Table 3.

A summary of statistical analyses

LineDependent variableTestStatisticConfidence
aAverage endpoint hand angles during last epoch of the baseline phase for all groups in experiment 1Two-way ANOVAStructure_F(1,36) = 0.60, report_F(1,36) = 4.12, interaction_F(1,36) = 0.20Structure_partial η2 = 0.01, p = 0.4441; report_partial η2 = 0.1, p = 0.0498; interaction_partial η2 = 0.01, p = 0.6579
bAverage endpoint hand angles for nostructure-noreport and nostructure-report groups during last epoch of the baseline phase and average endpoint hand angles for the exposure phasePaired t testNostructure-noreport_t(9) = -0.77Nostructure-noreport _CI: −0.8441/0.4141, p = 0.4593; nostructure-report_CI: 0.2853/2.9324, p = 0.0225
Nostructure-report_t(9) = 2.75
cCorrelation coefficients for exposure phase endpoint hand angles and rotation solutions for structure-report and structure-noreport groupsTwo-sample t testt(18) = 2.94CI: 0.0699/
0.4207, p = 0.0088
dEndpoint hand angle-solution regression slopes for structure-report and structure-noreport groupsOne-sample t testStructure-report_t(9) = 14.90, structure-noreport_t(9) = 7.40Structure-report _CI: 0.6139/0.8336, p = 1.1967e-07; structure-noreport_CI: 0.3582/0.6735, p = 4.0938e-05
eEndpoint hand angle-solution regression slopes for structure-report and structure-noreport groupsTwo-sample t testt(18) = 2.45CI: 0.0294/0.3864, p = 0.0249
fAiming angle-solution regression slope for structure-report groupOne-sample t testt(9) = 13.31CI: 0.6063/0.8546, p = 3.1703e-07
gImplicit angle-solution regression slope for structure-report groupOne-sample t testt(9) = −0.12CI: −0.0463/0.0418, p = 0.9106
hAverage endpoint hand angles for all groups in experiment 1 during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseTwo-way ANOVAStructure_F(1,36) = 5.31, report_F(1,36) = 4.17, interaction_F(1,36) = 6.54Structure_partial η2 = 0.13, p = 0.0271; report_partial η2 = 0.10, p = 0.0484; interaction_partial η2 = 0.15, p = 0.0149
iAverage aiming angles for structure-report and nostructure-report groups during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseTwo-sample t testt(18) = −1.41CI: −0.2087/1.0525, p = 0.1769
jAverage endpoint hand angles during first epoch of the test phase for all groups in experiment 1Two-way ANOVAStructure_F(1,36) = 36.28, report_F(1,36) = 0.21, interaction_F(1,36) = 2.38Structure_partial η2 = 0.50, p = 6.48e-07; report_partial η2 = 0.01, p = 0.648; interaction_partial η2 = 0.06, interaction_ p = 0.132
kAverage aiming angles and implicit angles during first epoch of the test phase for structure-report and nostructure-report groupsOne-way MANOVAF(1,18) = 24.60Pillai’s trace = 0.74, p = 9.582e-06
lBaseline-subtracted, average endpoint hand angles during first epoch of the no-feedback washout phase for all groupsTwo-way ANOVAStructure_F(1,36) = 3.55, report_F(1,36) = 0.57, interaction_F(1,36) = 0.55Structure_partial η2 = 0.09, p = 0.0677; report_partial η2 = 0.02, p = 0.4541; interaction_partial η2 = 0.02, p = 0.4620
mAverage endpoint hand angles in experiment 2 during last epoch of the baseline phase for all groupsOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.76Partial η2 = 0.04, p = 0.4764
nAverage endpoint hand radii in experiment 2 during last epoch of the baseline phase for all groupsOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 4.44Partial η2 = 0.19, p = 0.0182
oAverage control group endpoint hand angles during last epoch of the baseline phase and exposure phasePaired t testt(13) = 2.64CI: 0.2869/2.8518, p = 0.0203
pCorrelation coefficients for exposure phase reach performance and perturbation solutions for gain and rotation groupsTwo-sample t testt(26) = −2.10CI: 0.0034/0.3221, p = 0.0456
qExposure phase reach-solution regression slopes for gain and rotation groupsOne-sample t testGain_t(13) = 6.88,Gain_CI: 0.2296/0.4396, p = 1.1109e-05; rotation_CI: 0.3739/0.6463, p = 1.9788e-06
Rotation_t(13) = 8.09
rExposure phase reach-solution regression slopes for gain and rotation groupsTwo-sample t testt(26) = −2.20CI: −0.3391/−0.0119, p = 0.0365
sAverage endpoint hand angles for all groups in experiment 2 during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 1.3Partial η2 = 0.06, p = 0.2850
tAverage aiming angles for all groups in experiment 2 during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 5.63Partial η2 = 0.22, p = 0.0071
uAverage endpoint hand radii for all groups in experiment 2 during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.68Partial η2 = 0.03, p = 0.5109
vAverage aiming radii for all groups in experiment 2 during last epoch of the feedback-washout phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.79Partial η2 = 0.04, p = 0.4608
wAverage endpoint hand angles for all groups during first epoch of the test phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 15.36Partial η2 = 0.44, p = 1.2049e-05
xReaching radii for all groups during first epoch of the test phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.11Partial η2 = 0.01, p = 0.8956
yAiming radii for all groups during first epoch of the test phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.19Partial η2 = 0.01, p = 0.8317
zAverage aiming angles for all groups during first epoch of the test phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 10.90Partial η2 = 0.36, p = 1.7326e-04
aaAverage implicit angles for all groups during first epoch of the test phaseOne-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 0.99Partial η2 = 0.05, p = 0.3816
bbAverage aiming angles and average endpoint hand angles during first epoch of test phasePaired t testsRotation_t(13) = 0.35,Rotation_CI:−5.0710/3.6744, p = 0.7356; gain_CI: −6.6180/15.0414, p = 0.4160; control_CI: −4.9148/1.2700, p = 0.2253
gain_t(13) = −0.84,
control_t(13) = 1.27
ccAverage aiming angles and average endpoint hand angles during first epoch of test phasePearson correlationsRotation_r = 0.78,Rotation_CI: 0.4269/0.9272, rotation_p = 0.0010; gain_CI: 0.5874/0.9523, p = 0.0001; control_CI: 0.7427/0.9726, p = 5.0555e-06
gain_r = 0.85,
control_r = 0.91
  • The first column specifies the superscript letter used to identify the statistical test within the manuscript, the second column lists the dependent variable on which the test is conducted, the third column lists the type of test used, the fourth column shows the test statistic, and the final column provides a measure of confidence appropriate for the type of test conducted.