Table 3.

Statistical table

Manuscript referenceFigureData structureType of testMultiple comparisons correctionDifference in estimated marginal means and 95% confidence intervals
aFig. 2A,CLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: 0.375 [0.004, 0.746]

SAL v. QUIN: −0.0630 [−0.414, 0.353]

bFig. 2B,DLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: −0.162 [−0.486, 0.161]

SAL v. QUIN: −0.006 [0.746, 0.353]

cFig. 3A,CLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: 0.784 [0.066, 1.502]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.392 [−0.342, 1.126]

dFig. 3B,DLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: 0.010 [−0.617, 0.638]

SAL v. QUIN: −0.076 [−0.710, 0.558]

eFig. 4A,CLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: 0.246 [−0.207, 0.700]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.562 [0.081, 1.044]

fFig. 4B,DLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: −0.100 [−0.490, 0.291]

SAL v. QUIN: −0.039 [−0.440, 0.362]

gFig. 5A,CLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: −0.444 [0.858,0.031]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.049 [−0.362, 0.461]

hFig. 5B,DLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: 0.077 [−0.280, 0.434]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.168 [−0.189, 0.526]

iFig. 6A,CLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: −0.076 [−0.168, 0.835]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.062 [−0.093, 0.957]

jFig. 6B,DLog-normalMixed effects modelSidak

SAL v. MUS: −0.076 [−0.673, 0.521]

SAL v. QUIN: 0.432 [−0.211, 1.075]