Results of the post hoc Dunn’s tests for TSc and dAT with significant p values in bold
| Comparison between time groups | TSc | dAT |
|---|---|---|
| 0 vs 10 | Z = 1.093; p = 0.274 | Z = 0.124; p = 0.902 |
| 0 vs 70 | Z = 3.134; p = 0.002 | Z = 1.454; p = 0.146 |
| 0 vs 100 | Z = −3.175; p = 0.001* | Z = −3.464; p = 0.001* |
| 0 vs 130 | Z = 3.629; p < 0.001* | Z = 2.928; p = 0.003 |
| 0 vs 160 | Z = 2.577; p = 0.010 | Z = 2.217; p = 0.027 |
| 0 vs 190 | Z = 0.825; p = 0.409 | Z = 1.000; p = 0.317 |
| 0 vs 250 | Z = 0.907; p = 0.364 | Z = 0.031; p = 0.975 |
| 10 vs 70 | Z = −2.041; p = 0.041 | Z = −1.330; p = 0.184 |
| 10 vs 100 | Z = −2.083; p = 0.037 | Z = −3.341; p = 0.001* |
| 10 vs 130 | Z = −2.536; p = 0.011 | Z = −2.804; p = 0.005 |
| 10 vs 160 | Z = −1.485; p = 0.138 | Z = −2.093; p = 0.036 |
| 10 vs 190 | Z = 0.268; p = 0.789 | Z = −0.876; p = 0.381 |
| 10 vs 250 | Z = 0.186; p = 0.853 | Z = 0.093; p = 0.926 |
| 70 vs 100 | Z = −0.041; p = 0.967 | Z = −2.011; p = 0.044 |
| 70 vs 130 | Z = 0.495; p = 0.621 | Z = 1.474; p = 0.140 |
| 70 vs 160 | Z = −0.557; p = 0.578 | Z = 0.763; p = 0.445 |
| 70 vs 190 | Z = −2.309; p = 0.021 | Z = −0.454; p = 0.650 |
| 70 vs 250 | Z = −2.227; p = 0.026 | Z = −1.423; p = 0.155 |
| 100 vs 130 | Z = 0.454; p = 0.650 | Z = −0.536; p = 0.591 |
| 100 vs 160 | Z = −0.598; p = 0.550 | Z = −1.248; p = 0.212 |
| 100 vs 190 | Z = −2.351; p = 0.019 | Z = −2.464; p = 0.014 |
| 100 vs 250 | Z = −2.268; p = 0.023 | Z = −3.433; p = 0.001* |
| 130 vs 160 | Z = 1.052; p = 0.293 | Z = 0.711; p = 0.477 |
| 130 vs 190 | Z = 2.804; p = 0.005 | Z = 1.928; p = 0.054 |
| 130 vs 250 | Z = 2.722; p = 0.006 | Z = 2.897; p = 0.004 |
| 160 vs 190 | Z = 1.753; p = 0.080 | Z = 1.217; p = 0.224 |
| 160 vs 250 | Z = 1.670; p = 0.095 | Z = 2.186; p = 0.029 |
| 190 vs 250 | Z = −0.082; p = 0.934 | Z = 0.969; p = 0.332 |
↵* Significant also after a Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons.