Abstract
In the last decade, the use of high-density electrode arrays for EEG recordings combined with the improvements of source reconstruction algorithms has allowed the investigation of brain networks dynamics at a sub-second scale. One powerful tool for investigating large-scale functional brain networks with EEG is time-varying effective connectivity applied to source signals obtained from electric source imaging. Due to computational and interpretation limitations, the brain is usually parcelled into a limited number of regions of interests (ROIs) before computing EEG connectivity. One specific need and still open problem is how to represent the time- and frequency-content carried by hundreds of dipoles with diverging orientation in each ROI with one unique representative time-series. The main aim of this paper is to provide a method to compute a signal that explains most of the variability of the data contained in each ROI before computing, for instance, time-varying connectivity. As the representative time-series for a ROI, we propose to use the first singular vector computed by a singular-value decomposition of all dipoles belonging to the same ROI. We applied this method to two real datasets (visual evoked potentials and epileptic spikes) and evaluated the time-course and the frequency content of the obtained signals. For each ROI, both the time-course and the frequency content of the proposed method reflected the expected time-course and the scalp-EEG frequency content, representing most of the variability of the sources (~ 80%) and improving connectivity results in comparison to other procedures used so far. We also confirm these results in a simulated dataset with a known ground truth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adebimpe A, Aarabi A, Bourel-Ponchel E, Mahmoudzadeh M, Wallois F (2016) EEG resting state functional connectivity analysis in children with Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. Front Neurosci 10:143
Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximal likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G (eds) Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York, pp 199–213
Ales JM, Farzin F, Rossion B, Norcia AM, (2012) An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. J Vis 12(10):18–18, 2012
Alonso Prieto E, Caharel S, Henson RN, Rossion B (2011) Early (N170/M170) face-sensitivity despite right lateral occipital brain damage in acquired prosopagnosia. Front Hum Neurosci 5(138):1–23, 2011
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Marciani MG, Baccala LA, de Vico Fallani F, Salinari S, Ursino M, Zagaglia M, Ding L, Edgar JC (2007) Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings. Hum Brain Mapp 28(2):143–157
Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Carducci C, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Mattia D, Astolfi L, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Ding L, Ni Y, Cheng J, Christine K, Sweeney J, He B (2005) Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function. NeuroImage 24(1):118–131
Baccalà LA, Koichi S (2014) Partial directed coherence. In: Baccalà LA, Koichi S (eds) Methods in brain connectivity inference through multivariate time series analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 57–73
Baker AP, Brookes MJ, Rezek IA, Smith SM, Behrens T, Probert Smith PJ, Woolrich M (2014) Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity. Elife 3:1–18
Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, Fawcett IP, Singh KD (2004) Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images. Hum Brain Mapp 23:120–127
Baroni F, van Kempen J, Kawasaki H, Kovach CK, Oya H, Howard MA, Adolphs R, Tsuchiya N (2017) Intracranial markers of conscious face perception in humans. NeuroImage 162:322–343
Barzegaran E, Knyazeva MG (2017) Functional connectivity analysis in EEG source space: the choice of method. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0181105
Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cognit Neurosci 8(6):551–565
Bigdely-Shamlo N, Mullen T, Kothe C, Su KM, Robbins KA (2015) The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front Neuroinform 9:16
Botzel K, Schulze S, Stodieck S (1995) Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res 104(1):135–143
Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Wissmeier M, Vargas MI, Vulliemoz S, Pollo C, Schaller K, Michel CM, Seeck M (2011) Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain 134(10):2887–2897
Brodie MJ, Zuberi SM, Scheffer IE, Fisher RS (2018) The 2017 ILAE classification of seizure types and the epilepsies: what do people with epilepsy and their caregivers need to know? Epileptic Disord 20(2):77–87
Brookes MJ, Woolrich M, Luckhoo H, Price D, Hale JR, Stephenson MC, Barnes GR, Smith SM, Morris PG (2011) Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16783–16788
Brunet D, Murray MM, Michel CM (2011) Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannels EEG: CARTOOL. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:2–15
Brunner C, Billinger M, Seeber M, Mullen TR, Makeig S (2016) Volume conduction influences scalp-based connectivity estimates. Front Comput Neurosci 10:121
Canuet L, Ishii R, Pascual-Marqui RD, Iwase M, Kurimoto R, Aoki Y, Ikeda S, Takahashi H, Nakahachi T, Takeda M (2011) Resting-state EEG source localization and functional connectivity in Schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27863
Cichocki A, Mandic D, De Lathauwer L, Zhou G, Zhao Q, Caiafa C, Phan HA (2015) Tensor decomposition for signal processing applications: from two-way to multiway component analysis. IEEE Signal Process Mag 32(2):145–163
Cline AK, Moler CB, Stewart GW, Wilkinson JH (1979) An estimate of the condition number of a matrix. SIAM J Numer Anal 16(2):368–375
