Table 4.

Statistical table

LineFigureComparisonData structureStatistical testPowerp valueF/t value
a5DMix 0 min vs spin 0 minNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.99500.0072t(3.49) =
–5.64
b5DMix 40 min vs spin 40 minNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.83130.0046t(5.23) =
–4.74
c5DMix 75 min vs spin 75 minNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.82510.0103t(7.86) =
–3.35
d6DFSC noise vs <500-nm PSNormal distributionTwo-sided Student’s t test0.67830.0260t(11.29) =
–2.56
e6D<500-nm PS vs <880-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.84870.0085t(11.62) =
3.16
f6D<880-nm sil vs <1300-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.44520.0738t(14.71) =
–1.92
g6D<1300-nm sil vs >1300-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.77610.0124t(14.83) =
2.85
h6EFSC noise vs <500-nm PSNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.69530.0242t(10.95) =
2.61
i6E<500-nm PS vs <880-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.83660.0092t(11.73) =
–3.11
j6E<880-nm sil vs <1300-nm SilNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.44280.0734t(15.73) =
1.92
k6E<1300-nm sil vs >1300-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.74230.0142t(15.54) =
–2.76
l6FFSC noise vs <500-nm PSNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.09110.5286t(2.00) =
0.76
m6F<500-nm PS vs <880-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.99650.0229t(2.00) =
–6.5
n6F<880-nm sil vs <1300-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.23970.2468t(2.01) =
1.62
o6F<1300-nm sil vs >1300-nm silNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.76530.0230t(3.99) =
–3.59
p6-1CPBS vs PBS-SETNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.06660.6775t(14.11) =
0.425
q6-1CPBS-SET vs SETNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.25000.1779t(12.49) =
1.43
r6-1CPBS vs SETNormal distributionTwo-sided Welch’s t test0.54810.0417t(17.44) =
2.20
s6HMain effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.97931.83E-13F(4,125) = 21.40
t6HMain effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.52781.15E-06F(2,125) = 15.29
u6HInteraction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.20300.0043F(8,125) = 2.98
v7B, VGATMain effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.97532.84E-10F(4,50) = 21.21
w7B, VGATMain effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.08150.0610F(1,50) = 3.67
x7B, VGATInteraction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05260.8060F(4,50) = 0.40
y7B, VGLUT1Main effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.9998<2E-16F(4,50) = 68.31
z7B, VGLUT1Main effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05000.724F(1,50) = 0.13
a17B, VGLUT1Interaction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05040.956F(4,50) = 0.16
b17B, VMAT2Main effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.85164.67E-07F(4,50) = 12.35
c17B, VMAT2Main effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.07810.069F(1,50) = 3.46
d17B, VMAT2Interaction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05130.887F(4,50) = 0.28
e17C, single+Main effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.97562.71E-10F(4,50) = 21.27
f17C, single+Main effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.10740.029F(1,50) = 5.06
g17C, single+Interaction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05040.96F(4,50) = 0.16
h17C, double+Main effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.98761.68E-11F(4,50) = 25.33
i17C, double+Main effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.13350.0162F(1,50) = 6.20
j17C, double+Interaction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05300.7857F(4,50) = 0.43
k17C, triple+Main effect; FSC gateNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.68651.69E-05F(4,50) = 8.88
l17C, triple+Main effect; bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05440.255F(1,50) = 1.33
m17C, triple+Interaction: FSC gate × bufferNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.05070.938F(4,50) = 0.20