Table 3.

Summary of comparable motor tests in Atp1A3 mouse strains

ReferenceActivityBeamRotarodGripSwimStrain
Atp1a3tm1Ling/+Here=6N
Moseley et al., 2007↑=a=↓fBl-Swiss
DeAndrade et al., 2011=↓c=↓c=6N
Atp1a3+/−Ikeda et al., 2013=↑d=f6J
Sugimoto et al., 2014===f6J
Sugimoto et al., 2018=
Atp1a3+/D801YHeree6N
Holm et al., 20166J
Isaksen et al., 20176J
Atp1a3+/I810NKirshenbaum et al., 2011a6N
Kirshenbaum et al., 2013==6N
Kirshenbaum et al., 2014=6N
Kirshenbaum et al., 2015f6N
Atp1a3+/D801NHunanyan et al., 2015==f6J
Hunanyan et al., 2021==6J
Uchitel et al., 2021==6J
Atp1a3+/E815KHelseth et al., 2018b=?g6J
  • This is not a comprehensive list of motor tests performed, but those most relevant for comparison here. An equals sign means no difference from WT. Up and down arrows indicate increases or decreases in performance relative to WT.

  • a Hyperactivity was seen only during the first 20 min.

  • b Hindlimb dragging.

  • c Only females were affected.

  • d There was unusually poor performance of WT given that they had 4 d of habituation.

  • e We saw qualitative differences in wire grip; see text and the more demanding rod hang test.

  • f Observations made during Morris water maze testing. The Morris water maze is used as a test of ability and memory under the implicit assumption that mice will not be abnormally fast. Published observations of swimming performance in this test in Atp1a3 mice are the most nuanced because hyperactive or thigmotaxic swimming can result in longer times to reach the platform. An up arrow in most cases was assigned because of commentary consistent with such a possibility, but please read the source papers for detail.

  • g Special case: the water was 40°C, and mice had paroxysmal spells.