Skip to main content
Log in

Electrolocation

II. The effects of moving objects and other electrical stimuli on the activities of two categories of posterior lateral line lobe cells inApteronotus albifrons

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Two categories of electroreceptive neurons of the posterior lateral line lobe (PLLL), termed E and I cells, were studied in the weakly electric fishApteronotus albifrons. The E cells respond with short latency, modal latency of 3.6 ms, to increases in electric organ discharge (EOD) amplitude with increased action potential frequency. The I cells responded after a longer time, modal latency of 6.8 ms, to the same stimulus with a decrease in spike frequency (Figs. 1 and 2). Mean spontaneous activity of the E cells was less than that of the I cells, 44 spikes/s compared to 59 spikes/s, and the E cells usually had a preferred phase of firing within the EOD cycle whereas the I cells did not (Fig. 2).

  2. 2.

    The mean responses of the E and I cells to various sized 1 Hz modulations of EOD amplitude were fit by power functions having exponents of 0.42 and 0.36, respectively (Fig. 10). The responses of E cells to AMs of different frequencies were similar to those of electroreceptors in that the most effective AM frequency was approximately 64 Hz. The I cells were most sensitive to lower AM frequencies, from 2 to 16 Hz, and the best AM frequency was dependent upon the stimulus intensity (Fig. 4). The absolute value of the responses, change in firing frequency, of either the E or the I cells was much lower than receptor responses to the same stimulus. However, evaluation of the differences in the sizes of the receptors' and the PLLL cells' responses along with estimates of the variances of measures of their spike frequency show that the E and I cells are approximately 16 times as sensitive as the receptors.

  3. 3.

    The E cells respond to moving metal objects with a strong increase in frequency followed by a rebound decrease and the I cells respond to plastic objects in the same manner. These responses decrease with increasing object distance lateral to the fish and the rate of this response decay is very close to that predicted on the basis of the cells responses to electronically produced AMs that have no movement component (Figs. 5 and 10).

  4. 4.

    The receptive fields of the E and I cells mapped with small spherical metal and plastic objects consist of an area of increased spike frequency followed by a decrease and these areas reflect the cells initial response to the object followed by a rebound response of opposite sign (Figs. 6 and 7). Additional regions of reduced activity boardering or preceding the main response area and differences in the amplitude of various components of the response dependent upon movement direction may be due to more complex receptive field properties.

  5. 5.

    The areas of the excitatory regions of these cells' receptive fields containing responses of at least 40% of the peak response averaged 85 mm2 for the E cells and 96 mm2 for the I cells and these areas are significantly larger than the same measures made on the receptors' fields. Approximately 6 to 15 electroreceptors are estimated to converge on a single E cell or on an I cell, via an inhibitory interneuron. This estimate is based on the differences in receptive field sizes and the density of receptors on the skin (Fig. 11) and this estimate agrees well with convergence estimates based on neuroanatomical methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM :

amplitude modulation

CV :

coeffcient ol variation

EOD :

electric organ discharge

FM :

frequency modulated

JAR :

jamming avoidance response

References

  • Bastian J (1975) Receptive fields of cerebellar cells receiving extero-ceptive input in a gymnotid fish. J Neurophysiol 38:285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J (1976) The range of electrolocation: a comparison of electroreceptor responses and the responses of cerebellar neurons in a gymnotid fish. J Comp Physiol 108:193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J (1981) Electrolocation. I. How the electroreceptors ofApteronotus albifrons code for moving objects and other electrical stimuli. J Comp Physiol 144:465–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J, Heiligenberg W (1980) Neural correlates of the jamming avoidance response ofEigenmannia. J Comp Physiol 136:135–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrend K (1977) Processing information carried in a high frequency wave: properties of cerebellar units in a high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 118:357–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH (1969) Species differences in effect of electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav Evol 2:85–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Hamstra RH, Scheich H (1972) The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 77:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Enger PS, Szabo T (1965) Activity of central neurons involved in electroreception in some weakly electric fish. J Neurophysiol 28:800–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1973) Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish,Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). J Comp Physiol 87:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Bastian J (1980) The control ofEigenmannia's pacemaker by distributed evaluation of electroreceptive afferences. J Comp Physiol 136:113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins CD (1976) Stimulus filtering and electroreception: tuberous electroreceptors in three species of gymnotid fish. J Comp Physiol 111:171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Langner G, Scheich H (1978) Active phase coupling in electric fish: behavioral control with microsecond precision. J Comp Physiol 128:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Larimer JL, MacDonald JA (1968) Sensory feedback from electroreceptors to electromotor pacemaker centers in gymnotids. Am J Physiol 214:1253–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Maler L (1979) The posterior lateral line lobe of certain gymnotid fish: quantitative light microscopy. J Comp Neurol 183:323–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Maler L, Sas EKB, Rogers J (1981) The cytology of the posterior lateral line lobe of high frequency weakly electric fish (Gymnoti- dae): Dendritic differentiation and synaptic specificity in a simple cortex. J Comp Neurol 195:87–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubara J (1980) Neural correlates of a non-jammable electrolocation system. Abstr 207.3, 10th Annual Meeting, Society for Neurosciences

  • Matsubara J, Heiligenberg W (1978) How well do electric fish electrolocate under jamming? J Comp Physiol 125:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreery DB (1977) Spatial organization of receptive fields of lateral lemniscus neurons of the lateral line lobe of the catfishIctalurus nebulosus. J Comp Physiol 113:341–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H (1977) Neural basis of communication in the high frequency electric fish,Eigenmannia virescens (jamming avoidance response). J Comp Physiol 113:181–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. The principles and practices of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 246–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo T (1965) Sense organs of the lateral line system in some electric fish of the Gymnotidae, Mormyridae and Gymnarchidae. J Morphol 117:229–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A, Takeda K (1963) The change of discharge frequency by A.C. stimulus in a weakly electric fish. J Exp Biol 40:56–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Drs. J. Matsubara, W. Heiligenberg, C. Hopkins, L. Maler, T.H. Bullock, and C. Bell for many useful suggestions concerning this work. I also thank P. Barton and J. Sims for help with the manuscript. Supported by NIH Grant RUINS-12337.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bastian, J. Electrolocation. J. Comp. Physiol. 144, 481–494 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326833

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326833

Keywords

Navigation