Abstract
The frequency extent over which fine structure is coded in the auditory nerve has been physiologically characterized in laboratory animals but is unknown in humans. Knowledge of the upper frequency limit in humans would inform the debate regarding the role of fine structure in human hearing. Of the presently available techniques, only the recording of mass neural potentials offers the promise to provide a physiological estimate of neural phase locking in humans. A challenge is to disambiguate neural phase locking from the receptor potentials. We studied mass potentials recorded on the cochlea and auditory nerve of cat and used several experimental manipulations to isolate the neural contribution to these potentials. We find a surprisingly large neural contribution in the signal recorded on the cochlear round window, and this contribution is in many aspects similar to the potential measured on the auditory nerve. The results suggest that recording of mass potentials through the middle ear is a promising approach to examine neural phase locking in humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antoli-Candela EJ, Kiang NYS (1978) Unit activity underlying the N1 potential. In: Naunton R, Fernandez C (eds) Evoked electrical activity in the auditory nervous system. Academic, New York, pp 165–189
Blackburn CC, Sachs MB (1989) Classification of unit types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis. J Neurophysiol 62:1303–1329
Bourk TR (1976) In: Electrical responses of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. Ph.D. thesis, MIT
Chimento TC, Schreiner CE (1990) Time course of adaptation and recovery from adaptation in the cat auditory-nerve neurophonic. J Acoust Soc Am 88:857–864
Dallos P (1973) The auditory periphery. Academic, New York
Dolan DF, Xi L, Nuttall AL (1989) Characterization of an EPSP-like potential recorded remotely from the round window. J Acoust Soc Am 86:2167–2171
Eatock RA (2000) Adaptation in hair cells. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:285–314
Eggermont JJ (1976) Electrophysiological study of the normal and pathological human cochlea. II. Neural responses. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord 97(Suppl):497–506
Forgues M, Koehn HA, Dunnon AK, Pulver SH, Buchman CA, Adunka OF, Fitzpatrick DC (2013) Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window. J Neurophysiol
Galambos R, Davis H (1943) The response of single auditory nerve fibers to acoustic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 6:39–58
Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 22:613–636
Goldstein MH, Kiang NYS (1958) Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 30:107–114
Harris DM, Dallos P (1979) Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J Neurophysiol 42:1083–1107
He W, Porsov E, Kemp D, Nuttall AL, Ren T (2012) The group delay and suppression pattern of the cochlear microphonic potential recorded at the round window. PLoS ONE 7:e34356
Henry KR (1995) Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil. Hear Res 90:176–184
Johnson DH (1980) The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am 68:1115–1122
Joris PX, Carney LH, Smith PH, Yin TC (1994) Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. J Neurophysiol 71:1022–1036
Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF (1965) Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve, 35th edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Research Monograph No 35
Kiang NYS, Moxon EC, Kahn AR (1976) The relationship of gross potentials recorded from the cochlea to single unit activity in the auditory nerve. In: Ruben RJ, Elberling C, Salomon G (eds) Electrocochleography. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 95–115
Kidd RC, Weiss TF (1990) Mechanisms that degrade timing information in the cochlea. Hear Res 49:181–208
Lichtenhan JT, Cooper NP, Guinan JJ Jr (2013) A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept. Ear Hear 34:42–51
Moller AR, Jho HD (1989) Response from the exposed intracranial human auditory nerve to low-frequency tones: basic characteristics. Hear Res 38:163–175
Moore BC (2008) The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9:399–406
Palmer AR, Russell IJ (1986) Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair cells. Hear Res 24:1–15
Prijs VF (1986) Single-unit response at the round window of the guinea pig. Hear Res 21:127–133
Rhode WS, Smith PH (1985) Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers. Hear Res 18:159–168
Rose JE, Brugge JF, Anderson DJ, Hind JE (1967) Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 30:769–793
Snyder RL, Schreiner CE (1984a) The auditory neurophonic: basic properties. Hear Res 15:261–280
Snyder RL, Schreiner CE (1984b) The auditory neurophonic: basic properties. Hear Res 15:261–280
Snyder RL, Schreiner CE (1985) Forward masking of the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) and the frequency following response (FFR). Hear Res 20:45–62
Tasaki I (1954) Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J Neurophysiol 17:97–122
Verschooten E, Robles L, Kovacic D, Joris PX (2012) Auditory nerve frequency tuning measured with forward-masked compound action potentials. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol JARO 13:799–817
Weinberger MM, Kitzes LM, Goodman DA (1970) Some characteristics of the auditory neurophonic. Experientia Basle 26:46–48
Weiss TF, Rose C (1988a) A comparison of synchronization filters in different auditory receptor organs. Hear Res 33:175–180
Weiss TF, Rose C (1988b) Stages of degradation of timing information in the cochlea: a comparison of hair-cell and nerve-fiber responses in the alligator lizard. Hear Res 33:167–174
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by BOF (OT/09/50) (Flanders, Belgium).
Conflict of Interest
All (co-)authors have seen and agreed with the contents of the manuscript, and there is no financial interest to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verschooten, E., Joris, P.X. Estimation of Neural Phase Locking from Stimulus-Evoked Potentials. JARO 15, 767–787 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0465-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0465-9