Table 4.

Differences in FC for homologous ROIs between VRMS, VRAO, and VRMI in HBT signals

ROIsMean ± standard deviationVRMS vs VRAOVRMS vs VRMIVRAO vs VRMI
VRMSVRAOVRMIt valuep value (FDR)t valuep value (FDR)t valuep value (FDR)
LDLPFC0.695 ± 0.2690.751 ± 0.1470.706 ± 0.252−1.5110.196−0.2810.9751.4820.483
RDLPFC0.643 ± 0.2630.534 ± 0.3610.589 ± 0.3592.0950.0831.1360.436−1.2830.513
LS10.758 ± 0.1460.722 ± 0.1790.733 ± 0.1671.5360.1961.1850.436−0.5080.767
RS10.809 ± 0.1210.722 ± 0.1950.738 ± 0.2214.0230.002**2.9900.044*−0.6240.765
LPMSMA0.717 ± 0.1700.643 ± 0.2130.680 ± 0.1773.1690.009**1.6740.335−1.4810.483
RPMSMA0.702 ± 0.1570.613 ± 0.2190.653 ± 0.2143.5740.004**1.8080.335−1.5160.483
LFPA0.653 ± 0.2550.564 ± 0.3530.604 ± 0.3812.4610.044*1.2630.436−0.8640.653
RFPA0.704 ± 0.3000.635 ± 0.3520.672 ± 0.2921.3110.2450.6130.776−1.1350.524
  • “L” represents the left side; “R” represents the right side. VRMS, virtual reality music stimulation; VRAO, virtual reality action observation; VRMI, virtual reality motor imagination; HBT, total hemoglobin; ROIs, brain regions of interest; FDR, false discovery rate; FC, functional connectivity; Only one brain channel in brain regions LM1 and RM1 is not discussed.

  • * 0.01 < p < 0.05.

  • ** 0.001 < p < 0.01.