Table 5.

Multiple-comparisons following one-way ANOVA and nonparametric test

24 hLPDP
Datan1n2Mean (rank) differencesAdjusted p valueMean rank differencesAdjusted p valueMean rank differencesAdjusted p value
Holm–Sidak's testDunn's testDunn's test
Fig. 8BFemale vs male 100%66−92.420.3864−6.833>0.99996>0.9999
Female vs male 50%67388.2<0.000111.310.302117.790.0065
Female vs male 77%67427.3<0.000112.60.157919.50.0019
Female vs male 33%66435.2<0.000111.830.288719.830.0025
Male 100% vs male 50%67480.6<0.000118.140.005111.790.2393
Male 100% vs male 77%67519.7<0.000119.430.00213.50.0969
Male100% vs male 33%66527.6<0.000118.670.005713.830.1064
Male 50% vs male 77%7739.070.78161.286>0.99991.714>0.9999
Male 50% vs male 33%7646.980.78160.5238>0.99992.048>0.9999
Male 77% vs male 33%767.9050.8861−0.7619>0.99990.3333>0.9999
Dunn's testDunn's testDunn's test
Fig. 8DFemale vs 100% male88−240.1486−44.5<0.0001230.2018
Female vs 4% male8125.667>0.9999-5.5>0.99998.167>0.9999
Female vs 10% male812220.14411.167>0.999939.17<0.0001
Female vs 90% male8123.333>0.9999−22.170.136133.50.0012
Female vs 96% male812-9.667>0.9999-31.830.002723.830.0754
100% male vs 4% male81229.670.007239<0.0001−14.83>0.9999
100% male vs 10% male81246<0.000145.67<0.000116.170.8556
100% male vs 90% male81227.330.019422.330.128510.5>0.9999
100% male vs 96% male81214.33>0.999912.67>0.99990.8333>0.9999
4% male vs 10% male121216.330.47386.667>0.9999310.0007
4% male vs 90% male1212−2.333>0.9999−16.670.424125.330.0128
4% male vs 96% male1212−15.330.6539−26.330.007915.670.5883
10% male vs 90% male1212−18.670.2104−23.330.032-5.667>0.9999
10% male vs 96% male1212−31.670.0005−330.0002−15.330.6539
90% male vs 96% male1212−13>0.9999−9.667>0.9999−9.667>0.9999