Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuromodelling based on evolutionary robotics: on the importance of motor control for spatial attention

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mainstream approaches to modelling cognitive processes have typically focused on (1) reproducing their neural underpinning, without regard to sensory-motor systems and (2) producing a single, ideal computational model. Evolutionary robotics is an alternative possibility to bridge the gap between neural substrate and behavior by means of a sensory-motor apparatus, and a powerful tool to build a population of individuals rather than a single model. We trained 4 populations of neurorobots, equipped with a pan/tilt/zoom camera, and provided with different types of motor control in order to perform a cancellation task, often used to tap spatial cognition. Neurorobots’ eye movements were controlled by (a) position, (b) velocity, (c) simulated muscles and (d) simulated muscles with fixed level of zoom. Neurorobots provided with muscle and velocity control showed better performances than those controlled in position. This is an interesting result since muscle control can be considered a particular type of position control. Finally, neurorobots provided with muscle control and zoom outperformed those without zooming ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bartolomeo P (2014) Attention disorders after right brain damage. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Marshall JC, Weidner R, Fink GR (2009) Zooming in and zooming out of the attentional focus: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 19:805–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deco G, Zihl J (2004) A biased competition based neurodynamical model of visual neglect. Med Eng Phys 26(9):733–743. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Ferdinando A, Parisi D, Bartolomeo P (2007) Modeling orienting behavior and its disorders with “ecological” neural networks. J Cogn Neurosci 19(6):1033–1049

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotta O, Bartolomeo P, Miglino O (2013) Introducing sensory-motor apparatus in neuropsychological modelization. In CEUR workshop proceedings, vol 1100, pp 80–87

  • Gigliotta O, Mirolli M, Nolfi S (2014) Communication based dynamic role allocation in a group of homogeneous robots. Nat Comput 13(3):391–402. doi:10.1007/s11047-014-9443-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotta O, Bartolomeo P, Miglino O (2015) Approaching neuropsychological tasks through adaptive neurorobots. Connect Sci 27(2):153–163. doi:10.1080/09540091.2014.968094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM (2003) Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. TRENDS in Cogn Sci 7(11):498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgetag CC (2000) Spatial neglect and paradoxical lesion effects in the cat—a model based on midbrain connectivity. Neurocomputing 32–33:793–799. doi:10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00246-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennie P (2003) The cost of cortical computation. Curr Biol 13(6):493–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massera G (2010) Evolution of grasping behaviour in anthropomorphic robotic arms with embodied neural controllers. University of Plymouth

  • Massera G, Cangelosi A, Nolfi S (2007) Evolution of prehension ability in an anthropomorphic neurorobotic arm. Front Neurorobotics 1:4. doi:10.3389/neuro.12.004.2007

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Massera G, Ferrauto T, Gigliotta O, Nolfi S (2014) Designing adaptive humanoid robots through the FARSA open-source framework. Adapt Behav 22(4):255–265. doi:10.1177/1059712314536909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolfi S, Floreano D (2000) Evolutionary robotics: the biology, intelligence, and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolfi S, Gigliotta O (2010) Evorobot*. In: Nolfi S, Mirolli M (eds) Evolution of communication and language in embodied agents. Springer, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ownby RL, Harwood DG (1998) Neuropsychological assessment of attention and its disorders: computational models for neglect, extinction, and sustained attention. In: Parks R, Levine DS, Long DL (eds) Fundamentals of neural network modeling. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponticorvo M, Walker R, Miglino O (2007) Evolutionary robotics as a tool to investigate spatial cognition in artificial and natural systems. In: Loula AC, Gudwin R, Queirz J (eds) Artificial cognition systems. Idea Group, Hershley, pp 210–237. ISBN:1-59904-111-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (2014) Guides to the study of attention. In: Kastner S, Nobre AC (eds) The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ (2001) Simulating a lesion in a basis function model of spatial representations: comparison with hemineglect. Psychol Rev 108(3):653–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onofrio Gigliotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gigliotta, O., Bartolomeo, P. & Miglino, O. Neuromodelling based on evolutionary robotics: on the importance of motor control for spatial attention. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 237–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0714-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0714-9

Keywords

Navigation