Statistical differences among the samples illustrated in Figure 7
| Location | Data reference | Data structure | Type of test | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | Fig. 7C | Nonnormal distribution | Wilcoxon matched pairs test | |
| WT, KCC2rab vs. WT, Tub | z = 1.89, n = 5; p = 0.031 | |||
| WT, KCC2rab vs. ΔNTD, KCC2rab | z = 1.89, n = 5; p = 0.031 | |||
| ΔNTD, KCC2rab vs. ΔNTD, Tub | z = –0.27, n = 5; p = 0.69 | |||
| b | Fig. 7D | Nonnormal distribution | Wilcoxon matched pairs test | |
| WT, KCC2chk vs. WT, Tub | z = 2.10, n = 6; p = 0.016 | |||
| WT, KCC2chk vs. ΔCTD, KCC2chk | z = –1.26, n = 6; p = 0.92 | |||
| ΔCTD, KCC2chk vs. ΔCTD, Tub | z = –2.10, n = 6; p = 0.016 |