Bermejo et al. (1996) | Knutsen et al. (2005) | Voigts et al. (2015) | Ritt et al. (2008) | O'Connor et al. (2010) | Gyory et al. (2010) | Perkon et al. (2011) | EMG | Pixy (our method) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tracking principle | Opto | Video | Video | Video | Video | Video | Video | Muscle | Opto/video |
2 | Spatial element | Single point | Multiple points | Multiple points | Multiple points | Multiple points | Multiple points | Multiple points | NA | Multiple points |
3 | Real time | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
4 | Individual whisker | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
5 | Number of single identifiablewhiskers | One whisker on each side | One whisker on each side | One whisker on each side | Three whiskers | Five whiskers | N/A | N/A | NA | Two whiskers (up to seven in principle) |
6 | Whisker removal | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A | No | No |
7 | Limitation | Whisker thickness | Contrast andresolution | Contrast and resolution | Contrast and resolution | Contrast and resolution | Contrast and resolution | Contrast and resolution | NA | Illumination and color |
8 | Method shows | Single whisker | Single row | C1-4 whiskers | Single whiskers | Multiple whiskers | Two rows | Full whisker pad | Whisker pad | Two whiskers/one whisker and two pad/two paws |
9 | Head tracking | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
10 | Head tracking requirement | N/A | Additional light source for the eye | Tip of nose | Contour edge/whisker base | N/A | No requirement | No requirement | Wire in muscle | Marker glued to head |
11 | Compatible in IR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (single whisker) |
12 | Algorithm flexibility | Yes (not automatic) | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (with wires) | Yes |
13 | Unrestrained animal | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (whole animal) |
Here we compare 13 different features of 7 earlier tracking methods, including optoelectronic (Opto), electromyography (EMG), and other whisker tracking algorithms combined with high-speed videography to our Pixy based method. The elements that we compared here: 1) Tracking principle: Tracking algorithms based on videography, optoelectronic methods like beam breaking, EMG or color. 2) Spatial coordinate system: Beam breaking has a distinct (single or multiple) spatial coordinate, while videography can track over multiple spatial locations. 3) Real-time at any frequency. 4, 5, 6) Number of objects tracked: A single whisker, or multiple individual whiskers, with or without plucking or removing whiskers. 7) Limiting element of each method: Lighting, contrast, resolution and length of whiskers for videography, or color and painting for Pixy, 8) Output: Single whisker, multiple whisker or whisker and whisker pad. 9, 10) Head direction tracking method: possibility, and whether the eye need or tip of the nose or a color needs to be tracked. 11) Ability to tack in infrared red light: All the high speed cameras can work with infrared light, as can EMG and optoelectronic methods. The pixy camera is limited in this context because it can only be used to track a single spatially distinct point with a pixy camera. 12) The flexibility in tracking multiple body parts: Cameras can be used for tracking any object, but optoelectronic methods, and EMGs, and even automated tracking video systems have to be optimized or positioned for tracking the object of interest. 13) The ability to use the system in unrestrained animals.