Table 2.

Statistical table

FigureStatistical testNStatistical significance
1EUnpaired t test, two-tailedTMPase: N = 6TMPase: p < 0.0001
Cell areaCGRP: N = 5CGRP+,NF200-: p < 0.0001
   CGRP+,NF200+: p = 0.4803
Table 3Unpaired t test, two-tailedN = 5–6See Table 3
Cell distribution   
2BUnpaired t test, two-tailedAdult: N = 6Adult control vs adult Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0047
Axon diameter P29: N = 5P29 control vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0442
   Adult control vs P29 control: p = 0.318
   Adult Nav-Tsc2 vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0258
2CUnpaired t test, two-tailedAdult: N = 6Adult control vs adult Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0055
Axons >1 micron P29: N = 5P29 control vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.2076
   Adult control vs P29 control: p = 0.4211
   Adult Nav-Tsc2 vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0125
2DUnpaired t test, two-tailedAdult: N = 6Adult control vs adult Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0371
Axons/bundle P29: N = 5P29 control vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0747
   Adult control vs P29 control: p = 0.5018
   Adult Nav-Tsc2 vs P29 Nav-Tsc2: p = 0.0202
3CUnpaired t test, two-tailedN = 5TuJ1: p < 0.0001
Skin innervation   
3FUnpaired t test, two-tailedN = 5Lamina I: p = 0.0403
GFP density  Lamina II: p = 0.0002
5C,F,G,LUnpaired t test, two-tailedN = 5Total neurons: p = 0.081
DRG neuron SP: N = 6NF200 total: p = 0.314
counting  SP total: p = 0.0006
   CGRP+,NF200-: p < 0.0001
   CGRP+,NF200+: p = 0.0007
   TrkA+,NF200-: p < 0.0001
   TrkA+,NF200+: p = 0.0005
   IB4 total: p = 0.0001
   IB4+,NF200+: p = 0.0037
6CUnpaired t test, two-tailedN = 4 whole DRGNav1.8: p = 0.0613
qPCR of N = 3 FACS-sorted samplesTrkA: p = 0.0015
FACS-sorting  TrkB: p = 0.9758
   TrkC: p = 0.0020
   Prx: p = 0.1784
   Egr2: p = 0.5834
8AUnpaired t test, two-tailedFemale: N = 13Female: p = 0.2513
von Frey Male: N = 12Male: p = 0.462
8BUnpaired t test, two-tailedFemale: N = 6 control, N = 4 cKOFemale: p = 0.2390
Cold plantar male: N = 11 control, N = 10 cKOMale: p = 0.2102
8CUnpaired t test, two-tailedFemale: N = 13Female: p = 0.0046
Hargreaves Male: N = 9Male: p = 0.0337
8DTwo-way RM ANOVAControl: N = 9Interaction: F(5,75) = 1.82; p = 0.1191
Female CCI Nav-Tsc2: N = 8Time: F(5,75) = 10.04; p < 0.0001
   Genotype: F(1,15) = 9.032; p = 0.0089
8DSidak’s multipleControl: N = 9BL: adjusted p > 0.9999
Female CCIcomparison testNav-Tsc2: N = 8POD 4: adjusted p = 0.269
   POD 6: adjusted p = 0.9896
   POD 20: adjusted p = 0.9209
   POD 27: adjusted p = 0.0071
   POD 34: adjusted p = 0.0836
8ETwo-way RM ANOVAControl: N = 11Interaction: F(5,75) = 0.7719; p = 0.5723
Male CCI Nav-Tsc2: N = 10Time: F(5,95) = 4.873; p = 0.0005
   Genotype: F(1,19) = 3.403; p = 0.0807
8ESidak’s multipleControl: N = 11BL: adjusted p > 0.9999
Male CCIcomparison testNav-Tsc2: N = 10POD 4: adjusted p = 0.9992
   POD 6: adjusted p = 0.9998
   POD 20: adjusted p = 0.3652
   POD 27: adjusted p = 0.236
   POD 34: adjusted p = 0.8045
8FTwo-way RM ANOVAControl: N = 17Interaction: F(4,128) = 1.03; p = 0.3946
Rotarod Nav-Tsc2: N = 17Trial number: F(4,128) = 60.26; p < 0.0001
   Genotype: F(1,32) = 4.08; p = 0.0518
8FSidak’s multipleControl: N = 17Trial 1: adjusted p = 0.8576
Rotarodcomparison testNav-Tsc2: N = 17Trial 2: adjusted p = 0.8396
   Trial 3: adjusted p = 0.2686
   Trial 4: adjusted p = 0.0812
   Trial 5: adjusted p = 0.1971
8GUnpaired t test, two-tailedControl: N = 23p = 0.8027
Open field activity Nav-Tsc2: N = 23 
8HTwo-way RM ANOVAControl: N = 23Interaction: F(1,43) = 2.62; p = 0.1129
Pole climb down Nav-Tsc2: N = 22Trial number: F(1,43) = 4.516; p = 0.0394
   Genotype: F(1,43) = 0.04254; p = 0.8376
8HSidak’s multipleControl: N = 23Trial 1: adjusted p = 0.84
Pole climb downcomparison testNav-Tsc2: N = 22Trial 2: adjusted p = 0.606