Table 1:

Statistical table

Fig.DescriptionData structureTestFactorDegrees of freedomStatistics valuep value
a 1CDiscrimination indexNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsNovelty condition × data type interaction1,72F = 4.5680.036
Novelty condition1, 72F = 5.2890.024
Data type1, 72F = 9.4300.003
Discrimination index in Session 2 of all conditionsNormal distributionRepeated measures ANOVANovelty condition3, 21F = 4.1750.018
Post hoc:
NO+NL vs F, p = 0.020;
NL vs F, p = 0.108;
NO vs F, p = 0.299;
NO+NL vs NL, p = 0.223;
NO+NL vs NO, p = 0.037
Discrimination index in control sessionsNormal distributionRepeated-measures ANOVANovelty condition3, 21F = 1.8090.176
Discrimination index in NO+NL conditionNormal distributionPaired t testData type9t = 4.7510.001
Discrimination index in NL conditionNormal distributionPaired t testData type7t = 1.3450.221
Discrimination index in NO conditionNormal distributionPaired t testData type9t = 1.2590.240
Discrimination index in F conditionNormal distributionPaired t testData type9t = 0.3930.703
b 1DExploration time in Session 1Normal distributionRepeated-measures ANOVANovelty condition3,21F = 1.2160.329
c 2D,3DHippocampal gamma power change over running speed in novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsRunning speed1,5450F = 2.6090.106
Brain region1,5450F = 85.640<0.001
Object–place pairing type1,5450F = 99.128<0.001
Gamma type1,5450F = 66.361<0.001
Hippocampal gamma power change in novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type1,164F = 3.9840.048
Object–place pairing type1,164F = 7.5000.007
Gamma type1,164F = 3.9380.049
d 2DCA1 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type1,104F = 11.9530.001
CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.021;
Object A: p = 0.109;
Slow gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.754;
Object A: p = 0.754
CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,36F = 6.9410.012
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.011;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.791
CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object A’: p =0.008;
Object A: p =0.289;
Slow gamma power change:
Object A’: p =1.000;
Object A: p = 0.289
CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,28F = 6.1090.020
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.169;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.226
CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object B: p = 0.109;
Object A: p = 0.109;
Slow gamma power change:
Object B: p = 0.754;
Object A: p = 0.754
CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsObject–place pairing type1,36F = 1.4060.243
Gamma type1,36F = 3.1740.083
Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,36F = 0.0540.817
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.090;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.025
CA1 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type1,104F = 5.0870.026
CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.021;
Object A: p = 0.344;
Slow gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.344;
Object A: p = 1.000
CA1 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,36F = 3.9530.054
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.016;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.354
CA1 gamma power change between NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,28F = 4.2410.049
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.060;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs A’, p = 0.806
CA1 gamma power change between NO and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsObject–place pairing type1,36F = 0.5270.473
Gamma type1,36F = 0.0680.796
Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,36F = 0.1070.745
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.129;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs B, p = 0.224
e 3DCA3 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.219;
Object A: p = 0. 219;
Slow gamma power change:
Object C: p = 0.219;
Object A: p = 1.000
CA3 gamma power change between NL and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object A’: p = 0.625;
Object A: p = 0.625;
Slow gamma power change:
Object A’: p = 0.625;
Object A: p = 0.625
CA3 gamma power change between NO and F conditionsBinomial distributionBinomial testN/AN/AFast gamma power change:
Object B: p = 0.219;
Object A: p = 0.688;
Slow gamma power change:
Object B: p = 0.688;
Object A: p = 1.000
CA3 gamma power change between novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type × gamma type1,56F = 1.1380.291
Interaction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,56F = 1.1610.286
Novelty condition1,56F = 0.2660.608
Object–place pairing type1,56F = 0.9840.325
Gamma type1,56F = 0.5200.474
CA3 gamma power change between NO+NL and F conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: object–place pairing type × gamma type1,20F = 1.0450.319
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.372;
Slow gamma: Obj A vs C, p = 0.589
f 4Gamma phase synchrony change between novel and familiar object–place pairingsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × gamma type1,40F = 11.0050.002
