Abstract
The acquisition of reading skill was studied in 503 Italian children in first to eighth grade using a task that required reading of lists of words and non-words. Analysis of the metric characteristics of the measures indicated that reading speed but not accuracy was normally distributed across all ages considered. The role of specific effects (length, word frequency, and lexicality) versus global factors in reading speed was examined using the Rate–Amount Model (RAM). A global processing factor accounted for a large portion of the variance. Specific influences of length, frequency, and lexicality were detected in different periods of development over and above the global processing factor. Length modulated performance at early stages of learning and progressively less later on; in the case of non-words, the effect of length was large but did not change as a function of grade. The lexicality effect, present at all ages for high frequency words and by third grade for low frequency words increased with reading practice indicating a progressive differentiation in the ability to read words and non-words. Finally, the effect of word frequency was highest in third grade and then decreased. These findings are discussed in terms of their relevance for reading acquisition in a language with transparent orthography and their implications for evaluating developmental reading deficits. Overall, it is proposed that RAM is a useful tool for disentangling the role of specific versus global factors in reading development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, P. T., & Dykman, R. A. (1993). Phonological processes, confrontation naming, and immediate memory in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 597–609.
Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with a shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 75–95.
Bamber, D. (1979). State trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 137–181.
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 424–434.
Bates, E., Burani, C., D’Amico, S., & Barca, L. (2001). Word reading and picture naming in Italian. Memory and Cognition, 29, 986–999.
Bonifacci, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2008). Speed of processing and reading disability: A cross-linguistic investigation of dyslexia and borderline intellectual functioning. Cognition, 107, 999–1017.
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586.
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., & Cossa, F. M. (1999). How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 216–228.
Coltheart, M., & Leahy, J. (1996). Assessment of lexical and nonlexical reading abilities in children: Some normative data. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 136–140.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Cossu, G. (1999). The acquisition of Italian orthography. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write. A cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes?. Reading and Writing, 7, 9–22.
De Brauwer, J. D., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). The representation of multiplication facts: Developmental changes in the problem size, five and tie effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 43–56.
De Luca, M., Borrelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudo-words: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 80, 617–626.
De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (1999). Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1407–1420.
Di Filippo, G., De Luca, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Lexicality and stimulus length effects in Italian dyslexics: Role of overadditivity effect. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 141–149.
Ellis, A. W. (1985). The production of spoken words: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 185–207.
IBM Italia. (1989). VELI, Vocabolario Elettronico della Lingua Italiana. Milan: IBM.
Job, R., Peressotti, F., & Cusinato, A. (1998). Lexical effects in naming pseudowords in shallow orthographies: Further empirical data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 622–630.
Judica, A., De Luca, M., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Training of developmental surface dyslexia improves reading performance and shortens eye fixation duration in reading. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 177–197.
Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.
Kail, R., & Hall, L. K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949–954.
Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225.
Landerl, K. (2001). Word recognition deficits in German: More evidence from a representative sample. Dyslexia, 7, 183–196.
Logan, G. D. (1992). Shapes of reaction times distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 883–914.
Nazir, T. A., Ben-Boutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2004). Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words. Brain and Language, 88, 294–311.
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Tosi, V., De Nigris, B., & Carrieri, R. (2006). From phonological recoding to lexical reading: A longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 576–607.
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–52.
Salthouse, T. A., & Hedden, T. (2002). Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 858–872.
Sartori, G., Job, R., & Tressoldi, P. (1995). Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e della disortografia evolutiva. Florence: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming latencies: Role of reading experience and reading deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217–235.
Spring, C., & Davis, J. M. (1988). Relations of digit naming speed with free components of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 315–334.
Tressoldi, P. E. (1996). L’evoluzione della lettura e della scrittura dalla 2a elementare alla 3a media. Dati per un modello di sviluppo e per la diagnosi dei disturbi specifici. Età evolutiva, 56, 43–55.
Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bus, A. G. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 266–275.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.
Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubt on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272–277.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321–340.
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373.
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216.
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2008). Isolating global and specific factors in developmental dyslexia: A study based on the rate and amount model (RAM). Experimental Brain Research, 186, 551–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Experimental reading task items
Practice trial for non-words. reme, soate, cata, borla, same, custa, rilo, fuodi, valo, reito, focca, cino, sagno, nore, vadre, pada, sevio, irna, lasta, dibo.
Short non-words. dete, borma, voro, bitto, lasa, sargo, dase, panto, gese, binca, anci, vunto, bine, nutto, goce, tucca, arlo, borte, mata, donso, luso, molpa, zato, vondo, moso, vasso, lona, parne, ceva, mosmo.
Long non-words. primosta, fanziane, mirigante, sonviglio, podiglia, bileggio, tegresto, strebafe, grocelso, stilappo, panchefa, bismacca, risumapa, oblimione, soribanto, gracetto, pralotto, montrillo, canfrosto, prigiosa, flenesta, lonaggio, tresilio, presemma, raspelto, varniale, nisciope, banzione, trelidente, alcelisto.
Practice trial for words. rete, soave, data, borsa, fame, costa, riso, fuori, vago, reato, bocca, cono, sogno, noce, madre, paga, serio, urna, pasta, divo.
High frequency short words. lira, mondo, modo, forma, zero, luogo, voce, conto, uomo, volta, casa, spesa, tipo, linea, piano, donna, fase, acqua, mano, posto, vita, grado, sede, mezzo, capo, ruolo, caso, fondo, crisi, campo.
High frequency long words. capacità, politica, sindacato, operazione, rapporto, famiglia, occasione, movimento, articolo, istituto, settimana, università, ministro, industria, obiettivo, bilancio, elezione, compagnia, intervento, processo, rispetto, decisione, situazione, campagna, successo, posizione, lavoratore, immagine, confronto, controllo.
Low frequency short words. olmo, botto, lena, cargo, sito, dosso, cava, balia, anca, dorso, tana, baule, lima, abate, nova, oncia, saga, bivio, fuso, suola, noce, sodio, agro, fermo, covo, zinco, duna, turca, duce, sonda.
Low frequency long words. frenesia, bimestre, antipatia, cervellone, addebito, prodigio, riassunto, telescopio, tonalità, barricata, alcolismo, rendiconto, aliscafo, retaggio, femminismo, noleggio, regresso, attivista, oreficeria, rodaggio, annuario, eversione, fotogramma, accumulo, umorista, stupidità, trampolino, asparago, panchina, marmellata.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G. et al. Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Read Writ 22, 1053–1079 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8