal cluster includes areas Opt, PG, and PGop, which occupy the same position as area 7a of Vogt and Vogt (1919). Activation of caudal IPL areas is associated with visual and oculomotor responses (Hyvarinen 1981; Leinonen et al. 1979; Leinonen and Nyman 1979; Andersen et al. 1990; Rozzi et al. 2008), combined with a poor representation of somatosensory responses (Rozzi et al. 2008). Furthermore, motor properties were widely though weakely represented in caudal IPL (Rozzi et al. 2008).

    • 4.22 - How the Senses Guide Goal-Directed and Defensive Actions: Common Principles of Organization

      2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
    • 4.18 - Dorsal and Ventral Streams in the Sense of Touch

      2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Preliminary results of this study were presented at the IIIrd European Neuroscience Meeting in Rome, September, 1979.

    View full text