Amplitude differences of odorant isotopologues from distinct batches and sources
| Odorant (from Table 3) | Mean amplitude | n | Δ Amplitude | p (t test) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h-1-HEL (Lluch Essence) | 11.9367 ± 0.6336 | 7 | 0.5841 ± 0.094 | <8 × 10−4 |
| d13-1-HEL (X421P8) | 11.3525 ± 0.6546 | |||
| h-BNZ (Fluka Analytical) | 5.6187 ± 0.1380 | 8 | −0.6275 ± 0.08 | <1 × 10−4 |
| d6-BNZ (X261P20) | 6.2462 ± 0.1642 | |||
| h-ACP (Puriss grade, Fluka Analytical) | 6.0601 ± 0.4386 | 10 | 0.3103 ± 0.062 | <7.1 × 10−4 |
| d8-ACP (G466P32) | 5.7498 ± 0.4073 |
Mean amplitudes ± SEMs of HEL, BNZ, and ACP isotopologue pairs distinct from those in Figures 1 and 2 derived from the indicated (n) animals are shown. Isotopologue pairs were used at the 10−2 dilution. The probability that the mean amplitudes evoked by the two isotopologues are significantly different is shown per odorant.