Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of temporal resolution of object identification in human vision

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate the temporal processing capacity of human object identification under different stimulus conditions. Objects, either facial images or characters, were shown in a rapid sequence on a computer display using a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) method. One of the images was a target and the other images were distracters. The task of the observer was to identify the target. A staircase algorithm was used to determine the threshold frequency of image presentation in the RSVP sequence. The threshold frequency was determined as a function of image contrast, size, and mean luminance. The results showed that the threshold frequency, around 10 Hz for faces (100 ms per face) and about 25 Hz for characters (40 ms per character), was independent of contrast and size at medium and high contrast values, medium and large sizes, and high luminances, but decreased at very low contrasts or small sizes and medium or low levels of luminance. Computer simulations with a model, in which temporal integration limited perceptual speed, suggest that the experimentally found difference in processing time for faces and characters is not due to the physical differences of these stimulus types, but it seems that face-specific sites in the brain process facial information slower than object-specific areas process character information. Contrast, size, and luminance affect the signal-to-noise ratio and the temporal characteristics of low-level neural signal representation. Thus, the results suggest that at low contrasts, low luminances and small sizes, the processing speed of object identification is limited by low-level factors, while at high contrasts and luminances, and at large sizes, processing speed is limited by high-order processing stages. Processing speed seems to depend on stimulus type so that for faces processing is slower than for characters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Euclidean distance between the ith target g i (x,y) and the temporally filtered RSVP sequence s(x,y,t) at moment t is given by \( E_{i} {\text{ = }}\Sigma \Sigma [g_{i} (x,y) - s(x,y,t)]^{2} \).

References

  • Allison T, Puce A, Spencer DD, McCarthy G (1999) Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb Cortex 9:415–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avidan G, Harel M, Hendler T, Ben-Bashat D, Zohary E, Malach R (2002) Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. J Neurophysiol 87:3102–3116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon-Macé N, Macé MJ-M, Fabre-Thorpe M, Thorpe SJ (2005) The time-course of visual processing: backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Res 45:1459–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB (1957) Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. J Physiol 136:469–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donner K, Fagerholm P (2003) Visual reaction time: neural conditions for the equivalence of stimulus area and contrast. Vision Res 43:2937–2940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donner K, Koskelainen A, Djupsund K, Hemilä S (1995) Changes in retinal time scale under background light: observations on rods and ganglion cells in the frog retina. Vision Res 35:2255–2266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Malach R (2000) The dynamics of object selective activation correlates with recognition performance in humans. Nat Neurosci 3:837–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht S, Shlaer S, Pirenne MH (1942) Energy, quanta, and vision. J Gen Physiol 25:819–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JS, Olshausen BA (2003) Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. J Vision 3:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DH (1961) Visual response to time dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. J Opt Soc Am 51:422–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keysers C, Xiao D-K, Földiák P, Perrett DI (2001) The speed of sight. J Cogn Neurosci 13:90–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Harris A, Kanwisher N (2002) Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 5:910–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z-L, Jeon S-T, Dosher BA (2004) Temporal tuning characteristics of the perceptual template and endogenous cuing of spatial attention. Vision Res 44:1333–1350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei L, Fiorentini A (1973) The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. Vision Res 13:1255–1267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy G, Puce A, Belger A, Allison T (1999) Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 9:431–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W (1982) Visual neurones responsive to faces in monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res 47:329–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reich DS, Mechler F, Victor JD (2001) Temporal coding of contrast in primary visual cortex: when, what, and why. J Neurophysiol 85:1039–1050

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanskanen T, Näsänen R, Montez T, Päällysaho J, Hari R (2005) Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency. Cereb Cortex 15:526–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkiainen A, Helenius P, Hansen PC, Cornelissen PL, Salmelin R (1999) Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain 122:2119–2131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JP, Fagerholm P, Bonnet C (1999) One spatial filter limits speed of detecting low and middle frequency gratings. Vision Res 39:1683–1693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381:520–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Thompson ID (1981) The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res 41:414–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vassilev A, Mihaylova M, Bonnet C (2002) On the delay of processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation. Vision Res 42:851–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraten FAJ, Cavanagh P, Labianca AT (2000) Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Res 40:3651–3664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherill GB, Levitt H (1965) Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psych 18:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risto Näsänen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Näsänen, R., Ojanpää, H., Tanskanen, T. et al. Estimation of temporal resolution of object identification in human vision. Exp Brain Res 172, 464–471 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0354-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0354-5

Keywords

Navigation