Table 1.

Statistical table

FigureStructureType of testResults
Fig. 1CNormalRM one-way ANOVAPI+: F(2,52.2) = 42.7, p < 0.0001
GCaMP-filled: F(2.58,67) = 18.8, p < 0.0001
Fig. 1D (inset)NormalUnpaired t test (two-tailed)t = 0.037, df = 32, p = 0.97
Fig. 1FNonparametricSpearman's correlationSpearman's ρ = 0.66, p < 0.0001
Extended Data Fig. 1-2CNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,99) = 4.025, p = 0.0002
Depth: F(9,99) = 16.8, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1,11) = 12.3, p = 0.0049
Extended Data Fig. 1-2DNormalUnpaired t test (two-tailed)t = 3.51, df = 11, p = 0.005
Extended Data Fig. 1-2ENormalUnpaired t test (two-tailed)t = 2.76, df = 11, p = 0.02
Extended Data Fig. 1-2FNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,99) = 4.15, p = 0.0001
Depth: F(9,99) = 6.18, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1,11) = 12.3, p = 0.062
Extended Data Fig. 1-2GNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,90) = 2.18, p = 0.034
Depth: F(9,90) = 14.1, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1,10) = 0.041, p = 0.93
Extended Data Fig. 1-3CNormalTwo-way ANOVAInteraction: F(6,87) = 0.3, p = 0.936
Time point: F(3,87) = 9.2, p < 0.0001
Layer: F(2,87) = 2.42, p = 0.095
Extended Data Fig. 1-3DNormalTwo-way ANOVAInteraction: F(6,82) = 0.06, p = 0.99
Time point: F(3,82) = 0.95, p = 0.42
Layer: F(2,82) = 0.78, p = 0.45
Extended Data Fig. 1-4ANormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,351) = 2.04, p = 0.034
Depth: F(9,351) = 129.4, p < 0.0001
Slice thickness: F(1,39) = 1.74, p = 0.125
Extended Data Fig. 1-4BNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,342) = 2.04, p = 0.0007
Depth: F(9,342) = 52.51, p < 0.0001
Slice thickness: F(1,38) = 1.81, p = 0.186
Extended Data Fig. 1-4CNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,216) = 0.08, p = 0.99
Depth: F(9,216) = 91.3, p < 0.0001
Age: F(1,24) = 0.36, p = 0.56
Extended Data Fig. 1-4DNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,306) = 0.87, p = 0.56
Depth: F(9,306) = 54.16, p < 0.0001
Age: F(1,34) = 10.49, p = 0.0027
Fig. 2BNormalRM one-way ANOVAPI+: F(2,52.2) = 42.7, p < 0.0001
Neuropil: F(2,52.2) = 42.7, p < 0.0001
Fig. 2CNonparametricSpearman's correlationSpearman's ρ =0.68, p < 0.0001
Fig. 2ENormalPearson's correlationPearson's r = 0.61, p < 0.0001
Fig. 3BNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(27,198) = 1.578, p = 0.043
Depth: F(9,198) = 107.1, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(3,22) = 2.75, p = 0.07
Fig. 3ENormalOne-way ANOVAPI+: F(3,22) = 3.06, p = 0.049
Dunnett's multiple-comparisons test
0–1 vs 1–2: p = 0.91, 0–1 vs 2–3: p = 0.99
vs 3–5: p = 0.033
GCaMP-filled: F(3,18) = 1.7, p = 0.2
Dunnett's multiple-comparisons test
0–1 vs 1–2: p = 0.97, 0–1 vs 2–3:
p = 0.96
0–1 vs 3–5: p = 0.13
Fig. 5CNonparametricWilcoxon matched pairs testW = 21, p = 0.031
Fig. 5DNonparametricWilcoxon matched pairs testW = 21, p = 0.031
Fig. 5FNonparametricWilcoxon matched pairs testW = 21, p = 0.031
Fig. 5FNonparametricWilcoxon matched pairs testW = 8, p = 0.375
Fig. 6BNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,369) = 3.32, p = 0.0006
Depth: F(9,369) = 48.1, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1,41) = 8.51, p = 0.0057
Fig. 6B (inset)NormalUnpaired t test (two-tailed)t = 3.19, df = 41, p = 0.002
Fig. 6DNormalTwo-way ANOVAInteraction: F(3,34) = 0.97, p = 0.41
Depth: F(3,34) = 4.57, p = 0.0091
Treatment: F(1,34) = 15.4, p = 0.0004
Sidak's multiple-comparisons test
<1 h: p = 0.67, 1–2 h: p = 0.21, 2–3 h: p = 0.023, 3–5 h: p = 0.011
Fig. 6ENormalTwo-way ANOVAInteraction: F(3,33) = 1.4, p = 0.26
Depth: F(3,33) = 0.71, p = 0.55
Treatment: F(1,33) = 14.8, p = 0.0005
Sidak's multiple-comparisons test
<1 h: p = 0.61, 1–2 h: p = 0.75, 2–3 h: p = 0.64, 3–5 h: p = 0.001
Fig. 6FNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,369) = 2.17, p = 0.023
Depth: F(9,369) = 9.09, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1,41) = 4.19, p = 0.047
Fig. 6F (inset)NonparametricMann–Whitney testU = 86, p = 0.002
Fig. 6GNormalTwo-way RM ANOVAInteraction: F(9,369) = 1.46, p = 0.038
Depth: F(9,369) = 23.7, p < 0.0001
Treatment: F(1, 41) = 2.8, p = 0.01
Fig. 6G (inset)NormalUnpaired t test (two-tailed)t = 2.15, df = 41, p = 0.038
Extended Data Fig. 6-1B (right)LognormalOne-way ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test)ANOVA, F(2,30) = 4.65. p = 0.017
Tukey's multiple-comparisons test
aCSF vs MDL, p = 0.033
aCSF vs Cal 2-1, p = 0.046
MDL vs Cal 2-1, p = 0.910
Extended Data Fig. 6-1B (right)LognormalOne-way ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test)ANOVA, F(2,31) = 5.79. p = 0.007
Tukey's multiple-comparisons test
aCSF vs MDL, p = 0.005
aCSF vs Cal 2-1, p = 0.188
MDL vs Cal 2-1, p = 0.179