Reliability of excitatory responses
| Comparison | Test | p value | Median control (C) | Median mint (M) | Median hexanal (H) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio of successful trials | C; N = 225 | M; N = 268 | H; N = 369 | ||
| All odors combined; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| All odors combined; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 | |
| All odors combined; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 | |
| All odors combined; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.0836 | 1 | 1 | |
| AP all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| AP; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| AP; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| AP; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.0029 | 1 | 1 | |
| EB all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0181 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EB; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.0151 | 1 | 1 | |
| EB; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.5476 | 1 | 1 | |
| EB; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.2351 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 1%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0596 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Hexanal 1%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.7821 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 1%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.0562 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 1%; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.6464 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanone; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.1165 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Hexanone; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.1277 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanone; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.3668 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanone; H vs M | Dunn's | >0.9999 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 1% all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0902 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IAA 1%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.4431 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 1%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.0867 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 1%; H vs M | Dunn's | >0.9999 | 1 | 1 | |
| MS 1%
all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0139 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| MS 1%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.0621 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 1%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.0144 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 1%; H vs M | Dunn's | >0.9999 | 1 | 1 | |
| PA all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| PA; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| PA; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| PA; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.0019 | 1 | 1 | |
| THA all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| THA; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| THA; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| THA; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.9588 | 1 | 1 | |
| MS 5%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| MS 5%; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 5%; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 5%; H vs M | Dunn's | >0.9999 | 1 | 1 | |
| MS 10%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
| MS 10%; C vs M | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 10%; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 0.75 | 1 | |
| MS 10%; H vs M | Dunn's | >0.9999 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 5%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0016 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Hexanal 5%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.4815 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 5%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.0014 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 5%; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.1031 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 10%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0001 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Hexanal 10%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.0001 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 10%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.0029 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hexanal 10%; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.81 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 5%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IAA 5%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.0026 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 5%; C vs H | Dunn's | <0.0001 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 5%; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.4956 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 10%; all groups | Kruskal--Wallis | 0.0007 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IAA 10%; C vs M | Dunn's | 0.0007 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 10%; C vs H | Dunn's | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | |
| IAA 10%; H vs M | Dunn's | 0.8374 | 1 | 1 |
Comparisons of excitatory response reliability from control, mint-, and hexanal-exposed groups. Data shown in Figure 6.