Table 3.

Summary of statistics.

Table analyzedStatistical testp valueSize effectt valuedfR2F value
WT vs KOBrdU countsUnpaired Student’s t test0.84690.600.49480.0299.72
p = 0.049
BrdU-Prox1 colocalizationUnpaired Student’s t test0.67840.230.365280.0165.473
p = 0.1284
% Newborn neuronsUnpaired Student’s t test0.22140.190.298380.0111.266
p = 0.8249
Nestin-Ki67-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.03761.882.65860.54088.054
p = 0.1204
Nestin-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test.02912.022.85160.5751.639
p = 0.6947
Ki67Unpaired Student’s t test0.03332.472.7560.55761.015
p = 0.9903
Length of the first branchUnpaired Student’s t test0.16580.231.3931490.01281.284
p = 0.2817
Number of nodesUnpaired Student’s t test0.00010.653.9391490.09431.617
p = 0.0406
DA cumulative lengthUnpaired Student’s t test0.11170.261.61490.01691.133
p = 0.5929
DA spanUnpaired Student’s t test0.00320.492.9671490.055783.387
p = 0.0001
Sholl analysis
Intersection effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,4023) = 2.488
Row effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,4023) = 163.7
Column effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(1,4023) = 37.46
Spine densityUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00011.134.1631070.13941.016
p = 0.9479
E3 vs E4BrdU CountsUnpaired Student’s t test0.89610.0940.13570.0026122.668
p = 0.4463
BrdU-Prox1 colocalizationUnpaired Student’s t test0.58380.400.57470.044983.759
p = 0.3053
% Newborn neuronsUnpaired Student’s t test0.10971.221.83270.3241.234
p = 0.8143
Nestin-Ki67-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.4860.520.741960.61851.875
p = 0.6185
Nestin-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.37000.690.968960.13511.191
p = 0.8891
Ki67Unpaired Student’s t test0.27950.841.18960.19062.6
p = 0.4533
Length of the first branchUnpaired Student’s t test0.89490.0230.1321420.0001231.09
p = 0.7196
Number of nodesUnpaired Student’s t test0.00070.593.4721420.078261.408, p = 0.1542
DA cumulative lengthUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00010.74.1271420.10711.783, p = 0.0166
DA SpanUnpaired Student’s t test0.59780.090.5281420.0019651.296, p = 0.2749
Sholl analysis
Intersection effectTwo-way ANOVA0.0013F(26,3834) = 2.048
Row effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,3834) = 144.7
Column effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(1,3834) = 112.8
Spine densityUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00011.135.278880.24052.08
p = 0.0173
  • D, Dendritic arborization. Cohen’s d value was calculated as Embedded Image with Embedded Image , d = 0.2, d = 0.5, and d = 0.8 corresponding to small, medium, and large size effects, respectively