Brain stem PGO-on cells projecting directly to the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

The role of dopamine (DA)-ergic neurons in ventral tegmental area (VTA) in schizophrenia, depression, hallucinations have been extensively studied. Rapid eye movement sleep (REMS), the closest objective correlate of dream and hallucination, is disrupted during these psychological dysfunctions; however, it was unknown if there is any common neuronal substrate for their regulation. Interactions among locus coeruleus (LC) REM-OFF and pedunculopontine tegmentum (PPT) REM-ON neurons have been reported to regulate REMS in health and diseases. Recently we have reported that PPT neurons modulate VTA and REMS. However, although VTA-DA neurons receive projections from LC and PPT, their role in REMS regulation was unclear. We proposed that the LC and PPT might intermittently modulate VTA-DA neurons and modulate REMS. Male Wistar rats were surgically prepared and electrophysiological wakefulness-sleep-REMS recorded in chronic freely moving condition. We employed RNAi induced downregulation of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) to evaluate the role of VTA-DA in regulating REMS. We observed that TH-knockdown in VTA decreased REMS in experimental rats, which returned to baseline upon PPT stimulation. Thus, VTA-DA neurons are activated by the REM-ON neurons to modulate REMS, the closest objectively recordable correlate of dreams. In these animals, LC stimulation altered Non-REMS and waking. Based on the findings we have discussed the role of VTA neurochemical circuitry in REMS regulation and their possible implications with REMS-associated dreaming and hallucination in health and diseases.

The advent of optogenetics has revolutionized the neuronal circuitry underlying sleep and wakefulness. Indeed, the circuit structure in the lateral hypothalamus has served as a “Rosetta stone” to decipher the language of vigilance states. For the first time, researchers have been able to control neural activity in vivo with both spatial and temporal precision, experimentally probing the brain regions and cell populations contributing to transient sleep/wake regulation. More recent advancements in opsin development and genetic targeting have allowed scientists to interrogate functional circuitry, distinguishing subpopulations of heterogenous brain structures and even the disparate projection targets of similar, adjacent cell types. Here we review the literature accumulated over the last decade, highlighting the main neuronal structures and cell-types contributing to vigilance state transitions. Our article concludes with forehanded discussion of the potential utility of optogenetics for elucidating the functionality of sleep, citing optogenetic studies manipulating sleep-related memory consolidation and cognitive performance as an exemplar approach.

A great pioneer in sleep research, Michel Jouvet applied rigorous scientific methods to the study of sleep-wake states and associated changes in consciousness which, with his vivid imagination and creative mind, he unveiled as the mysteries of sleep and waking such as to inspire a generation of researchers in the field. His initial discovery of a third state distinguished from waking (W) and slow wave sleep (SWS) by the paradoxical association of W-like cortical activity with sleep-like behavior and muscle atonia that he accordingly called “paradoxical sleep” (PS) began his investigation over some 50 years of the mechanisms of these three sleep-wake states. Using primarily lesion and pharmacological manipulations, he sought the systems which are necessary and sufficient, and he thereby provided an early blueprint of how the neuromodulatory systems could determine the sleep-wake states. With the application of increasingly more selective lesion and other advanced techniques including, notably, single unit recording combined with histochemical identification of recorded units, the monoamines and acetylcholine, together with peptidergic systems have been revealed to play modulatory, yet not essential, roles acting upon other intermingled glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons that are the effector neurons of the sleep-wake states and their cortical and behavioral correlates.