Coito A, Plomp G, Genetti M, Abela E, Wiest R, Seek M, Michel CM, Vulliemoz S (2015) Dynamic directed interictal connectivity in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 56(2):207–217
Coito A, Michel CM, van Mierlo P, Vulliemoz S, Plomp G (2016) Directed functional brain connectivity based on EEG source imaging: methodology and application to temporal lobe epilepsy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(12):2619–2628
Cong F, Lin QH, Kuang LD, Gong XF, Astinkainen P, Ristaniemi T (2015) Tensor decomposition of EEG signals: a brief review. J Neurosci Methods 248:59–69
Constable RT, Scheinost D, Finn ES, Shen X, Hampson M, Winstanley FS, Spencer DD, Papademetris X (2013) Potential use challenges of functional connectivity mapping in intractable epilepsy. Front Neurol 4:39
Daducci A, Gerhard S, Griffa A, Lemkaddem A, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Hagmann P, Thiran J-P (2012) The connectome mapper: an open-source processing pipeline to map connectomes with MRI. PLoS ONE 7(12):e48121
Dalrymple KA, Oruc I, Duchaine B, Pancaroglu R, Fox CJ, Iaria G, Handy TC, Barton JJ (2011) The anatomic basis of the right face-selective N170 IN acquired prosopagnosia: a combined ERP/fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 49(9):2553–2563
Daunizeau J, Friston KJ (2007) A mesostate-space model for EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 38:67–81
de Reus MA, Van den Heuvel MP (2013) The parcellation-based connectome: limitations and extensions. Neuroimage 80:397–404
De Munck JC, Van Dijk BW, Spekreijse HENK (1988) Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(11):960–966
De Peralta Menendez RG, Murray MM, Michel CM, Martuzzi R, Gonzalez-Andino SL (2004) Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage 21(2):527–539
Desikan R, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn B, Dickerson B, Blacker D, Buckner R, Dale A, Maguire R-P, Hyman B, Albert M, Killiany R (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31(3):968–980
Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E (2010) Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 53(1):1–15
Engel J, Thompson PM, Stern JM, Staba RJ, Bragin A, Mody I (2013) Connectomics and epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol 26(2):186–194
Evans AC, Janke AL, Collins DL, Baillet S (2012) Brain templates and atlases. NeuroImage 62(2):911–922
Fischl B, Van Der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Ségonne F, Salat DH, Busa E, Seidman LJ, Goldstein J, Caviness DV, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14(1):11–22
FreeSurfer Software Suite, [Online]. http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/
Ghuman AS, Brunet NM, Li Y, Konecky RO, Pyles JA, Walls SA, Destefino V, Wang W, Richardson M (2014) Dynamic encoding of face information in the human fusiform gyrus. Nat Commun 5:5672
Grech R, Cassar T, Muscat J, Camilleri KP, Fabri SG, Zervakis M, Xanthopoulos P, Sakkalis V, Vanrumste B (2008) Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabilit 7(1):25 5
Grill-Spector K, Knouf N, Kanwisher N (2004) The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat Neurosci 7:555–562
Gruber T, Maess B, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Müller MM (2008) Sources of synchronized induced Gamma-Band responses during a simple object recognition task: a replication study in human MEG. Brain Res 1196:74–84
Hamamé CM, Vidal JR, Perrone-Bertolotti M, Ossandon T, Jerbi K, Kahane P, Bertrand O, Lachaux JP (2014) Functional selectivity in the human occipitotemporal cortex during natural vision: evidence from combined intracranial EEG and eye-tracking. Neuroimage 95:276–286
Hansen PC (1992) Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev 34:561–580
Hassan M, Merlet I, Mheich A, Kabbara A, Biraben A, Nica A, Wendling F (2017) Identification of interactical epileptic networks from dense-EEG. Brain Topogr 30(1):60–76
Haufe S, Nikulin VV, Muller KR, Nolte G (2013) A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study. NeuroImage 64:120–133
Haxby JV, Ungerleider LG, Clark VP, Schouten JL, Hoffman EA, Martin A (1999) The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron 22(1):189–199
Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI (2000) The distributed human system for face perception. Trends Cognit Sci 4(6):223–233
Hoffman E, Haxby J (2000) Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nat Neurosci 10(3):80–84
Ioannides AA, Liu LC, Kwapien J, Drozdz S, Streit M (2000) Coupling of regional activations in a human brain during an object and face affect recognition task. Hum Brain Mapp 11:77–92
Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2004) N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb Cortex 14(2):132–142
Kiebel SJ, David O, Friston KJ (2006) Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization. NeuroImage 30(4):1273–1284
Kropotov JD (2016) Sensory systems and attention modulation. In: Kropotov JD (ed) Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry: applications for diagnosis and treatment. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 137–169
McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record, 673. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1978/673/673-012.pdf
Megevand P, Spinelli L, Genetti M, Brodbeck V, Momjian S, Schaller K, Michel CM, Vulliemoz S, Seeck M (2014) Electric source imaging of interictal activity accurately localises the seizure onset zone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(1):38–43
Michel CM, He B (2012) EEG mapping and source imaging. In: Schomer DL, da Silva FHL (eds) Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields, 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP), London, pp 1179–1202
Michel CM, He B (2018) EEG mapping and source imaging. In: Schomer DL, da Silva FHL (eds) Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1135–1156
