Statistical table
| Fig. | Description | Data structure | Test | Factor | Degrees of freedom | Statistics value | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 1C | Discrimination index | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Novelty condition × data type interaction | 1,72 | F = 4.568 | 0.036 |
| Novelty condition | 1, 72 | F = 5.289 | 0.024 | |||||
| Data type | 1, 72 | F = 9.430 | 0.003 | |||||
| Discrimination index in Session 2 of all conditions | Normal distribution | Repeated measures ANOVA | Novelty condition | 3, 21 | F = 4.175 | 0.018 Post hoc: NO+NL vs F, p = 0.020; NL vs F, p = 0.108; NO vs F, p = 0.299; NO+NL vs NL, p = 0.223; NO+NL vs NO, p = 0.037 | ||
| Discrimination index in control sessions | Normal distribution | Repeated-measures ANOVA | Novelty condition | 3, 21 | F = 1.809 | 0.176 | ||
| Discrimination index in NO+NL condition | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Data type | 9 | t = 4.751 | 0.001 | ||
| Discrimination index in NL condition | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Data type | 7 | t = 1.345 | 0.221 | ||
| Discrimination index in NO condition | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Data type | 9 | t = 1.259 | 0.240 | ||
| Discrimination index in F condition | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Data type | 9 | t = 0.393 | 0.703 | ||
| b | 1D | Exploration time in Session 1 | Normal distribution | Repeated-measures ANOVA | Novelty condition | 3,21 | F = 1.216 | 0.329 |
| c | 2D,3D | Hippocampal gamma power change over running speed in novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Running speed | 1,5450 | F = 2.609 | 0.106 |
| Brain region | 1,5450 | F = 85.640 | <0.001 | |||||
| Object–place pairing type | 1,5450 | F = 99.128 | <0.001 | |||||
| Gamma type | 1,5450 | F = 66.361 | <0.001 | |||||
| Hippocampal gamma power change in novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,164 | F = 3.984 | 0.048 | ||
| Object–place pairing type | 1,164 | F = 7.500 | 0.007 | |||||
| Gamma type | 1,164 | F = 3.938 | 0.049 | |||||
| d | 2D | CA1 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,104 | F = 11.953 | 0.001 |
| CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.021; Object A: p = 0.109; Slow gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.754; Object A: p = 0.754 | |||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,36 | F = 6.941 | 0.012 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.011; Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.791 | ||
| CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object A’: p =0.008; Object A: p =0.289; Slow gamma power change: Object A’: p =1.000; Object A: p = 0.289 | |||
| CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,28 | F = 6.109 | 0.020 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.169; Slow gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.226 | ||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object B: p = 0.109; Object A: p = 0.109; Slow gamma power change: Object B: p = 0.754; Object A: p = 0.754 | |||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Object–place pairing type | 1,36 | F = 1.406 | 0.243 | ||
| Gamma type | 1,36 | F = 3.174 | 0.083 | |||||
| Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,36 | F = 0.054 | 0.817 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.090; Slow gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.025 | |||||
| CA1 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,104 | F = 5.087 | 0.026 | ||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.021; Object A: p = 0.344; Slow gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.344; Object A: p = 1.000 | |||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,36 | F = 3.953 | 0.054 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.016; Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.354 | ||
| CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,28 | F = 4.241 | 0.049 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.060; Slow gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.806 | ||
| CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Object–place pairing type | 1,36 | F = 0.527 | 0.473 | ||
| Gamma type | 1,36 | F = 0.068 | 0.796 | |||||
| Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,36 | F = 0.107 | 0.745 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.129; Slow gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.224 | |||||
| e | 3D | CA3 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.219; Object A: p = 0. 219; Slow gamma power change: Object C: p = 0.219; Object A: p = 1.000 | |
| CA3 gamma power change between NL and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object A’: p = 0.625; Object A: p = 0.625; Slow gamma power change: Object A’: p = 0.625; Object A: p = 0.625 | |||
| CA3 gamma power change between NO and F conditions | Binomial distribution | Binomial test | N/A | N/A | Fast gamma power change: Object B: p = 0.219; Object A: p = 0.688; Slow gamma power change: Object B: p = 0.688; Object A: p = 1.000 | |||
| CA3 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,56 | F = 1.138 | 0.291 | ||
| Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,56 | F = 1.161 | 0.286 | |||||
| Novelty condition | 1,56 | F = 0.266 | 0.608 | |||||
| Object–place pairing type | 1,56 | F = 0.984 | 0.325 | |||||
| Gamma type | 1,56 | F = 0.520 | 0.474 | |||||
| CA3 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type | 1,20 | F = 1.045 | 0.319 Post hoc: Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.372; Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.589 | ||
