Table 2:

Summary of statistical analyses for data shown in Figures 3–7

	Type of test^*	Analysis	Test value^#	p value	Observed power
a	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,8) = 0.03	0.88	0.052
b	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,7) = 4.23	0.08	0.427
c	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,6) = 3.59	0.11	0.358
d	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,8) = 15.1	0.005	0.923
e	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, trial	F_(1.65,15.7) = 7.96	0.007	0.861
f	Two-way RM ANOVA	Interaction, odor port × trial	F_(1.97,15.7) = 6.56	0.009	0.841
g	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4	F_(1,8) = 15.2	0.005	0.925
h	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4	F_(1,8) = 12.0	0.009	0.856
i	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,8) = 7.46	0.026	0.668
j	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,8) = 1.79	0.218	0.219
k	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, trial	F_(2.8,22.7) = 2.50	0.088	0.528
l	Two-way RM ANOVA	Interaction, odor port × trial	F_(5,40) = 4.08	0.004	0.924
m	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,8) = 0.14	0.722	0.062
n	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,8) = 10.3	0.012	0.802
o	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 1 and 2	F_(1,8) = 17.6	0.003	0.955
p	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,8) = 205.0	0.0001	1.000
q	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trial 4	F_(1,8) = 63.6	0.0001	1.000
r	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,8) = 83.1	0.0001	1.000
s	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4	F_(1,8) = 4.85	0.059	0.491
t	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,7) = 33.3	0.0007	0.998
u	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4	F_(1,7) = 22.4	0.002	0.980
v	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4	F_(1,7) = 2.05	0.195	0.237
w	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, trial	F_(5,35) = 7.88	0.0001	0.998
x	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,7) = 0.009	0.925	0.051
y	Two-way RM ANOVA	Interaction, odor port × trial	F_(5,35) = 1.30	0.285	0.404
z	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,7) = 10.4	0.014	0.790
aa	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,7) = 10.3	0.015	0.785
bb	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,7) = 0.026	0.876	0.052
cc	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,7) = 53.6	0.0002	1.000
dd	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trial 4	F_(1,7) = 47.4	0.0002	1.000
ee	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,7) = 36.4	0.001	0.999
ff	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4	F_(1,7) = 0.136	0.282	0.173
gg	t test (paired)	Third water trial vs first IMU trial	t₆ = 2.66	0.04	0.604
hh	t test (paired)	Third IMU trial vs first EFU trial	t₆ = 4.12	0.006	0.926
ii	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,6) = 43.1	0.0006	1.000
jj	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, trial	F_(4,24) = 10.2	0.0001	0.999
kk	Two-way RM ANOVA	Interaction, odor port × trial	F_(4,24) = 17.7	0.0001	1.000
ll	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4	F_(1,6) = 17.3	0.006	0.931
mm	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,7) = 36.2	0.001	0.998
nn	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4	F_(1,6) = 3.45	0.113	0.347
oo	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, odor port	F_(1,6) = 1.85	0.223	0.210
pp	Two-way RM ANOVA	Main effect, trial	F_(2.17,13.0) = 2.62	0.107	0.445
qq	Two-way RM ANOVA	Interaction, odor port × trial	F_(2.3,14.0) = 3.03	0.075	0.526
rr	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,6) = 2.38	0.174	0.256
ss	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5	F_(1,6) = 3.76	0.101	0.372
tt	Two-way RM ANOVA	Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6	F_(1,6) = 1.87	0.221	0.212
uu	t test (paired)	Timed: intromissions, laser-ON vs laser-OFF	t₆ = 0.389	0.711	0.063
vv	t test (paired)	Triggered: intromissions, laser-ON vs laser-OFF	t₆ = 3.27	0.017	0.777

↵Letters in first column refer to tests shown in the Results. RM, repeated measures.
↵* All tests based on normal distribution.
# Tests that violated the sphericity assumption are shown after Hunyh-Feldt correction.