Michel CM, Murray MM (2012) Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool. Neuroimage 61(2):371–385
Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzales S, Spinelli L, De Peralta RG (2004) EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 115(10):2195–2222
Milde T, Leistritz L, Astolfi L, Miltner HR, Weiss T, Babiloni F, Witte H (2010) A new Kalman filter approach for the estimation og high-dimensional time-variant multivariate AR models and its application in analysis of laser-evoked brain potentials. NeuroImage 50:960–969
Miller KJ, Hermes D, Pestilli F, Wig GS, Ojemann JG (2017) Face percept formation in human ventral temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 118(5):2614–2627
Moraca N (2008) Bounds for norms of the matrix inverse and the smallest singular value. Linear Algebra Appl 429(10):2589–2601
Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallet M (2004) Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 115(10):2292–2307
Olier I, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, El-Deredy W (2013) A switching multi-scale dynamical network model of EEG/MEG. NeuroImage 83:262–287
Phillips C, Rugg MD, Friston KJ (2002) Anatomically informed basis functions for EEG source localization: combining functional and anatomical costraints. NeuroImage 16(3):678–695
Richardson MP (2012) Large brain models of epilepsy: dynamics meets connectomics. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83(12):1238–1248
Rossion B, Caharel S (2011) ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception. Vis Res 51:1297–1311
Rossion B, Jacques C (2008) Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage 39(4):1959–1979
Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 52(3):1059–1069
Sameshima K, Baccala LA (2014) Methods in brain connectivity inference through multivariate time series analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Jentzsch I, Burton A, Kaufmann JM (2002) Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cogn Brain Res 14(3):398–409
Sheybani L, Birot G, Contestabile A, Seek M, Kiss J, Schaller K, Michel CM, Quairiaux C (2018) Electrophysiological evidence for the development of a self-sustained large-scale epileptic network in the kainate mouse-model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci 38(15):3776–3791
Sperdin HF, Coito A, Kojovic N, Rihs TA, Jan RK, Franchini M, Plomp G, Vulliemoz S, Eliez S, Michel CM, Schaer M (2018) Early alterations of social brain networks in young children with autism. eLife 7:e31670
Spinelli L, Andino SG, Lantz G, Seek M, Michel CM (2000) Electromagnetic inverse solution in anatomically constrained spherical head models. Brain Topogr 13(2):115–125
Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A (2007) Phase lagg index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp 28(11):1178–1193
Supp GG, Schlögl A, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Müller MM, Gruber T (2007) Directed cortical information flow during human object recognition: analyzing induced EEG gamma-band responses in brain’s source space. PLoS ONE 2:e684
Takahashi DY, Baccala LA, Sameshima K (2010) Information partial directed coherence. Biol Cybern 103:463–469
The Cartool Community group, [Online]. https://cartoolcommunity.unige.ch
Tzourio-Mazoyer N (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI mRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15:273–289
Uehara T, Yamasaki T, Okamoto T, Koike T, Kan S, Miyauchi S, Kira J, Tobimatsu S (2013) Efficiency of a “small-world” brain network depends on consciousness level: a resting-state fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 24(6):1529–1539
Van Diessen E, Zweiphenning WJEM, Jansen FE, Stam CJ, Braun KPJ, Otte WM (2014) Brain network organization in focal epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114606
van Mierlo P, Lie O, Staljanssens W, Coito A, Vulliémoz S (2018) Influence of time-series normalization, number of nodes, connectivity and graph measure selection on seizure-onset zone localization from intracranial EEG. Brain Topogr 31:753–766
Van de Steen F, Faes L, Karahan E, Songriri J, Valdes-Sosa PA, Marinazzo D (2016) Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical connectivity analysis. Brain Topogr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0538-7
Vidaurre D, Quinn AJ, Baker AP, Dupret D, Tejero-Cantero A, Woolrich MW (2016) Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data. NeuroImage 126:81–95
Wibral M, Vicente R, Lindner M (2014) Transfer entropy in neuroscience. In: Wibral M, Vicente R, Lizier J (eds) Directed information measures in neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–36
Zhou Z, Ding M, Chen Y, Wright P, Lu Z, Liu Y (2009) Detecting directional influence in fMRI connectivity analysis using PCA based Granger causality. Brain Res 1289:22–29
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
Funding
This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. CRSII5-170873 to PH, PvM, GP, SV and CMM; Grant No. 320030_159705 to CMM; Grant No. PP00P1_157420 to GP; No. 320030-169198 to SV), by the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) “SYNAPSY—The Synaptic Basis of Mental Diseases” (NCCR Synapsy Grant No. 51NF40-158776 to PH and CMM), by the Foundation Gertrude Von Meissner (to SV), and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement (Grant No. 660230 to PvM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Jorge Javier Riera.
This is one of several papers published together in Brain Topography on the “Special Issue: Controversies in EEG Source Analysis”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubega, M., Carboni, M., Seeber, M. et al. Estimating EEG Source Dipole Orientation Based on Singular-value Decomposition for Connectivity Analysis. Brain Topogr 32, 704–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0691-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0691-2