Table 1.

Statistics

Data structureTestExact p value (or estimated n)N
aAnimal morbidityKaplan–Meier curves, one-factor, btw (age)χ20.001 (age)17 y; 17 m; 17 a
bHorizontal BBOne-factor, btw (age)ANOVA0.27 (age)17 y; 17 m; 17 a
cRearingOne-factor, btw (age)ANOVA0.24 (age)17 y; 17 m; 17 a
d% BB in centerOne-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’s0.004 (age) 0.004 (y vs a), 0.027 (y vs m), 0.73 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 17 a
eBarnes maze training (distance)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (trial)ANOVATukey’s0.018 (age), <0.0001 (trial), 0.67 (age × trial) 0.015 (y vs a), 0.15 (y vs m), 0.55 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 16 a
fBarnes maze training (velocity)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (trial)ANOVATukey’s0.044 (age), <0.0001 (trial), 0.006 (age × trial) 0.25 (y vs a), 0.037 (y vs m), 0.64 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 16 a
gBarnes maze probe (bouts; all age groups)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (hole type)ANOVATukey’s0.035 (age), <0.0001 (hole type), 0.053 (age × hole type) Age: 0.047 (y vs a), 0.087 (y vs m), 0.95 (m vs a); Hole type: <0.0001 Target hole: 0.043 (y vs a), 0.13 (y vs m), 0.84 (m vs a) Nontarget hole: 0.77 (y vs a), 0.15 (y vs m), 0.47 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 16 a
hBarnes maze probe (Δ bouts and % BB)Two variables:Δ bouts (at target – average nontarget hole) and % BB in center in aged micePearson’s rp = 0.04616 a
iBarnes maze reversal (distance)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (trial)ANOVA0.77 (age), <0.0001 (trial), 0.14 (age x trial)17 y; 17 m; 16 a
jBarnes maze reversal (velocity)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (trial)ANOVA0.28 (age), 0.0005 (trial), 0.36 (age × trial)17 y; 17 m; 16 a
kFC training (% freezing)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (training phase)ANOVA0.42 (age), <0.0001 (training phase); 0.82 (age × training phase)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
lFC training (motion index)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (time)ANOVA0.65 (age), <0.0001 (time),0.67 (age × time)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
mFC context test (% freezing)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’s0.046 (age) 0.89 (y vs a), 0.12 (y vs m), 0.057 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
nFC cue test (% freezing)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (test phase)ANOVATukey’s0.31 (age), <0.0001 (test phase), 0.030 (age × test phase)Pre CS: 0.72 (y vs a), 0.73 (y vs m), 0.99 (m vs a) During CS: 0.12 (y vs a), 0.24 (y vs m), m vs a (0.88)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
oAcoustic startle(movement intensity)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (stimulus intensity)ANOVATukey’s<0.0001 (age) <0.0001 (stimulus intensity) <0.0001 (age × stimulus intens.)Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.64 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
pAcoustic startle [slope (movement intensity/dB)]One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’sp < 0.0001 (age) Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.12 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)17 y; 17 m; 14 a
qMultimodal AA (D1: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (blocks)ANOVATukey’s<0.0001 (age) <0.0001 (block)<0.0001 (age × block)Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.36 (y vs m), 0.001 (m vs a)8 y; 8 m; 8 a
rMultimodal AA (D2: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (blocks)ANOVATukey’s<0.0001 (age) <0.0001 (block)0.005 (age × block) Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.79 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)8 y; 8 m; 8 a
sMultimodal AA (D1: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’sAge: 0.002 0.007 (y vs a), 0.98 (y vs m), 0.005 (m vs a)8 y; 8 m; 8 a
tMultimodal AA (D2: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’sAge: 0.024 0.023 (y vs a), 0.72 (y vs m), <0.11 (m vs a)8 y; 8 m; 8 a
uVisual AA (D1: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (blocks)ANOVATukey’s0.036 (age) <0.0001 (block) <0.0001 (age × block)Age: 0.029 (y vs a), 0.30 (y vs m), 0.35 (m vs a)9 y; 9 m; 6 a
vVisual AA (D2: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) & win (blocks)ANOVATukey’s0.002 (age) <0.0001 (block)0.74 (age × block) Age: 0.005 (y vs a), 0.98 (y vs m), 0.004 (m vs a)9 y; 9 m; 6 a
wVisual AA (D1: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’sAge: 0.001 0.003 (y vs a), 0.91 (y vs m), 0.001 (m vs a)9 y; 9 m; 6 a
xVisual AA (D2: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVATukey’sAge: 0.809 y; 9 m; 6 a
yMultimodal and visual AA (D1 slope) and % BB in center1 AA and 1 locomotor variable: D1 slope (% AA/block) and % BB in centerPearson’s rp = 0.5414 a
zVisual AA (D1: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (blocks)ANOVA0.92 (age) <0.0001 (block)0.65 (age × block)16 y; 19 a
