Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination and matching within and between hues measured by reaction times: some implications for categorical perception and levels of information processing

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Same-different reaction times (RTs) were obtained for pairs of color samples ranging perceptually from blue to green. In Experiment 1, observers responded with “same” if both stimuli in a pair were from the same hue category (i.e., blue-blue or green-green) or “different” if the two stimuli were from different hue categories (i.e., blue-green or green-blue). RT for “same” responses was faster for pairs of physically identical stimuli (A-A) than for pairs of physically different stimuli (A-a) belonging to the same hue. RT for “different” responses was faster for larger physical differences across a boundary between hues (A-B 6 step) than for smaller physical differences (A-B 2 step). Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings: In one phase observers matched pairs of stimuli as “same” or “different” by categorical similarity as in Experiment 1, and in a second phase observers matched the same stimulus pairs, this time by physical similarity. Matching by categorical similarity replicated the pattern of results found in Experiment 1. Matching by physical similarity showed that RTs for “different” responses were equivalently fast independent of the physical difference between A-B pairs, but were faster for A-B than for A-a comparisons. Further, matching identity was faster under categorical match instructions than under physical match instructions. Results of the two experiments support a model of parallel processing of physical and categorical stimulus information in color perception. Further, these reaction-time data and their implications in color perception (for hues) parallel reaction-time data and their implications in speech perception (for phonemes).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beare, A.C. (1963). Color-name as a function of wave-length. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H. (1979). Perceptual development: Stability and change in feature perception. In: Bornstein M.H., Kessen W. (Eds.), Psychological Development from Infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., & Korda, N.O. (1984). Some psychological parallels between categorization processes in vision and in audition. In: Harnad, S. (Ed.), Categorical Perception. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., & Monroe, M.D. (1980). Chromatic information processing: Rate depends on stimulus location in the category and psychological complexity. Psychological Research, 42, 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R.M. (1979). Human Color Vision. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R.M., & Gordon, J. (1965). Bezold-Brücke hue shift measured by color-naming technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 55, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C.H. (1965). Discriminations that depend on wavelength. In: Graham, C.H. (Ed.), Vision and Visual Perception. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V.L. (1977). Within-category discriminations in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P., & Darwin, C.J. (1977). Some properties of auditory memory for rapid formant transitions. Memory & Cognition, 5, 700–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara, S. (1968). Test for Colour-Blindness. Tokyo: Shuppan

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni, D.B., & Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M.I. (1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. In: Bower, G.H., Spence, J.T. (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M.I., & Mitchell, R.F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 71, 392–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, L.A., Maital, S., & Bornstein, M.H. (1983). Perceptual categorization of color: A life-span study. Psychological Research, 45, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A.M., & Stevens, K.N. (1963). Reaction time to synthetic stop consonants and vowels at phoneme centers and at phoneme boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.C. (1974). Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A.A. (1972). Psychometric and psychophysical hue discrimination functions for the pigeon. Vision Research, 12, 1447–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W.D. (1947). Researches on Normal and Defective Color Vision. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information & Control, 8, 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A.C. (1982). What really is turquoise? A note on the evolution of color terms. Psychological Research, 44, 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bornstein, M.H., Korda, N.O. Discrimination and matching within and between hues measured by reaction times: some implications for categorical perception and levels of information processing. Psychol. Res 46, 207–222 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308884

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308884

Keywords

Navigation