Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of chemoreceptors to quinine on the cell surface of Paramecium caudatum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The topological distribution of the chemoreceptors to quinine in the membrane of a ciliate Paramecium caudatum were examined by conventional electrophysiological techniques. A CNR-mutant specimen defective in voltage-gated Ca channels produced a transient depolarization followed by a transient hyperpolarization and a sustained depolarization when 1 mM quinine-containing solution was applied to its entirety. A Ni2+-paralyzed CNR-mutant specimen produced a simple membrane depolarization in response to a local application of 1 mM quinine-containing solution to its anterior end, whereas it produced a transient membrane hyperpolarization in response to an application to its posterior end. An anterior half fragment of a CNR specimen produced a membrane depolarization whereas a posterior half fragment of the specimen produced a transient hyperpolarization upon application of 1 mM quinine-containing solution. Both anterior depolarization and posterior hyperpolarization took place prior to the contraction of the cell body. It is concluded that Paramecium caudatum possesses two kinds of chemoreceptors or two kinds of coupling of the same receptor to different signal transduction pathways to quinine which are distributed in different locations on the cell surface. Activation of the anterior receptor produces a sustained depolarizing receptor potential while activation of the posterior receptor produces a transient hyperpolarizing receptor potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CNR :

caudatum non reversal

References

  • Doroszewski M (1961) Reception area and polarization of ciliary movement in ciliate Dileptus. Acta Biol Exp 21: 15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryl S (1973) Chemotaxis in ciliate Protozoa. In: Perez-Miravete A (ed) Behaviour of microorganisms. Plenum Press, New York, pp 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert R, Sibaoka T (1968) The flash-triggering action potential of the luminscent dinoflagellate Noctiluca. J Gen Physiol 52: 258–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings HS (1906) Behavior of the lower organisms. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznicki L (1963) Reversible immobilization of Paramecium caudatum evoked by nickel ions. Acta Protozool 1: 301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Machemer H, Ogura A (1979) Ionic conductances of membranes in ciliated and deciliated Paramecium. J Physiol (Lond) 296: 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Naitoh Y (1982) Protozoa. In: Shelton GAB (ed) Electrical conduction and behavior in ‘simple’ invertebrates. Clarendon Press, Oxford pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Naitoh Y (1984) Mechanosensory transduction in protozoa. In: Colombetti G, Lenci F (eds) Membrane and sensory transduction. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Naitoh Y, Eckert R (1969) Ionic mechanisms controlling behavioral responses of Paramecium to mechanical stimulation. Science 164: 963–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Naitoh Y, Eckert R, Friedman K (1972) A regenerative calcium response in Paramecium. J Exp Biol 56: 667–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakazato H, Naitoh Y (1993) Quantitative analysis of chemoaccumulation in specimens of Paramecium caudatum in relation to their motile activities. J Exp Biol 176: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Oami K (1996) Membrane potential responses controlling chemodispersal of Paramecium caudatum from quinine. J Comp Physiol A 178: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Oami K, Naitoh Y (1989) Bioelectric control of effector responses in the marine dinoflagellate, Noctiluca miliaris. Zool Sci 6: 833–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Oami K, Sibaoka T, Naitoh Y (1988) Tentacle regulating potentials in Nactiluca miliaris: their generation sites and ionic mechanisms. J. Comp Physiol A 162: 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston RR, Van Houten J (1987a) Chemoreception in Paramecium: acetate- and folate-induced membrane hyperpolarization. J Comp Physiol A 160: 525–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston RR, Van Houten J (1987b) Localization of chemoreceptive properties of the surface of Paramecium. J Comp Physiol A 160: 537–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi M, Haga N, Hennessy T, Hinrichsen RD, Hara R (1985) A gamma ray-induced non-excitable membrane mutant in Paramecium caudatum: a behavioral and genetic analysis. Genet Res Camb 46: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga T, Naitoh Y (1992) Membrane potential responses to thermal stimulation and the control of thermoaccumulation in Paramecium caudatum. J Exp Biol 164: 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten J (1978) Two mechanisms of chemotaxis in Paramecium. J Comp Physiol 127: 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten J (1992) Chemosensory transduction in eucaryotic microorganisms. Annu Rev Physiol 54: 639–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten J, Hansma H, Kung C (1975) Two quantitative assays for chemotaxis in Paramecium. J Comp Physiol 104: 211–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oami, K. Distribution of chemoreceptors to quinine on the cell surface of Paramecium caudatum . J Comp Physiol A 179, 345–352 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194988

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194988

Key words

Navigation