Statistics.
Line | Location | Type of test | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
a | Table 2 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (gestation length) | 0.3 |
b | Table 2 | Two-tailed unpaired t test (litter size) | 0.9 |
c | Table 2 | Bonferroni’s post hoc test (body weight at P4) | 1.0 |
d | Table 2 | Bonferroni’s post hoc test (body weight at P14) | 1.0 |
e | Table 2 | Bonferroni’s post hoc test (body weight at P21) | 1.0 |
f | Table 2 | Bonferroni’s post hoc test (body weight at P28) | 1.0 |
g | Table 2 | Bonferroni’s post hoc test (body weight at P60) | 1.0 |
h | Fig. 2A | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 13.2; p < 0.0001 |
i | Fig. 2A | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 6.9; p = 0.01 |
j | Fig. 2A | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 8 s | p = 0.04 |
k | Fig. 2A | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 1 s | p = 0.0001 |
l | Fig. 2B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 178.2; p < 0.0001 |
m | Fig. 2B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 2.3; p = 0.1 |
n | Fig. 2B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration X treatment) | F(7,203) = 5.3; p < 0.0001 |
o | Fig. 2B | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 8 s | p <0.0001 |
p | Fig. 2C | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 26.7, p < 0.0001 |
q | Fig. 2C | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 0.2; p = 0.6 |
r | Fig. 2C | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration × treatment) | F(7,203) = 2.8; p = 0.009 |
s | Fig. 2C | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 8 s | p = 0.005 |
t | Fig. 2D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 38.4; p < 0.0001 |
u | Fig. 2D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 7.1; p = 0.01 |
v | Fig. 2D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration × treatment) | F(7,203) = 3.2; p = 0.003 |
w | Fig. 2D | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 1.2 s | p = 0.04 |
x | Fig. 2D | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 1.0 s | p < 0.0001 |
y | Fig. 2E | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 58.6; p < 0.0001 |
z | Fig. 2E | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 0.8; p = 0.4 |
aa | Fig. 2F | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 430.1; p < 0.0001 |
ab | Fig. 2F | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 0.01; p = 0.9 |
ac | Fig. 3A | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 73.1; p < 0.0001 |
ad | Fig. 3A | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 1.3; p = 0.3 |
ae | Fig. 3A | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration × treatment) | F(7,203) = 2.5; p = 0.02) |
af | Fig. 3A | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 8 s | p = 0.001 |
ag | Fig. 3B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (stimulus duration) | F(7,203) = 42.8; p < 0.0001 |
ah | Fig. 3B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,29) = 5.6; p = 0.03 |
ai | Fig. 3B | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 1.6 s | p = 0.02 |
aj | Fig. 3B | Bonferroni’s post hoc test at 1.0 s | p = 0.04 |
ak | Table 3 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (capacitance) | p = 0.002 |
al | Table 3 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (input resistance) | p = 0.09 |
am | Table 3 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (resting membrane potential) | p = 0.5 |
an | Table 3 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (spike amplitude) | p = 0.8 |
ao | Fig. 4A | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.009 |
ap | Fig. 4B | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (current injected × treatment) | F(10,1930) = 4.7; p < 0.0001 |
aq | Fig. 4B (rising phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (current injected) | F(3,579) = 922.1; p < 0.0001 |
ar | Fig. 4B (rising phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,193) = 4.9; p = 0.03 |
as | Fig. 4B (rising phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (current injected × treatment) | F(3,579) = 2.3; p = 0.07 |
at | Fig. 4B (descending phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (current injected) | F(3,579) = 144.3; p < 0.0001 |
au | Fig. 4B (descending phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,193) = 4.2, p = 0.04 |
av | Fig. 4B (descending phase) | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (current injected × treatment) | F(3,579) = 0.3; p = 0.8 |
aw | Fig. 4D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA on log-transformed data (current injected) | F(1,174) = 56.4; p < 0.0001 |
ax | Fig. 4D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA on log-transformed data (treatment) | F(1,174) = 5.2; p = 0.02 |
ay | Fig. 4D | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA on log-transformed data (current injected × treatment) | F(1,174) = 0.04; p = 0.8 |
az | Fig. 4D | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (at 100 pA) | p = 0.03 |
ba | Fig. 4D | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (at 250 pA) | p = 0.04 |
bb | Fig. 5A | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.01 |
bc | Fig. 5B | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test | p = 0.008 |
bd | Fig. 5C1 | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (time) | F(11,1419) = 30.5; p < 0.0001 |
be | Fig. 5C1 | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,1419) = 35.8; p < 0.0001 |
bf | Fig. 5C2 | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.01 |
bg | Fig. 5C3 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test | p = 0.01 |
bh | Table 4 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (frequency) | p = 0.6 |
bi | Table 4 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (amplitude) | p = 0.08 |
bj | Table 4 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (10–90 rise) | p = 0.0008 |
bk | Table 4 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (10–90 slope) | p = 0.02 |
bl | Table 4 | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (decay) | p = 0.9 |
bm | Fig. 7A | Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test | p = 0.1 |
bn | Fig. 7B | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.04 |
bo | Fig. 7C1 | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (time) | F(11,311) = 4.0; p < 0.0001 |
bp | Fig. 7C1 | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (treatment) | F(1,311) = 5.4; p = 0.02 |
bq | Fig. 7C2 | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.6 |
br | Fig. 7C3 | Two-tailed unpaired t test | p = 0.047 |
bs | Table 5 | Two-tailed Pearson correlation coefficient | As indicated |
bt | Table 6 | Two-tailed Pearson correlation coefficient | As indicated |