Gamma phase synchrony difference (C–A)Normal distributionPaired t testGamma type5t = 4.3160.008
Gamma phase synchrony difference (A’–A)Normal distributionPaired t testGamma type3t = 0.4200.703
Gamma phase synchrony difference (B–A)Normal distributionPaired t testGamma type5t = 1.7070.148
g 5Mean vector length of gamma phase distributionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × cell type × gamma type1,398F = 3.9800.047
5AMean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NO+NL conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell type × gamma type1,110F = 4.8120.030
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: cells A vs cells C, p = 0.008;
Slow gamma: cells A vs cells C, p = 0.928
5BMean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NL conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell type × gamma type1,100F = 4.1360.045
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: cells A vs cells A’, p = 0.159;
Slow gamma: cells A vs cells A’, p = 0.428
5CMean vector length of gamma phase distributions in NO conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell type × gamma type1,132F = 0.4160.520
Post hoc:
Fast gamma: cells A vs cells B, p = 0.049;
Slow gamma: cells A vs cells B, p = 0.163
h 6DPlace cell in-field firing rates in all novel conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × cell type × gamma type1,146F = 0.5490.460
Interaction: cell type × gamma type1,146F = 4.5380.035
Place cell in-field firing rates in NO+NL conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell type × gamma type1,56F = 4.5070.038
Post hoc (sign test):
Cell C: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.039;
Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.238
Place cell in-field firing rates in NL conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell ype × gamma type1,38F = 33.532<0.001
Post hoc (sign test):
Cell A’: slow vs fast gamma, p < 0.008;
Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.092
Place cell in-field firing rates in NO conditionNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: cell type × gamma type1,48F = 1.3220.256
Cell type1,48F = 0.0150.902
Gamma type1,48F = 0.0050.942
i 6EPlace cell in-field firing rates in NO+NL condition (gamma detected by non-local EEG)Normal distributionSign testGamma typeN/AN/ACell C: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.039;
Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.481
Place cell in-field firing rates in NL condition (gamma detected by non-local EEG)Normal distributionSign testGamma typeN/AN/ACell A’: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.070;
Cell A: slow vs fast gamma, p = 0.267
j 7D,EHippocampal theta power change between novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type1,80F = 0.0010.976
7DCA1 theta power change between novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type1,52F = 3.4100.070
CA1 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type9t = 1.3170.220
CA1 theta power change between NL and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type7t = 1.9860.087
CA1 theta power change between NO and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type9t = 0.0410.968
7ECA3 theta power change between novel and familiar conditionsNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type1,28F = 0.6500.427
CA3 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type5t = 1.9340.111
CA3 theta power change between NL and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type3t = 1.1090.348
CA3 theta power change between NO and F conditionsNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type5t = 1.8490.124
N/AHippocampal theta power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: brain region × novelty condition × object–place pairing type1,80F = 0.0490.825
CA1 theta power change between novel and familiar conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionGeneralized linear mixed modelsInteraction: novelty condition × object–place pairing type1,52F = 0.0130.910
CA1 theta power change between NO+NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type9t = 1.2870.230
CA1 theta power change between NL and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type7t = 2.0400.081
CA1 theta power change between NO and F conditions, using stricter criterion of explorationNormal distributionPaired t testObject–place pairing type9t = 0.7930.448
k7FTheta phase synchrony change between novel and familiar object–place pairingsNormal distributionRepeated-measures ANOVANovelty condition3,9F = 2.4840.127
l7GMean vector length of theta phase distributionsNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVAInteraction: novelty condition × cell type2,195F = 3.0850.048
Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NO+NL conditionNormal distributiont testcell type55t = 2.1920.033
Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NL conditionNormal distributiont testcell type50t = 0.8080.423
Mean vector length of theta phase distributions in NO conditionNormal distributiont testcell type66t = 0.9660.338