Table 1.

Statistical table

ComparisonData structureType of testObserved power
aClassification accuracy: self-report; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.9620045
bClassification accuracy: right postcentral gyrus; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.9565211
cClassification accuracy: insula; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.8235641
dClassification accuracy: medial OFC; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.5337574
eClassification accuracy: inferior frontal operculum; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.5378919
fClassification accuracy: fusiform gyrus; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.7418888
gClassification accuracy (objective labels): amygdala; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.3522203*
hClassification accuracy (objective labels): posterior STS; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.4092183*
iClassification accuracy (objective labels): postcentral gyrus; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.0789112*
jClassification accuracy (objective labels): insula; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.6379089*
kClassification accuracy (objective labels): medial OFC; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.130852*
lClassification accuracy (objective labels): inferior frontal operculum; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.7368259*
mClassification accuracy (objective labels): fusiform gyrus; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.0578589*
nClassification accuracy (objective labels): amygdala; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.0532535*
oClassification accuracy (objective labels): posterior STS; facial vs vocalBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.0535096*
pClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs insulaBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.1202871*
qClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs medial OFCBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.1961514*
rClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs IFOBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.4217805*
sClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs fusiform gyrusBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.5747844*
tClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs amygdalaBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.6903970*
uClassification accuracy (objective labels): right postcentral gyrus vs posterior STSBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.8736939*
vClassification accuracy (objective labels): right vs left postcentral gyrusBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.6693379
wPLS regression coefficients (objective labels): upper vs lower face emotionsNormalOne-sample t test0.9999976
xPLS regression coefficients (objective labels): upper vs lower face emotionsNormalOne-sample t test1.0000000
yClassification accuracy (objective labels): self-report against right postcentral gyrusBinomialCorrelation (Pearson)0.9092103
zClassification accuracy (subjective labels): right postcentral gyrusBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.9974600
aaClassification accuracy: objective vs subjective labels, right postcentral gyrusBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (paired)0.0500000
bbPLS regression coefficients: objective against subjective modelsBinomialOne-sample t test (Fisher transformed correlation)0.9999025
ccClassification accuracy: left precentral gyrus; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.0684199
ddClassification accuracy: self-report against left precentral gyrusBinomialCorrelation (Pearson)0.3588166
eeClassification accuracy: postcentral gyrus; average vs chanceBinomialWilcoxon sign-rank test (against constant)0.9830124
ffClassification accuracy: self-report against right precentral gyrusBinomialCorrelation (Pearson)0.2688632

  • Data are assumed to come from the stated distributions. For sign-rank tests, effect sizes are computed as r = z/√n, from which achieved power is calculated. *Effects that were not significant (correcting for multiple comparisons) and were not included in the main text of the paper.