Experimental design: random-design
| Data structure | Type of test | Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. 2. gap distances, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. gap distances, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. edge approach, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. edge approach, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. swimming, struggling AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.8000 |
| Fig. 2. swimming, floating AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.9999 |
| Fig. 2. swimming, struggling ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.8507 |
| Fig. 2. swimming, floating ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. sticky paper, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 2. sticky paper, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.9976 |
| Fig. 3. active whisking frequency, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 0.8831 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, type | 1.0000 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 1.0000 | |
| Fig. 3. active whisking frequency, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 1.0000 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, type | 1.0000 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 1.0000 | |
| Fig. 3. object discrimination, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 1.0000 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, trial | 0.8100 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 1.0000 | |
| Fig. 3. object discrimination, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 0.9485 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, trial | 1.0000 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 0.9999 | |
| Fig. 3. texture discrimination, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 1.0000 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, trial | 1.0000 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 1.0000 | |
| Fig. 3. texture discrimination, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, strain | 0.8090 |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, trial | 1.0000 | |
| Normal distribution | Two–way ANOVA, interaction | 0.8470 | |
| Fig. 4. open field locomotion, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.8003 |
| Fig. 4. open field locomotion, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.9649 |
| Fig. 5. social contacts AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.8008 |
| Fig. 5. flight to front approach, AC1KO, WC, and WT | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 5. flight to back approach, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 5. social contacts, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 0.9999 |
| Fig. 5. flight to front approach, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |
| Fig. 5. flight to back approach, ThAC1KO, CxAC1KO, and control | Normal distribution | One–way ANOVA | 1.0000 |