Table 3.

Differences in FC for homologous ROIs between VRMS, VRAO, and VRMI in HBO signals

ROIsMean ± standard deviationVRMS vs VRAOVRMS vs VRMIVRAO vs VRMI
VRMSVRAOVRMIt valuep value (FDR)t valuep value (FDR)t valuep value (FDR)
LDLPFC0.745 ± 0.1910.782 ± 0.1450.770 ± 0.186−1.1810.405−0.7480.6190.4431.099
RDLPFC0.714 ± 0.2220.632 ± 0.2600.673 ± 0.2782.0950.1031.1990.590−1.0451.003
LS10.761 ± 0.1520.747 ± 0.1510.741 ± 0.1530.6540.7370.9750.6190.2931.101
RS10.806 ± 0.1320.747 ± 0.1830.743 ± 0.2052.2830.0892.5430.0710.1511.101
LPMSMA0.740 ± 0.1460.666 ± 0.1790.681 ± 0.1813.1980.024*2.7250.071−0.5661.099
RPMSMA0.736 ± 0.1450.674 ± 0.1760.689 ± 0.1832.3690.0891.8170.251−0.5481.099
LFPA0.743 ± 0.1510.677 ± 0.2590.718 ± 0.2421.8540.1390.8460.619−1.0981.003
RFPA0.760 ± 0.2030.748 ± 0.1840.780 ± 0.1360.4010.862−0.6880.619−1.4811.003
  • “L” represents the left side; “R” represents the right side. VRMS, virtual reality music stimulation; VRAO, virtual reality action observation; VRMI, virtual reality motor imagination; HBO, oxygenated hemoglobin; ROIs, brain regions of interest; FDR, false discovery rate; FC, functional connectivity; only one brain channel in brain regions LM1 and RM1 is not discussed.

  • * p < 0.05.