Table 2.

Statistical analyses performed in all experiments

FigureData structureType of testStatistical results
2, left panelNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc testF(2,18) = 10.06/p = 0.0012
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+Ep > 0.05 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
2, right panelNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc testF(2,24) = 7.237/p = 0.0035
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+Ep < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.001
3, left panelNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSDpost hoc testF(2,15) = 6.74295.00% CI/p = 0.0082
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E0.0873 to 0.7120.1827 to 0.757/p = 0.0156 /p = 0.0033
3, right panelNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSDpost hoc testF(2,16) = 4.92195.00% CI/p = 0.0216
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E0.0179 to 0.751-0.485 to 0.184/p = 0.0409 /p = 0.3540
4ANormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc test
Rostral-lateral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Rostral-dorsal DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Rostral-Ventral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Rostral-Total DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+EF(2,14) = 4.363   F(2,13) = 1.445   F(2,15) = 7.104   F(2,15) = 6.304/p = 0.0337 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 /p = 0.2712 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 /p = 0.0068 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.001 /p = 0.0103 p < 0.001 p < 0.05 p > 0.05
4BNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc test
Mid-lateral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Mid-dorsal DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Midl-Ventral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Mid-Total DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+EF(2,13) = 5.039   F(2,15) = 4.992   F(2,14) = 7.030   F(2,14) = 13.30/p = 0.0240 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.05 /p = 0.0218 p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 /p = 0.0077 p < 0.001 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 /p = 0.0006 p < 0.0001 p < 0.001 p > 0.05
4CNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc test
Caudal-lateral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Caudal-dorsal DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Caudal-Ventral DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+E Caudal-Total DRN O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+EF(2,11) = 0.994   F(2,10) = 3.956   F(2,11) = 12.61   F(2,9) = 9.990p = 0.4009 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 /p = 0.05 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.05 /p = 0.0014 p < 0.001 p > 0.05 p < 0.001 /p = 0.0052 p < 0.001 p > 0.05 p < 0.05
5ANormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSD post hoc testF(2,23) = 1.17295.00% Cl/p = 0.3276
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E-0.164 to 0.5585-0.1589 to 0.5858/p = 0.3476 /p = 0.3157
5BNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSD post hoc testF(2,21) = 0.807895.00% CI/p = 0.4592
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E-1.125 to 0.4039-0.7755 to 0.7531/p = 0.4415 /p = 0.9991
5CNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc testF(2,20) = 9.697/p = 0.0011
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+Ep < 0.001 p < 0.0001 p > 0.05
5DNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSD post hoc testF(2,21) = 0.207395.00% CI/p = 0.8144
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E-0.4267 to 0.3285-0.3241 to 0.431/p = 0.9333 /p = 0.9216
5ENormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVAFisher's LSD post hoc testF(2,16) = 10.9595.00% CI/p = 0.0010
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+E-0.6103 to 0.3933-1.433 to -0.3916/p = 0.8228 /p = 0.0012
5FNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVANewman–Keuls post hoc testF(2,16) = 4.797/p = 0.0233
O+O vs VCD+OO+O vs VCD+EVCD+O vs VCD+Ep < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.05