aaVisual AA (D2: % AA)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (blocks)ANOVA0.099 (age) <0.0001 (block)0.27 (age × block)16 y; 19 a
abVisual AA (D1: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVAAge: 0.3916 y; 19 a
acVisual AA (D2: slope (% AA/block)One-factor, btw (age)ANOVAAge: 0.1516 y; 19 a
adSpatial frequency thresholdOne-factor, btw (age)ANOVAAge: p < 0.000116 y; 20 a
aeContrast sensitivityTwo-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (spatial frequency)ANOVAp < 0.0001 (age) p < 0.0001 (spatial frequency) p < 0.0001 (age × spatial frequency)16 y; 20 a
afVisual AA (D1 slope) and spatial frequency threshold1 AA and 1 spatial frequency variable: D1 slope (% AA/block) and spatial frequency thresholdPearson’s rp = 0.3619 a
agVisual AA (D2 slope) and spatial frequency threshold1 AA and 1 spatial frequency variable: D2 slope (% AA/block) and spatial frequency thresholdPearson’s rp = 0.8519 a
ahVisual AA (D1 slope) and contrast sensitivity at 0.064 c/d1 AA and 1 contrast sensitivity variable: D1 slope (% AA/block) and contrast sensitivity at 0.064 c/dPearson’s rp = 0.7719 a
aiVisual AA (D2 slope) and contrast sensitivity at 0.064 c/d1 AA and 1 contrast sensitivity variable: D2 slope (% AA/block) and contrast sensitivity at 0.064 c/dPearson’s rp = 0.5419 a
aj% of clustered GFAP-positive tissue areaTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVATukey’s0.005 (age) 0.27 (environment)0.71 (age × environment) Age: 0.049 (y vs a), 0.45 (y vs m), 0.003 (m vs a)16 y; 16 m; 10 a
akDensity of GFAP-positive clustersTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVATukey’s0.007 (age) 0.065 (environment)0.67 (age × environment)Age: 0.065 (y vs a), 0.45 (y vs m), 0.005 (m vs a)16 y; 16 m; 10 a
alSize of GFAP-positive clustersTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA0.27 (age) 0.11 (environment)
0.21 (age × environment)
16 y; 15 m; 10 a
amShape factor of GFAP-positive clustersTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA0.35 (age) 0.47 (environment)
0.39 (age × environment)
16 y; 15 m; 10 a
an% of dark CD68-positive tissue areaTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
<0.0001 (age) 0.132 (environment)
0.088 (age × environment)
Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.461 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)
16 y; 16 m; 9 a
aoDensity of CD68-positive dark objectsTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
<0.0001 (age) 0.17 (environment)
0.18 (age × environment)
Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.13 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)
16 y; 16 m; 9 a
apSize of CD68-positive dark objectsTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
<0.0001 (age) 0.12 (environment)
0.75 (age × environment)
Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), 0.79 (y vs m), <0.0001 (m vs a)
16 y; 16 m; 9 a
aqShape factor of CD68-positive dark objectsTwo-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
<0.0001 (age) 0.60 (environment)
0.24 (age × environment)
Age: <0.0001 (y vs a), <0.0001 (y vs m), 0.47 (m vs a)
16 y; 16 m; 9 a
arVisual AA (D1 slope) and % GFAP-positive cluster area1 AA and GFAP measure: D1 slope (% AA/block) and % GFAP-positive cluster areaPearson’s rp = 0.8710 a
asVisual AA (D1 slope) and % CD68-positive dark area1 AA and CD68 measure: D1 slope (% AA/block) and % CD68-positive dark areaPearson’s rp = 0.9010 a
atNumber of c-Fos-positive cells (DG)Two-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
0.001 (age) 0.001 (environment)
0.30 (age × environment)
Age: 0.004 (y vs a), 0.002 (y vs m), 0.97 (m vs a)
Environment: 0.001
17 y; 17 m; 10 a
auNumber of c-Fos-positive cells (isocortex)Two-factor, btw (age and environment)ANOVA
Tukey’s
0.98 (age) <0.0001 (environment)
0.56 (age × environment)
Environment: <0.0001
17 y; 17 m; 10 a
avNumber of c-Fos-positive cells (DG) and % BB in center1 c-Fos and 1 locomotor variable: number of c-Fos-positive cells (DG) and % BB in centerPearson’s rp = 0.4710 a
awI–O relationship (EPSP slope)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (stimulus intensity)ANOVA0.021 (age), <0.0001 (stimulus intensity), <0.0001 (age × stimulus intensity)20 y, 5 y; 30 a, 5 a
axPPR (p2/p1)Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (ISI)ANOVA0.024 (age), <0.0001 (ISI), <0.015 (age × ISI)22 a, 5 a; 30 a, 5 a
ayLTP
(EPSP slope)
Two-factor, mixed-design: btw (age) and win (number of TBSs)ANOVA0.11 (age), <0.0001 (number of TBSs), <0.89 (age × number of TBS)12 y, 5y; 17 a, 5 a
azLTP
(EPSP slope; responses to 1 TBS pulse only)
One-factor, btw design (age)ANOVA0.058 (age)12 y, 5 y;
17 a, 5 a
  • y, Young; m, middle-aged; a, aged; btw, between-factor of the ANOVA; win, within-factor of the ANOVA; N depicts the number of animals, or the number of slices for electrophysiological experiments; D1 and D2 refer to day 1 and day 2 of training or testing, respectively; p2/p1, EPSP slope in response to the second pulse divided by the EPSP slope in response to the first pulse.