Skip to main content
Log in

Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single cell activity was recorded from the primate putamen, caudate nucleus, and globus pallidus during a precued reaching movement task. Two monkeys were trained to touch one of several target knobs mounted in front of them after an LED was lighted on the correct target. A precue was presented prior to this target “go cue” by a randomly varied delay interval, giving the animals partial or complete advance information about the target for the movement task. The purpose of this design was to examine neuronal activity in the major structures of the basal ganglia during the preparation phase of limb movements when varying amounts of advance information were provided to the animals. The reaction times were shortest with complete precues, intermediate with partial precues, and longest with precues containing no information, demonstrating that the animals used precue information to prepare partly or completely for the reaching movement before the target go cue was given. Changes in activity were seen in the basal ganglia during the preparatory period in 30% of neurons in putamen, 31% in caudate nucleus, and 27% in globus pallidus. Preparatory changes were stronger and more closely linked to the time of movement initiation in putamen than in caudate nucleus. Although the amount of information contained in the precues had no significant effect on preparatory activity preceding the target go cue, a directional selectivity during this period was observed for a subset of neurons with preparatory changes (15% in putamen, 11% in caudate nucleus, 14% in globus pallidus) when the precue contained information about the upcoming direction of movement. A smaller subset of neurons showed selectivity for the preparation of movement amplitude. A larger number of preparatory changes showed selectivity for the direction or amplitude of movement following the target go cue than in the delay period before the cue. The intensity of preparatory changes in activity in many cases depended on the length of the delay interval preceding the target go cue. Even following the target go cue, the intensity of the preparatory changes in activity continued to be significantly influenced by the length of the preceding delay interval for 11% of changes in putamen, 8% in caudate nucleus, and 18% in globus pallidus. This finding suggests that preparatory activity in the basal ganglia takes part in a process termed motor readiness. Behaviorally, this process was seen as a shortening of reaction time regardless of precue information for trials in which the delay interval was long and the animals showed an increased readiness to move. Preparatory activity in putamen following the target go cue was most intense in trials with a short delay interval, in which motor readiness had not achieved its maximum level prior to the go cue. The results of this study indicate that the basal ganglia are involved in multiple aspects of preparatory processing for limb movement. Preparatory processing is therefore unlikely to be divided anatomically along the functional lines examined in this study. In the basal ganglia, preparatory processing reflects both preparation for target selection and control of timing the onset of movement (motor readiness). These characteristics can be integrated in a functional scheme in which the basal ganglia are predominantly responsible for the automated execution of well-trained behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams RA, Meyer DE, Kornblum S (1990) Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 16:248–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge JW, Gilman S, Jones D (1988) A microdrive positioning adapter for chronic single unit recording. Physiol Behav 44:821–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander GE (1987) Selective neuronal discharge in monkey putamen reflects intended direction of planned limb movements. Exp Brain Res 67:623–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander GE, Crutcher MD (1990a) Preparation for movement: neural representations of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 64:133–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander GE, Crutcher MD (1990b) Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 64:164–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brotchie P, Iansek R, Horne MK (1991) Motor function of the monkey globus pallidus. 2. Cognitive aspects of movement and phasic neuronal activity. Brain 114:1685–1702

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D, Kelso JA (1980) Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. J Exp Psychol [Gen] 109:475–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Sakamoto M, Usui S (1989) Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. III. Activities related to expectation of target and reward. J Neurophysiol 61:814–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger D, Gilman S, Aldridge JW (1990) A multiwire microelectrode for single unit recording in deep brain structures. J Neurosci Meth 32:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimm J, Sutton D (1973) Foreperiod effects on human single motor unit reaction times. Physiol Behav 10:539–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD (1982) The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia: the Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 32:514–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Neafsey EJ, Hull CD, Buchwald NA (1978) Preparation for movement in the cat. II. Unit activity in the basal ganglia and thalamus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:714–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi P, Keskinen E (1980) Visual stimulus intensity and location probability: interactive effects on choice reaction time. Scand J Psychol 21:175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi P, Naatanen R (1981) Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psych Bull 89:133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol [Gen] 109:444–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Barnes HJ, Slotta JD (1988) In defense of the advance specification hypothesis for motor control. Psychol Res 50:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W, Romo R (1988) Neuronal activity in the monkey striatum during the initiation of movements. Exp Brain Res 71:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan MR, Flowers KA, Hurrell J (1987) Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson's disease. Brain 110:1247–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltysik S (1975) Single unit activity in basal ganglia of monkeys during performance of a delayed response task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers WAC, Walter A (1985) Response processing stages in choice reactions. Acta Psychol 58:191–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Worringham CJ, Strand EA (1986) Movement preparation in Parkinson's disease. The use of advance information. Brain 109:1179–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo J, Cowan WM (1984) A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the cynomologus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J Comp Neurol 222:265–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaeger, D., Gilman, S. & Aldridge, J.W. Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement. Exp Brain Res 95, 51–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229653

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229653

Key words

Navigation