We have recorded, for the first time, in non-anesthetized, head-restrained mice, a total of 339 single units in and around the laterodorsal (LDT) and sublaterodorsal (SubLDT) tegmental nuclei, which are located, respectively, in, or beneath, the periaqueductal gray and contain cholinergic neurons. The recordings were made during the complete wake–sleep cycle including wakefulness (W), slow-wave sleep (SWS), and paradoxical (or rapid eye movement) sleep (PS). The tegmental neurons displayed either a biphasic narrow or triphasic broad action potential. Seventy-six LDT or SubLDT neurons characterized by their triphasic long-duration action potentials were judged to be cholinergic and this was verified in anesthetized mice using neurobiotin juxtacellular labeling combined with choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry of the recorded cell. The 76 presumed cholinergic neurons discharged tonically at the highest rate during W and PS (W/PS-active neurons) as either single isolated spikes or clusters of two to five spikes, and 26 of them discharged selectively during W and PS, these W/PS-selective neurons being found mainly in the SubLDT. The clustering discharge was particularly prominent during PS, when it was associated with an obvious phasic change in the cortical electroencephalogram (EEG), and during waking periods, when it was accompanied by abrupt body movements. During the transition from sleep to waking, the cholinergic W/PS-selective neurons and the LDT or SubLDT noncholinergic W-selective neurons showed firing before the onset of W, while, at the transition from waking to sleep, they ceased firing before sleep onset. At the transition from SWS to PS, all the cholinergic neurons exhibited a significant increase in discharge rate before the onset of PS. The present study in mice supports the view that cholinergic and noncholinergic LDT and SubLDT neurons play an important role in tonic and phasic processes of arousal and cortical EEG activation occurring during W or PS, as well as in the sleep/waking switch.

Forty-five years ago Shik and colleagues were the first to demonstrate that electrical stimulation of the dorsal pontine reticular formation induced fictive locomotion in decerebrate cats. This supraspinal motor site was subsequently termed the “mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR)”. Cholinergic neurons of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) have been suggested to form, or at least comprise in part, the neuroanatomical basis for the MLR, but direct evidence is lacking. In an effort to clarify the location and activity profiles of pontine reticulospinal neurons supporting locomotor behaviors, we employed in the present study a retrograde tracing method in combination with single-unit recordings and antidromic spinal cord stimulation as well as characterized the locomotor- and behavioral state-dependent activities of both reticulospinal and non-reticulospinal neurons. The retrograde labeling and antidromic stimulation responses suggested a candidate group of reticulospinal neurons that were non-cholinergic and located just medial to the PPT cholinergic neurons and ventral to the cuneiform nucleus (CnF). Unit recordings from these reticulospinal neurons in freely behaving animals revealed that the preponderance of neurons fired in relation to motor behaviors and that some of these neurons were also active during rapid eye movement sleep. By contrast, non-reticulospinal neurons, which likely included cholinergic neurons, did not exhibit firing activity in relation to motor behaviors. In summary, the present study provides neuroanatomical and electrophysiological evidence that non-cholinergic, pontine reticulospinal neurons may constitute the major component of the long-sought neuroanatomic MLR in mammals.

Interactions among REM-ON and REM-OFF neurons form the basic scaffold for rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) regulation; however, precise mechanism of their activation and cessation, respectively, was unclear. Locus coeruleus (LC) noradrenalin (NA)-ergic neurons are REM-OFF type and receive GABA-ergic inputs among others. GABA acts postsynaptically on the NA-ergic REM-OFF neurons in the LC and presynaptically on the latter's projection terminals and modulates NA-release on the REM-ON neurons. Normally during wakefulness and non-REMS continuous release of NA from the REM-OFF neurons, which however, is reduced during the latter phase, inhibits the REM-ON neurons and prevents REMS. At this stage GABA from substantia nigra pars reticulate acting presynaptically on NA-ergic terminals on REM-ON neurons withdraws NA-release causing the REM-ON neurons to escape inhibition and being active, may be even momentarily. A working-model showing neurochemical-map explaining activation of inactivation process, showing contribution of GABA-ergic presynaptic inhibition in withdrawing NA-release and dis-inhibition induced activation of REM-ON neurons, which in turn activates other GABA-ergic neurons and shutting-off REM-OFF neurons for the initiation of REMS-generation has been explained. Our model satisfactorily explains yet unexplained puzzles (i) why normally REMS does not appear during waking, rather, appears following non-REMS; (ii) why cessation of LC-NA-ergic-REM-OFF neurons is essential for REMS-generation; (iii) factor(s) which does not allow cessation of REM-OFF neurons causes REMS-loss; (iv) the association of changes in levels of GABA and NA in the brain during REMS and its deprivation and associated symptoms; v) why often dreams are associated with REMS.