Regular Article
Strategies Used by Hippocampal- and Caudate-Putamen-Lesioned Rats in a Learning Task,☆☆,

https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1996.3761Get rights and content

Abstract

In rats, hippocampal lesions result in impairment of spatial navigation, although other learning abilities remain unaltered. When learning a left/right discrimination task, rats can use a spatial strategy (with external maze landmarks—Situation 1) or are forced to use an egocentric strategy (without external or internal maze cues—Situation 2). Little is known about the extrahippocampal systems involved in the utilization of egocentric strategy. It is suggested that striatum could play an important role in the learning abilities that are spared after hippocampal lesion. The aim of our study was to investigate which strategy is used by rats bearing hippocampal or caudate-putamen lesions in the acquisition of a left/right discrimination task in an elevated T-maze in both Situations 1 and 2. We also investigated the effect of each lesion on the reversal of discrimination in both situations. Acquisition was not altered in any of the situations; however, a transfer test showed that hippocampal-lesioned rats used a different strategy (egocentric) from control animals (spatial) in Situation 1. In addition, reversal of the discrimination was impaired in Situation 2. Caudate-putamen lesion produced a transient effect on reversal of discrimination only in the egocentric task (Situation 2), but did not impair acquisition of the task in either situation, thus suggesting that the animals were able to use either strategy.

References (41)

  • L.R. Squire et al.

    Memory: Brain systems and behavior

    Trends in Neuroscience

    (1988)
  • L. Abraham et al.

    Evidence for caudate nucleus involvement in an egocentric spatial task: Return from passive transport

    Physiological Psychology

    (1983)
  • D.F. Benson et al.

    The amnestic syndrome of posterior cerebral artery occlusion

    Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

    (1974)
  • N.J. Cohen

    Preserved learning capacity in amnesia: Evidence for multiple memory systems

    The neuropsychology of memory

    (1984)
  • R.E. Correll et al.

    Effect of medial temporal lesions on visual discrimination performance

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1965)
  • R.L. Isaacson et al.

    The effect of radical hippocampal ablation on acquisition of an avoidance response

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1961)
  • R.P. Kesner et al.

    Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: Triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1993)
  • D.P. Kimble

    The effects of bilateral hippocampal lesions in rats

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1963)
  • D.P. Kimble et al.

    Hippocampectomy and response perseveration in the rat

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1965)
  • D.P. Kimble et al.

    Hippocampectomy and behavior sequences

    Science

    (1963)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Behavioral toxicity of nerve agents

      2020, Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents
    • Lesions of the hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum disrupt distinct aspects of spatial navigation strategies based on proximal and distal information in a cued variant of the Morris water task

      2015, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This was unexpected result given the fact that other reports found no deficits in acquisition for HPC rats in visible or cued platform versions of the MWT [7]. One possible explanation is that the extent of the hippocampal lesions in the current study involved almost complete damage to the hippocampus, while other studies have focused on the dorsal hippocampus [32] or the fimbria/fornix [6]. It may also be the case that excessive damage to the overlying cortex might also explain this defect (see Fig. 2).

    • Behavioral Toxicity of Nerve Agents

      2015, Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    An abstract version of this study was presented at the 17th Annual Meeting of the European Neuroscience Association held in Vienna, Austria, September 4–8, 1994.

    ☆☆

    Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to Maria Gabriela M. Oliveira at Departamento de Psicobiologia, EPM, UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 862-1 andar, Vila Clementino, São Paulo-SP 04023-062, Brazil. Fax: (55-11) 572-5092. E-mail: [email protected].

    L. R. SquireN. Butters, Eds.

    2

    This research was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Psicofarmacologia (AFIP). M.G.M.O. and O.F.A.B. are recipients of fellowships from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı́fico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and A.C.P. from FAPESP. The authors thank Dr. Deborah Suchecki for her suggestions on the manuscript.

    View full text