Statistical table
| Data structure | Type of test | Power (α = 0.05) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (Figs. 1I, 2G) | Normality assumed (Levene’s test p = 0.118) | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons post hoc | 0.9403 | PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 0.004; PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirBfl/fl Cre+, p = 0.041; PirBfl/fl Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000 |
| b (Figs. 1J and 2H) | Normality assumed (Levene’s test p = 0.233) | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons post hoc | 0.9733 | PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 0.002; PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirBfl/fl Cre+, p = 0.02; PirBfl/fl Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000 |
| c (Fig. 1K) | Normal distribution | Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures | 0.2383 | 0.2443 |
| d (Fig. 1L) | Normal distribution | Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures | 0.9534 | 0.0574 |
| e (Fig. 2K) | Normal distribution | Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures | 0.0501 | 0.8864 |
| f (Fig. 2L) | Normal distribution | Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures | 0.0521 | 0.7799 |
| g (Fig. 3C) | Normality assumed (Levene’s test p = 0.494) | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons post hoc | 0.9988 | PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirBfl/fl Cre+, p = 0.924; PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000; PirBfl/fl Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000; P23 PirB+/+ vs P30 PirB+/+, p = 0.004; P23 PirBfl/fl vs P30 PirBfl/fl, p = 0.19; P23 PirB−/− vs P30 PirB−/−, p = 1.00 |
| h (Fig. 4G) | Normality not assumed | Mann–Whitney | 0.8509 | 0.0058 |
| i (Fig. 4I) | Normality not assumed | Mann–Whitney | 0.1634 | 0.3286 |
| j (Fig. 4K) | Normality not assumed | Mann–Whitney | 0.0961 | 0.4940 |
| k (Fig. 4M) | Normality not assumed | Mann–Whitney | 0.1855 | 0.3918 |
| l (Fig. 5E) | Normality not assumed | Wilcoxon signed-rank | 0.9959 | 0.0060 |
| m (Fig. 5F) | Normality not assumed | Wilcoxon signed-rank | 0.1109 | 0.7722 |
| n (Fig. 6C) | Normality assumed (Levene’s test p = 0.869) | One-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post hoc | 0.1347 | PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirBfl/fl Cre+, p = 1.000; PirB+/+ Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000; PirBfl/fl Cre+ vs PirB−/− Cre+, p = 1.000 |