Table 6.

Statistical values

 Statistical values Data structure Type of test Power For all multiple comparisons tests, reported p is adjusted p value Figure 2 Distribution of responses; all groups; p = 6.65E-199 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis KW statistic: 912.64 Distribution of responses; C vs M; p approximates 0 Non-normal Tukey's 95% CI: -1.8211 to -1.4263 Distribution of responses; C vs H; p approximates 0 Non-normal Tukey's 95% CI: -2.5607 to -2.1911 Distribution of responses; H vs M; p approximates 0 Non-normal Tukey's 95% CI: -0.9273 to -0.577 Figure 3 Excitation amplitude; IAA 10%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA 10%; C (med: 0.216) vs M (0.3547); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 10%; C vs H (med: 0.3697); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 10%; H vs M; p = 0.0842 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA 1%; C (med: 0.2018) vs M (0.2389); p = 0.0656 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 1%; C vs H (0.3306); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 1%; H vs M; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; AP; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; AP; C (med: 0.1081) vs M (0.1837); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; AP; C vs H (med: 0.2822); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; AP; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 10%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS 10%; C (med: 0.1026) vs M (0.1961); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 10%; C vs H (med: 0.2566); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 10%; H vs M; p = 0.0022 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA 5%; C (med: 0.1404) vs M (0.2386); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 5%; C vs H (med: 0.2973); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA 5%; H vs M; p = 0.0022 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 1%; C (med: 0.2409) vs M (0.3421); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 1%; C vs H (med: 0.4718); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 1%; H vs M; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; EB; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; EB; C (med: 0.2262) vs M (0.3254); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; EB; C vs H (0.3204); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; EB; H vs M; p = 0.5796 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS 1%; C (med: 0.1167) vs M (0.1641); p = 0.0027 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 1%; C vs H (med: 0.1933); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 1%; H vs M; p = 0.0224 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; PA; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; PA; C (med: 0.0733) vs M (0.2004); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; PA; C vs H (med: 0.2511); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; PA; H vs M; p = 0.0224 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS 5%; C (med: 0.0777) vs M (0.1796); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 5%; C vs H (med: 0.2503); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS 5%; H vs M; p = 0.6994 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanone; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; Hexanone; C (med: 0.3185) vs M (0.4161); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanone; C vs H (med: 0.421); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanone; H vs M; p = 0.6994 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 10%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 10%; C (med: 0.2438) vs M (0.3768); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 10%; C vs H (med: 0.3778); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 10%; H vs M; p = 0.9842 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; THA; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; THA; C (med: 0.1171) vs M (0.2183); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; THA; C vs H (med: 0.2415); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; THA; H vs M; p = 0.2338 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 5%; C (med: 0.2758) vs M (0.3534); p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 5%; C vs H (med: 0.5212); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; Hexanal 5%; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Figure 4, concentration comparisons Non-normal Control group Non-normal Excitation amplitude; MS; all conc.; p = 0.0586 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% (med: 0.1167) vs 5% (0.0777); p = 0.0454 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.1026); p = 0.4478 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.4695 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; all conc.; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% (med: 0.2018) vs 5% (0.1404); p = 0.0027 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.216); p = 0.6607 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; all conc.; p = 0.0214 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% (med: 0.2409) vs 5% (0.2758); p = 0.1412 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.2438); p = 0.6965 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.0189 Non-normal Tukey's Mint group Excitation amplitude; MS; all conc.; p = 0.206 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% (med: 0.1641) vs 5% (0.1796); p = 0.0179 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.1961); p = 0.1441 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.6787 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; all conc.; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% (med: 0.2389) vs 5% (0.2386); p = 0.9919 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.3547); p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; all conc.; p = 0.3426 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% (med: 0.3421) vs 5% (0.3534); p = 0.6541 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.3768); p = 0.3137 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.8335 Non-normal Tukey's Hexanal group Excitation amplitude; MS; all conc.; p = 0.0184 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% (med: 0.1933) vs 5% (0.2503); p = 0.0136 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 1% vs 10% (med: 0.2566); p = 0.2275 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; MS; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.4712 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; all conc.; p = 0.0433 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% (med: 0.3306) vs 5% (0.2973); p = 0.7292 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 1% vs 10% (0.3697); p = 0.2089 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; IAA; 5% vs 10%; p = 0.0382 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; all conc.; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% (0.4718) vs 5% (0.5212); p = 0.2589 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 1% vs 10% (0.3778); p = 0.0127 Non-normal Tukey's Excitation amplitude; hexanal; 5% vs 10%; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Figure 5 Ratio of excitatory events; all odors; p < 0.0001 Normal ANOVA Ratio of excitatory events; all odors: C (med: 0.88) vs M (0.9235); p < 0.0001 Normal Tukey's Ratio of excitatory events; all odors: C vs H (med: 0.9377); p < 0.0001 Normal Tukey's Ratio of excitatory events; all odors: H vs M; p = 0.1313 Normal Tukey's Ratio of activating odors; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Ratio of activating odors; C (med: 13) vs, M (14); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Ratio of activating odors; C vs H (med: 14); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Ratio of activating odors; H vs M; p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Figure 6 Successes; AP; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; AP; C (med: 0.75) vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; AP; C vs H (med: 1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; AP; H vs M; p = 0.0029 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; EB; all groups; p = 0.0181 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; EB; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.0151 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; EB; C vs H (1); p = 0.5476 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; EB; H vs M; p = 0.2351 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 