Summary
Light-dependent motor activity and phototactic behavior was investigated in 1) untreated, 2) blinded, and 3) blinded and pinealectomized eels (Anguilla anguilla L.). Neither blinding nor blinding combined with pinealectomy interfered with the observed nocturnal motor activity or the photonegative behavior characteristic for the untreated animals. However, an aluminum foil covering the skull of blinded animals altered the light-dependent motor activity pattern in contrast to blinded animals bearing a transparent plastic foil cover. Blinded animals with an aluminum foil covering the brain case exhibited a motor activity pattern resembling arrhythmicity.
The motor activity pattern of 1) untreated, 2) blinded, as well as 3) blinded and pinealectomized eels followed an inversed light regime with a latency of about two days indicating that in the eel light is the dominatingZeitgeber triggering circadian motor activity patterns. The reported findings speak in favor of the existence of photosensitive areas in addition to the lateral eyes and the epiphysis cerebri. From the results of the covering experiments it is clear that these unknown photoreceptor sites must be located in the brain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aschoff, J.: Zeitgeber der tierischen Tagesperiodik. Naturwissenschaften41, 49–56 (1954)
Andreasson, S.: Locomotor activity patterns ofCottus poecilopus Heckel andCottus gobio L. (Pisces). Oikos20, 78–94 (1969)
Bagnara, J.T., Hadley, M.E.: Endocrinology of the amphibian pineal. Amer. Zool.10, 201–216 (1970)
Bohun, S., Winn, H.E.: Locomotor activity of the American eel (Anguilla rostrata). Chesapeake Sci.7, 137–147 (1966)
Dodt, E.: Photosensitivity in the teleost,Salmo irideus (Gibbson). Experientia (Basel)19, 642–643 (1963)
Dodt, E.: The parietal eye (pineal and parietal organs) of lower vertebrates. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/3B (R. Jung, ed), pp. 113–140. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973
Eriksson, L.-O.: Tagesperiodik geblendeter Bachsaiblinge. Naturwissenschaften59, 219–220 (1972a)
Eriksson, L.-O.: Die Jahresperiodik augenloser und pinealorganloser BachsaiblingeSalvelinus fontinalis Mitchell. Aquilo Ser. Zool.13, 8–12 (1972b)
Eriksson, L.-O.: Diel and annual locomotor activity rhythms in some fresh water fish species with special reference to the seasonal inversion in salmonids. Akademisk Avhandling, Umeå 1975
Frisch, K. von: Beiträge zur Physiologie der Pigmentzellen in der Fischhaut. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol.138, 319–387 (1911)
Hamasaki, D.J., Eder, D.J.: Adaptive radiation of the pineal system. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/5 (F. Crescitelli, ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1976 (in press)
Hoffmann, K.: Temperaturzyklen als Zeitgeber der circadianen Periodik. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges., Suppl.36, 265–274 (1968)
Kalleberg, H.: Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. andSalmo trutta L.). Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm39, 55–98 (1958)
Menaker, M.: Extraretinal light perception in the sparrow. I. Entrainment of the biological clock. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)59, 414–421 (1968)
Menaker, M.: Synchronization with the photic environment via extraretinal receptors. In: Biochronometry (M. Menaker, ed.), pp. 315–322. Washington: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971
Müller, K.: Die Tages- und Jahresperiodik der Bachforelle (Salmo trutta L.) am Polarkreis. Aquilo Ser. Zool.8, 50–62 (1969)
Müller, K.: Die Tages- und Jahresperiodik der BuntflossenkoppeCottus poecilopus (Heckel am Polarkreis, Oikos Suppl.13, 108–121 (Copenhagen 1970)
Müller, K.: Ålens årsrytmik vid polcirkeln. Fauna och flora67, 235–236 (1972)
Müller, K.: Seasonal phase shift and the duration of activity time in the burbot,Lota lota (L.) (Pisces, Gadidae). J. comp. Physiol.84, 357–359 (1973)
Müller, K., Schreiber, K.: Eine Methode zur Messung der lokomotorischen Aktivität von Süßwasserfischen. Oikos18, 135–136 (1967)
Motte, I. de la: Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Physiologie der Lichtempfindlichkeit geblendeter Fische. Z. vergl. Physiol.49, 58–90 (1964)
Oksche, A., Hartwig, H.G.: Photoneuroendocrine systems and the third ventricle. In: Brain-endocrine-interaction II. The ventricular system. (K.M. Knigge et al., eds.), pp. 40–53. Basel: Karger 1975
Oksche, A., Kirschstein, H.: Weitere elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen am Pinealorgan vonPhoxinus laevis L. (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Z. Zellforsch.112, 572–588 (1971)
Richardson, N.E., McCleave, J.D.: Locomotor activity rhythms of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in various light conditions. Biol. Bull.147, 422–432 (1974)
Rüdeberg, C.: Structure of the pineal organs ofAnguilla anguilla L. andLebistes reticulatus Peters (Teleostei). Z. Zellforsch.122, 227–243 (1971)
Scharrer, E.: Die Lichtempfindlichkeit blinder Elritzen. (Untersuchungen über das Zwischenhirn der Fische). Z. vergl. Physiol.7, 1–38 (1928)
Schwassmann, H.O.: Biological rhythms. In: Fish physiology, Vol. VI (W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall, eds.), pp. 371–428. New York: Academic Press 1971
Ueck, M.: Vergleichende Betrachtungen zur neuroendokrinen Aktivität des Pinealorgans. Fortschr. Zool.22, 167–203 (1974)
Westin, L.: Locomotor activity patterns of fourhorn sculpin,Myxocephalus quadricornis (L.) (Pisces). Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm51, 184–196 (1971)
Wever, R.: Virtual synchronization towards the limits of the range of the entrainment. J. theor. Biol.36, 119–132 (1972)
Wurtman, R.J., Axelrod, J., Kelly, D.E. (eds.): The pineal. New York-London: Academic Press 1968
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors are indepted to Dr. Patrick Meurling and Dr. L.O. Eriksson for fruitful discussions and critical remarks, to Mrs. Verena Kreis and Mrs. Kirsten Thörneby for technical assistance, and to Dr. R.L. Snipes for critically reading the English manuscript
Supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (-Ha 726/2−)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Veen, T., Hartwig, H.G. & Müller, K. Light-dependent motor activity and photonegative behavior in the eel (Anguilla anguilla L.). J. Comp. Physiol. 111, 209–219 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605532
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605532