Table 3.

Gephyrin binding enthalpies and binding entropies of GlyR β-loop variants determined by ITC

Parameterβ-Loop variantTwo-site model9One-site model10
High-affinity siteLow-affinity site
ΔH [kcal/mol]1βL-wt (pH 8.0)3–19.2 ± 1.6–2.1 ± 0.3***
βL-LO4–11.8 ± 2.5
βL-Core5–11.0 ± 0.6***
βL-HI6–21.5 ± 0.3***
βL-D407P/F408G7–13.8 ± 3.2
βL-wt (pH 7.4)8–14.2 ± 1.9–4.9 ± 0.9
ΔS [cal/mol * K]2βL-wt (pH 8.0)3–28.4 ± 5.319.5 ± 1.4
βL-LO4–6.7 ± 3.5
βL-Core5–11.2 ± 2.0
βL-HI6–40.3 ± 1.1
βL-D407P/F408G7–21.7 ± 11
βL-wt (pH 7.4)8–14.2 ± 6.38.3 ± 4.2
  • Mean values and SEM from three or more independent measurements.

  • 1Binding enthalpy (ΔH in kcal/mol).

  • 2Binding entropy (ΔS in cal/mol * K).

  • 3GlyR β-loop residues 378–426, pH 8.0.

  • 4GlyR β-loop residues 378–413.

  • 5GlyR β-loop residues 394–413.

  • 6GlyR β-loop residues 394–426.

  • 7GlyR β-loop residues 378–426 with substitution D407P and F408G.

  • 8GlyR β-loop residues 378–426, pH 7.4.

  • 9Binding isotherm fitted to a two-site interaction with gephyrin.

  • 10Binding isotherm fitted to a one-site model; Data were compared using an unpaired two-tailed t-test: *** p = 0.0005 ΔH of βL-wt high-affinity site n = 3 vs. low-affinity site n = 3; *** p = 0.0001 ΔH of βL-wt high-affinity site n = 3 vs. βL-Core n = 9; *** p < 0.0001 ΔH of βL-Core n = 9 vs. βL-HI n = 4; p = 0.6921 ΔH of βL-Core n = 9 vs. βL-LO n = 5.