1%; all groups; p = 0.0596 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; Hexanal 1%; C (med: 1) vs M (med: 1); p = 0.7821 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 1%; C vs H (med: 1); p = 0.0562 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 1%; H vs M; p = 0.6464 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanone; all groups; p = 0.1165 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; Hexanone; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.1277 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanone; C vs H (1); p = 0.3668 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanone; H vs M; p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 1%; all groups; p = 0.0902 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; IAA 1%; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.4431 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 1%; C vs H (1); p = 0.0867 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 1%; H vs M; p > 0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 1%; all groups; p = 0.0139 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; MS 1%; C (med: 0.75) vs M (1); p = 0.0621 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 1%; C vs H (1); p = 0.0144 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 1%; H vs M; p > 0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; PA; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; PA; C (med: 0.75) vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; PA; C vs H (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; PA; H vs M; p = 0.0019 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; THA; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; THA; C (med: 0.75); vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; THA; C vs H (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; THA; H vs M; p = 0.9588 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; MS 5%; C (med: 0.75) vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 5%; C vs H (med: 1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 5%; H vs M; p > 0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 10%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; MS 10%; C (med: 0.75) vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 10%; C vs H (med: 1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; MS 10%; H vs M; p > 0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 5%; all groups; p = 0.0016 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; Hexanal 5%; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.4815 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 5%; C vs H (med: 1); p = 0.0014 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 5%; H vs M; p = 0.1031 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 10%; all groups; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; Hexanal 10%; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 10%; C vs H (med: 1); p = 0.0029 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; Hexanal 10%; H vs M; p = 0.81 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; IAA 5%; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.0026 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 5%; C vs H (med: 1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 5%; H vs M; p = 0.4956 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 10%; all groups; p = 0.0007 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; IAA 10%; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p = 0.0007 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 10%; C vs H (med: 1); p = 0.01 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; IAA 10%; H vs M; p = 0.8374 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; All odors combined; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Successes; All odors combined; C (med: 1) vs M (1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; All odors combined; C vs H (med: 1); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Successes; All odors combined; H vs M, p = 0.0836 Non-normal Dunn's Figure 7 Comparison of ranks; AP; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; AP; C (med: 5) vs M (4); p = 0.4176 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; AP; C vs H (med: 6); p = 0.0002 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; AP; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; EB; all groups; p = 0.0176 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; EB; C (med: 10) vs M (10); p = 0.2086 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; EB; C vs H (med: 11); p = 0.0138 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; EB; H vs M; p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; Hex 1%; C (med: 10) vs M (10); p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 1%; C vs H (med: 12); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 1%; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hexanone; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; Hexanone; C (med: 13) vs M (11); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hexanone; C vs H (med: 11); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hexanone; H vs M; p = 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; IAA 1%; C (med: 9) vs M (6); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 1%; C vs H (med: 7); p = 0.0004 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 1%; H vs M; p = 0.0065 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 1%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; MS 1%; C (med: 5) vs M (3); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 1%; C vs H (med: 3); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 1%; H vs M; p = 0.0391 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; PA; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; PA; C (med: 4) vs M (5); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; PA; C vs H (med: 7); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; PA; H vs M; p = 0.0908 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; THA; all groups; p = 0.0028 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; THA; C (med: 5) vs M (5); p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; THA; C vs H (med: 4); p = 0.0234 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; THA; H vs M; p = 0.0071 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; MS 5%; C (med: 4) vs M (6); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 5%; C vs H (med: 5); p = 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 5%; H vs M; p = 0.4328 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 10%; all groups; p = 0.0731 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; MS 10%; C (med: 5) vs M (5); p>0.999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 10%; C vs H (4); p = 0.1503 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; MS 10%; H vs M; p = 0.1864 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 5%; all groups; p = 0.1561 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; IAA 5%; C (med: 7) vs M (7); p = 0.3965 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 5%; C vs H (med: 6); p = 0.1912 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 5%; H vs M; p>0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 10%; all groups; p = 0.3245 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; IAA 10%; C (med: 10) vs M (9); p = 0.6739 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 10%; C vs H (med: 9); p = 0.4643 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; IAA 10%; H vs M; p > 0.999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 5%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; Hex 5%; C (med: 12) vs M (12); p > 0.9999 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 5%; C vs H (med: 12); p = 0.0012 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 5%; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 10%; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Kruskal--Wallis Comparison of ranks; Hex 10%; C (med: 9) vs M (12); p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 10%; C vs H (9); p = 0.7317 Non-normal Dunn's Comparison of ranks; Hex 10%; H vs M; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Dunn's Figure 8 Habituation; all groups; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Friedman Test Friedman statistic: 46.52 Habituation; Pre vs 5 min Post; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Habituation; Pre vs 30 min Post; p < 0.0001 Non-normal Tukey's Habituation; 5 vs 30 min Post; p > 0.9999 Non-normal Tukey's