Abstract
For animals to carry out a wide range of detection, recognition and navigation tasks, visual motion signals are crucial. The encoding of motion information has therefore, attracted much attention in the experimental and computational study of brain function. Two main alternative mechanisms have been proposed on the basis of behavioural and physiological experiments. On one hand, correlation-type and motion energy detectors are simple and efficient in the design of their basic mechanism but are tuned to temporal frequency rather than to speed. On other hand, gradient-type motion detectors directly represent an estimate of speed, but may require more demanding processing mechanisms. We demonstrate here how the temporal frequency dependence observed for sine-wave gratings can disappear for less constrained stimuli, to be replaced by responses reflecting speed for stimuli like square waves when a phase-sensitive detection mechanism is employed. We conclude from these observations that temporal frequency tuning is not necessarily a limitation for motion vision based on correlation detectors, and more generally demonstrate in view of the typical Fourier composition of natural scenes, that correlation detectors operating in such environments can encode image speed. In the context of our results, we discuss the implications of the loss of phase sensitivity inherent in using a linear system approach to describe neural processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1986) The extraction of spatiotemporal energy in Human and Machine Vision. Computer: pp 151–155
Borst A (2007) Correlation versus gradient type motion detectors: the pros and the cons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 362: 369–374
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci 12: 297–306
Bracewell RN (1986) The fourier transform and its applications. McGraw Hill, Singapore
Dror RO, O’Carroll D, Laughlin SB (2001) Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators. J Opt Soc Am A A18: 241–252
Fennema CL, Thompson WB (1979) Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Comput Graph Image Proc 9: 301–315
Götz KG (1964) Optomotorische untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik 2: 77–92
Götz KG (1975) The optomotor equilibrium of the Drosophila navigation system. J Comp Physiol 99: 187–210
Grzywacz NM, Koch C (1987) Functional properties of models for direction selectivity in the retina. Syn 1: 417–434
Grzywacz NM, Yuille AL (1990) A model for the estimate of local image velocity by cells in the visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 239: 129–161
Heeger DJ (1987) Model for the extraction of image flow. J Opt Soc Am A A4: 1455–1471
Johnston A, McOwan PW, Buxton H (1992) A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proc R Soc Lond B 250: 297–306
Limb JO, Murphy JA (1975) Estimating the velocity of moving images in television signals. Comput Graph Image Proc 4: 311–327
Perrone JA, Thiele A (2001) Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons. Nat Neurosci 4(5): 526–532
Poggio T, Reichardt W (1973) Considerations on models of movement detection. Kybernetik 13: 223–227
Priebe NJ, Cassanello CR, Lisberger SG (2003) The neural representation of speed in macaque area MT/V5. J Neurosci 23(13): 5650–5661
Priebe NJ, Lisberger SG, Movshon JA (2006) Tuning for spatiotemporal frequency and speed in directionally selective neurons of macaque striate cortex. J Neurosci 26(11): 2941–2950
Reichardt W (1987) Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. J Comp Physiol A 161: 533–547
Reichardt W, Poggio T (1976) Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly I. A quantitative analysis. Q Rev Biophys 9: 311–375
Reichardt W, Varjú D (1959) Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen. Z Naturforsch 14b: 674–689
Ruderman DL (1997) Origins of scaling in natural images. Vision Res 37: 3385–3398
Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Kirchner WH, Zhang SW (1991) Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees. Vis Neurosci 6: 519–535
Stone LS, Thompson P (1992) Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision Res 32: 1535–1549
Straw DA, Rainsford T, O’Carroll DC (2008) Contrast sensitivity of insect motion detectors to natural images. J Vis 8(3)(32):1–9
Van Santen JPH, Sperling G (1985) Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am A A2: 300–321
Varjú D (1959) Optomotorische Reaktionen auf die Bewegung periodischer Helligkeitsmuster (Anwendung der Systemtheorie auf Experimente am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z Naturforsch 14b: 724–735
Varjú D, Reichardt W (1967) Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen II. Z Naturforsch 22b: 1343–1351
Watson AB, Ahumada AJ (1985) Model of human visual-motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A A2: 322–342
Zanker JM (1994) Modeling human motion perception. I.Classical stimuli. Naturwiss 81: 156–163
Zanker JM (1996) On the elementary mechanism underlying secondary motion processing. Proc R Soc Lond B 351: 1725–1736
Zanker JM, Braddick OJ (1999) How does noise influence the estimation of speed. Vision Res 39: 2411–2420
Zanker JM, Srinivasan MV, Egelhaaf M (1999) Speed tuning in elementary motion detectors of the correlation type. Biol Cybern 80: 109–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meso, A.I., Zanker, J.M. Speed encoding in correlation motion detectors as a consequence of spatial structure. Biol Cybern 100, 361–370 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0307-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0307-8