Table 1:

Statistics

SubscriptData structureType of testPower
aHypergeometricFisher's exact95% CI = 1.4–491.2
bHypergeometricFisher's exact95% CI = 23.8–58.0
cHypergeometricFisher's exact95% CI = 3.2–1229.8
dApproximately normalWelch t test95% CI = −3.3 to −1.6, alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
eNon-normalEmpirical p valueNA
fNon-normalSpearman rank correlationNA
gApproximately normalWelch t testNA; no specific p values reported, rather a group of genes under a specified p value threshold
hApproximately normalWelch t test95% CI = −3.0 to −0.1, alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
iApproximately normalWelch t test95% CI = −1.3 to −0.1, alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
jApproximately normalWelch t test95% CI = 0.3–1.6, alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
kApproximately normalWelch t testNA; no specific p values reported, rather a group of genes above a specified p value threshold (e.g., not significant)
lApproximately normalWelch t test, one-sided (due to specific prior hypothesis as to direction of effect; results still significant using a two-sided test at a threshold of α = 0.05)95% CI = 0.1 to ∞], alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
mNon-normalχ2 test of ODS countsNA