Table 2.

Statistical significance for area peak fractional decrease

PointData structureType of testPowerSignificance
t-5 vs t50
41NormalPaired two-tailed t test0
42NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0123*
43NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0482*
44NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0518
45NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0304*
46NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.014*
47NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0142*
48NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0187*
49NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0207*
50NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0293*
51NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0921
52NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.1104
53NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0437*
54NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0442*
55NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0275*
56NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0309*
57NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0327*
58NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0254*
59NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0304*
t-5 vs t80
61NormalPaired two-tailed t test0
62NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.055
63NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0579
64NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0435*
65NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0276*
66NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0223*
67NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0348*
68NormalPaired two-tailed t test0.0362*
  • Significance power of statistical analysis of paired two-tailed t test of the peak area, comparing the first peak of the 100 Hz train stimulation to the rest 18 peaks. *p < 0.05. (N = 7 control, 11 toxin).