| f | 4 | Gamma phase synchrony change between novel and familiar object–place pairings | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × gamma type | 1,40 | F = 11.005 | 0.002 |
| Gamma phase synchrony difference (C–A) | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Gamma type | 5 | t = 4.316 | 0.008 | ||
| Gamma phase synchrony difference (A’–A) | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Gamma type | 3 | t = 0.420 | 0.703 | ||
| Gamma phase synchrony difference (B–A) | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Gamma type | 5 | t = 1.707 | 0.148 | ||
| g | 5 | Mean vector length of gamma phase distributions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × cell type × gamma type | 1,398 | F = 3.980 | 0.047 |
| 5A | Mean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NO+NL condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,110 | F = 4.812 | 0.030 Post hoc: Fast gamma: cells A vs cells C, p = 0.008; Slow gamma: cells A vs cells C, p = 0.928 | |
| 5B | Mean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NL condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,100 | F = 4.136 | 0.045 Post hoc: Fast gamma: cells A vs cells A’, p = 0.159; Slow gamma: cells A vs cells A’, p = 0.428 | |
| 5C | Mean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NO condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,132 | F = 0.416 | 0.520 Post hoc: Fast gamma: cells A vs cells B, p = 0.049; Slow gamma: cells A vs cells B, p = 0.163 | |
| h | 6D | Place cell in-field firing rates in all novel conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × cell type × gamma type | 1,146 | F = 0.549 | 0.460 |
| Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,146 | F = 4.538 | 0.035 | |||||
| Place cell in-field firing rates in NO+NL condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,56 | F = 4.507 | 0.038 Post hoc (sign test): Cell C: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.039; Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.238 | ||
| Place cell in-field firing rates in NL condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell ype × gamma type | 1,38 | F = 33.532 | <0.001 Post hoc (sign test): Cell A’: slow vs fast gamma, p < 0.008; Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.092 | ||
| Place cell in-field firing rates in NO condition | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: cell type × gamma type | 1,48 | F = 1.322 | 0.256 | ||
| Cell type | 1,48 | F = 0.015 | 0.902 | |||||
| Gamma type | 1,48 | F = 0.005 | 0.942 | |||||
| i | 6E | Place cell in-field firing rates in NO+NL condition (gamma detected by non-local EEG) | Normal distribution | Sign test | Gamma type | N/A | N/A | Cell C: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.039; Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.481 |
| Place cell in-field firing rates in NL condition (gamma detected by non-local EEG) | Normal distribution | Sign test | Gamma type | N/A | N/A | Cell A’: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.070; Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.267 | ||
| j | 7D,E | Hippocampal theta power change between novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type | 1,80 | F = 0.001 | 0.976 |
| 7D | CA1 theta power change between novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type | 1,52 | F = 3.410 | 0.070 | |
| CA1 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 9 | t = 1.317 | 0.220 | ||
| CA1 theta power change between NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 7 | t = 1.986 | 0.087 | ||
| CA1 theta power change between NO and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 9 | t = 0.041 | 0.968 | ||
| 7E | CA3 theta power change between novel and familiar conditions | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type | 1,28 | F = 0.650 | 0.427 | |
| CA3 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 5 | t = 1.934 | 0.111 | ||
| CA3 theta power change between NL and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 3 | t = 1.109 | 0.348 | ||
| CA3 theta power change between NO and F conditions | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 5 | t = 1.849 | 0.124 | ||
| N/A | Hippocampal theta power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type | 1,80 | F = 0.049 | 0.825 | |
| CA1 theta power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Generalized linear mixed models | Interaction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type | 1,52 | F = 0.013 | 0.910 | ||
| CA1 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 9 | t = 1.287 | 0.230 | ||
| CA1 theta power change between NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 7 | t = 2.040 | 0.081 | ||
| CA1 theta power change between NO and F conditions, using stricter criterion of exploration | Normal distribution | Paired t test | Object–place pairing type | 9 | t = 0.793 | 0.448 | ||
| k | 7F | Theta phase synchrony change between novel and familiar object–place pairings | Normal distribution | Repeated-measures ANOVA | Novelty condition | 3,9 | F = 2.484 | 0.127 |
| l | 7G | Mean vector length of theta phase distributions | Normal distribution | Two-way ANOVA | Interaction: novelty condition × cell type | 2,195 | F = 3.085 | 0.048 |
| Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NO+NL condition | Normal distribution | t test | cell type | 55 | t = 2.192 | 0.033 | ||
| Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NL condition | Normal distribution | t test | cell type | 50 | t = 0.808 | 0.423 | ||
| Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NO condition | Normal distribution | t test | cell type | 66 | t = 0.966 | 0.338 | ||