Table 2.

Statistical analysis

FigureGroupParameternCI95Data structureComparisonType of testp/r 2 value
5VWT/no-MD and VWT/MD-reopening[A] no-MD – VA % gain[B] MD – VA % gain56[9.692; 53.92][11.10; 57.88]Normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B]Unpaired t testp = 0.8328
6AVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA[B] long-term VA55[0.4854; 0.6263][0.5755; 0.8913]Normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B]Paired t testp = 0.0171*
6AVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA[B] VA during MD[C] long-term VA11/611/66[0.5927; 0.6849][0.5339; 0.7873][0.7901; 0.9986]Normal distributionAssumed normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B] (11/11)[B] vs [C] (6/6)[A] vs [C] (6/6)Paired t testPaired t testPaired t testp = 0.7291p = 0.0471*p = 0.0088**
6BVWT/no-MD[A] standard OPT thr[B] long-term OPT thr55[0.3822; 0.4110][0.3763: 0.4101]Normal distributionAssumed normal distribution[A] vs [B]Paired t testp = 0.3310
6BVWT/MD[A] standard OPT thr[B] OPT thr during MD[C] long-term OPT thr11/611/66[0.3831; 0.4072][0.4220; 0.4646][0.3795; 0.4363]Normal distributionNormal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B] (11/11)[B] vs [C] (6/6)[A] vs [C] (6/6)Paired t testPaired t testPaired t testp = 0.0002 ***p = 0.0289*p = 0.0783
6DVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA/OPT thr[B] long-term VA/OPT thr55NANANANAVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.2210r 2 = 0.2347
6DVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA/OPT thr[B] VA/OPT thr during MD[C] long-term VA/OPT thr11116NANANANANANAVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrCorrelationCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.0026r 2 = 0.0180r 2 = 0.0266
7CVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA[B] long-term VA55NANANANAVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.0741r 2 = 0.4973
7CVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA[B] VA during MD[C] long-term VA11116NANANANANANAVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialCorrelationCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.1353r 2 = 0.1131r 2 = 0.0289
9AVWT andSC-OI[A] VWT/no-MD-OI[B] VWT/MD-OI[C] SC/no-MD-OI[D] SC/MD-OI4554[0.2754; 0.5196][-0.0677;0.1597][0.2492; 0.3908][0.04208; 0.1829]UnknownNormal distributionNormal distributionUnknown[A] vs [B][C] vs [D][A] vs [C][B] vs [D]Mann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–Whitneyp = 0.0159*p = 0.0159*p = 0.2187p = 0.2663
9BVWT andSC-OI[A] VWT/no-MD-OI, contra[B] VWT/no-MD-OI, ipsi[C] VWT/MD-OI, contra[D] VWT/MD-OI, ipsi[E] SC/no-MD-OI, contra[F] SC/no-MD-OI, ipsi[G] SC/MD-OI, contra[H] SC/MD-OI, ipsi44555544[1.649; 2.286][0.8821; 1.013][0.8455; 1.946][0.7713; 2.373][1.325; 1.915][0.7865; 1.150][0.7516; 1.878][0.9528; 1.487]UnknownUnknownNormal distributionNormal distributionNormal distributionNormal distributionUnknownUnknown[A] vs [B][C] vs [D][E] vs [F][G] vs [H][A] vs [C][B] vs [D][E] vs [G][F] vs [H]Mann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–Whitneyp = 0.0286*p = 0.8413p = 0.0079**p = 0.6857p = 0.0317*p = 0.1905p = 0.2857p = 0.0851
  • The table lists from left to right the figures referred to, groups compared (group), parameters analyzed (parameter), number of animals (n), lower (left) and upper (right) 95% confidence interval of the mean (CI95), distribution of the values (data structure), comparisons of (sub)groups abbreviated as indicated in the parameter column (comparison), test applied for the comparison (type of test), and statistical readout (p/r 2 value). OPT thr, OPT threshold; ipsi and contra, ipsilateral and contralateral eye; NA, not assessable; s/trial, seconds required per correct trial near the break. Significance levels were set as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.