Table 2.

Positive and negative daily affect and hypothesized univariate network connectivity

NetworkPositive affectNegative affect
t (95% CI)SES (95% CI)pone-tailedt (95% CI)SES (95% CI)pone-tailed
DMN–DMN0.42 (−0.92 to 1.77)0.63 (−1.37 to 2.63)0.26−0.37 (−1.41 to 0.68)−0.75 (−2.75 to 1.25)0.23
SAL/CO–SAL/CO−0.06 (−1. 67 to 1.55)−0.07 (−2.07 to 1.93)0.49−0.36 (−1.72 to 1.00)−0.58 (−2.58 to 1.42)0.27
FP–FP−0.37 (−1.47 to 0.74)−0.60 (−2.60 to 1.40)0.28−0.73 (−1.95 to 0.50)−1.15 (−3.15 to 0.85)0.13
DAN–DAN−0.30 (−2.00 to 1.40)−0.26 (−2.03 to 1.52)0.40−0.69 (−2.05 to 0.67)−0.83 (−2.48 to 0.82)0.21
VIS–VIS−0.68 (−2.74 to 1.38)−0.75 (−2.84 to 1.34)0.220.00 (−1.75 to 1.75)0.02 (−2.01 to 2.04)0.50
SUBCTX–DMN−0.02 (−1.26 to 1.21)0.01 (−1.99 to 2.01)0.500.08 (−0.89 to 1.06)0.23 (−1.77 to 2.23)0.42
SUBCTX–SAL/CO−0.05 (−1.04 to 0.95)−0.13 (−2.13 to 1.87)0.46−0.65 (−1.63 to 0.32)−1.37 (−3.37 to 0.63)0.10
  • Positive and negative daily affect in relation to hypothesized univariate network connectivity patterns. Network-level SES statistics were calculated as the difference between the network-level observed effect and the mean of the network-level permuted null, over the standard deviation of the network-level permuted null. t, network-level t-statistic calculated by averaging t-statistics across network edges; SES, standardized effect size; pone-tailed, one-tailed uncorrected probability value following 1,000 permutations; DMN, default mode network; SAL/CO, salience/cingulo-opercular network; FP, frontoparietal network; DAN, dorsal attention network; VIS, visual network; SUBCTX, amygdala and nucleus accumbens.