Table 1.

Parameter estimates obtained with our method (in bold type) compared with published estimates obtained in similar experimental preparations

ParameterAverage ± SDRangePreparationTemperature (°C)MethodReference
Embedded Image 2–77Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
8.1 ± 5.33–18Rat HC, CA134H, QMLE Larkman et al. (1997)
5.1 ± 2.72.3–11.1Rat SC, L4 spiny stellar to L2/3 pyramidal35–37MV Silver et al. (2003)
N7.48 ± 7.112–22Rat VC and SC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
12.21 ± 7.92–32Cat VC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
53.3 ± 427–170Rat SC, L5 to L535LS Loebel et al. (2009)
3.4 ± 2.21–7Rat VC, L5 to L523–26/36MV, H Hardingham et al. (2010)
Embedded Image 0.06–0.32Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
0.131 ± 0.1450.084–0.197Rat HC, CA134H, QMLE Larkman et al. (1991)
0.196 ± 0.0620.066–0.275Rat HC, CA134H, QMLE Larkman et al. (1997)
q [mV]0.15 ± 0.09Rat SC, L4 spiny stellar to L2/3 pyramidal35–37MV Silver et al. (2003)
0.37 ± 0.170.15–1Rat VC and SC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
0.22 ± 0.190.07–1Cat VC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
0.13 ± 0.040.06–0.25Rat SC, L5 to L535LS Loebel et al. (2009)
0.211 ± 0.0650.106–0.302Rat VC, L5 to L523–26/36MV, H Hardingham et al. (2010)
Embedded Image 0.00–0.31Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
σq [mV]0.052 ± 0.0850.030–0.10Rat HC, CA134H, QMLE Larkman et al. (1991)
0.065 ± 0.15Rat SC, L4 spiny stellar to L2/3 pyramidal35–37MV Silver et al. (2003)
Embedded Image 0.05–0.73Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
0.53 ± 0.170.14–0.81Rat HC, CA134H, QMLE Larkman et al. (1997)
Embedded Image Rat SC, L5 to L532–34LS Markram et al. (1998)
Embedded Image Rat SC, L5 to L532–34LS Markram et al. (1998)
0.79 ± 0.12Rat SC, L4 spiny stellar to L2/3 pyramidal35–37MV Silver et al. (2003)
U0.46 ± 0.26*0.15–0.95Rat SC, L2/3 to L2/335OQA Koester and Johnston (2005)
0.27 ± 0.150.03–0.6Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34LS Wang et al. (2006)
0.63 ± 0.6Rat VC and SC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
0.69 ± 0.18Cat VC, various layers35–36MV, FA Brémaud et al. (2007)
0.46 ± 0.10.25–0.65Rat SC, L5 to L535LS Loebel et al. (2009)
0.46 ± 0.210.15–0.75Rat VC, L5 to L523–26/36MV, H Hardingham et al. (2010)
0.53 ± 0.05Rat VC, L5 to L532–34Bayesian Costa et al. (2013)
Embedded Image 16–1800Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
Embedded Image Rat SC, L5 to L532–34LS Markram et al. (1998)
τD [ms]399 ± 295‡Rat SC, L5 to L532–34LS Markram et al. (1998)
396 ± 1630–1600Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34LS Wang et al. (2006)
525 ± 134380–900Rat SC, L5 to L535LS Loebel et al. (2009)
Embedded Image 0–1900Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34MLE
τF [ms]1797 ± 1247‡Rat SC, L5 to L532–34LS Markram et al. (1998)
292 ± 2400–1600Ferret mPFC, L5 to L532–34LS Wang et al. (2006)
  • The last three columns display the temperature at which recordings were taken, the estimation methods, and the reference to the corresponding study, respectively. All synaptic connection are pyramidal to pyramidal, unless stated otherwise. HC, Hippocampus; VC, visual cortex; SC, somato-sensory cortex; L, layer; MV, mean-variance analysis; QMLE, quantal maximum likelihood; LS, least-squares fit; H, histogram; FA, failure analysis; OQA, optical quantal analysis.

  • *Release probability per connection; †dominantly depressing connections; ‡dominantly facilitating connections.