Skip to main content
Log in

Unifying multisensory signals across time and space

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brain integrates information from multiple sensory modalities and, through this process, generates a coherent and apparently seamless percept of the external world. Although multisensory integration typically binds information that is derived from the same event, when multisensory cues are somewhat discordant they can result in illusory percepts such as the “ventriloquism effect.” These biases in stimulus localization are generally accompanied by the perceptual unification of the two stimuli. In the current study, we sought to further elucidate the relationship between localization biases, perceptual unification and measures of a participant’s uncertainty in target localization (i.e., variability). Participants performed an auditory localization task in which they were also asked to report on whether they perceived the auditory and visual stimuli to be perceptually unified. The auditory and visual stimuli were delivered at a variety of spatial (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°) and temporal (200, 500, 800 ms) disparities. Localization bias and reports of perceptual unity occurred even with substantial spatial (i.e., 15°) and temporal (i.e., 800 ms) disparities. Trial-by-trial comparison of these measures revealed a striking correlation: regardless of their disparity, whenever the auditory and visual stimuli were perceived as unified, they were localized at or very near the light. In contrast, when the stimuli were perceived as not unified, auditory localization was often biased away from the visual stimulus. Furthermore, localization variability was significantly less when the stimuli were perceived as unified. Intriguingly, on non-unity trials such variability increased with decreasing disparity. Together, these results suggest strong and potentially mechanistic links between the multiple facets of multisensory integration that contribute to our perceptual Gestalt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A, B
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bermant RI, Welch RB (1976) Effect of degree of separation of visual-auditory stimulus and eye position upon spatial interaction of vision and audition. Percept Mot Skills 42:487–493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson P, Aschersleben G (1998) Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychon Bull Rev 5:482–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson P, Radeau M (1981) Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Percept Psychophys 29:578–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choe CS, Welch RB, Gilford RM, Juola JF (1975) The “ventriloquist effect”: visual dominance or response bias? Percept Psychophys 18:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston WD, Wallace MT, Vaughan JW, Stein BE, Norris JL, Schirillo JA (2003) Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias. J Cogn Neurosci 15:20–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan PM (1985) Statistical algorithms: algorithm AS 217. Computation of the dip statistic to test for unimodality. Appl Stat 34:320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM (1985) The dip test of unimodality. Ann Stat 13:70–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Templeton WB (1966) Human Spatial orientation. Wiley, New York

  • Jack CE, Thurlow WR (1973) Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the “ventriloquism” effect. Percept Mot Skills 37:967–979

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J, Guski R (2003) Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. Cogn Brain Res 16:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J, Ehrenstein WH, Guski R (2001) Spatio-temporal constraints for auditory—visual integration. Behav Brain Res 121:69–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pick HL, Warren DH, Hay JC (1969) Sensory conflict in judgements of spatial direction. Percept Psychophys 6:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeau M, Bertelson P (1987) Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs: Thomas (1941) revisited. Psychol Res 49:17–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slutsky DA, Recanzone GH (2001) Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. Neuroreport 12:7–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

  • Stein BE, Wallace MT (1996) Comparisons of cross-modality integration in midbrain and cortex. Prog Brain Res 112:289–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Laurienti PJ, Wallace MT, Stanford TR (2002) Multisensory integration. In: Ramachandran V (ed) Encyclopedia of the human brain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–241

  • Thomas G (1941) Experimental study of the influence of vision on sound localisation. J Exp Psychol 28:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow WR, Jack CE (1973) Certain determinants of the “ventriloquism effect”. Percept Mot Skills 36:1171–1184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MT, Stein BE (1996) Sensory organization of the superior colliculus in cat and monkey. Prog Brain Res 112:301–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MT, Meredith MA, Stein BE (1992) Integration of multiple sensory modalities in cat cortex. Exp Brain Res 91:484–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MT, Wilkinson LK, Stein BE (1996) Representation and integration of multiple sensory inputs in primate superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 76:1246–1266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MT, Meredith MA, Stein BE (1998) Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat. J Neurophysiol 80:1006–1010

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren DH, Welch RB, McCarthy TJ (1981) The role of visual-auditory compellingness in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses. Percept Psychophys 30:557–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RB, Warren DH (1980) Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol Bull 88:638–667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Julie Edelson for editorial assistance. The study was supported in part by US National Institutes of Health grants MH63861, NS22543 and NS36916.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Wallace.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, M.T., Roberson, G.E., Hairston, W.D. et al. Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res 158, 252–258 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1899-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1899-9

Keywords

Navigation