Table 1.

Statistical table

Description	Manuscript reference	Data structure	Type of test	p value	Effect size (ηp2 ) or Bayes factor (BF₁₀)
Analysis of behavioral accuracy	a1	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.004	ηp2 = 0.357
	a2	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	<0.001	ηp2 = 0.326
	a3	Normally distributed	F test, interaction effect	<0.001	ηp2 = 0.569
	a4	Normally distributed	F test, contrast	<0.001	N.A.
	a5	Normally distributed	F test, contrast	0.003	N.A.
	a6	Normally distributed	F test, contrast	0.001	N.A.
Effect of ROI on adaptation	b	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	<0.001	ηp2 = 0.214
Analysis of adaptation in RSC	c1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.023	BF₁₀ = 2.843
	c2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.004	BF₁₀ = 11.769
	c3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.002	BF₁₀= 25.919
	c4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.032	BF₁₀ = 2.191
	c5	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.030	BF₁₀ = 2.353
	c6	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.464	BF₁₀ = 0.249
Analysis of adaptation in the PHC	d	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.006	BF₁₀ = 8.492
Analysis of adaptation across retrosplenial portions	e1	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.008	ηp2 = 0.120
	e2	Normally distributed	F test, contrast	<0.001	N.A.
	e3	Normally distributed	F test, interaction effect	0.415	ηp2 = 0.050
	e4	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.833	ηp2 = 0.002
Comparing adaptation patterns between cue types, with environment averaged out	f1	Normally distributed	two-sided one-sample t test	0.011	BF₁₀ = 4.799
	f2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.005	BF₁₀ = 10.625
	f3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.007	BF₁₀ = 7.694
	f4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.779	BF₁₀ = 0.141
	f5	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.867	BF₁₀ = 0.120
Comparing adaptation patterns between cue types, in each environment	g1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.035	BF₁₀ = 2.035
	g2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.009	BF₁₀ = 6.474
	g3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.466	BF₁₀ = 0.248
	g4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.636	BF₁₀ = 0.182
	g5	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.029	BF₁₀ = 2.406
	g6	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.034	BF₁₀ = 2.093
	g7	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.778	BF₁₀ = 0.142
	g8	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.856	BF₁₀ = 0.123
Contributions of retrosplenial portions to cue-specific adaptation patterns	h	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.820	ηp2 = 0.029
Comparing adaptation patterns between environments for each cue type	i1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.588	BF₁₀= 0.198
	i2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.009	BF₁₀ = 6.400
	i3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.013	BF₁₀= 4.564
	i4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.008	BF₁₀ = 7.004
Disentangling path length and location in adaptation in the RSC	j1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.125	BF₁₀ = 0.430
	j2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.093	BF₁₀ = 0.525
	j3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.004	BF₁₀ = 12.694
	j4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.034	BF₁₀ = 2.102
Disentangling path length and location in adaptation in the PHC	k1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.324	BF₁₀ = 0.342
	k2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.126	BF₁₀ = 0.739
Comparing DP_rel between location and path length	l	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	<0.001	ηp2 = 0.326
Disentangling location and subjective response in adaptation in the RSC	m1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.454	BF₁₀ = 0.254
	m2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.778	BF₁₀ = 0.143
	m3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.025	BF₁₀ = 2.694
	m4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.023	BF₁₀ = 2.892
Disentangling location and response in adaptation in the PHC	n1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.283	BF₁₀ = 0.383
	n2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.139	BF₁₀ = 0.683
Comparing DP_rel between location and response	o	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	<0.001	ηp2 = 0.500
Disentangling location and temporal distance in adaptation in the RSC	p1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.002	BF₁₀ = 28.206
	p2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.003	BF₁₀ = 15.359
	p3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.128	BF₁₀ = 0.728
	p4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.028	BF₁₀ = 2.488
	p5	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.107	BF₁₀ = 0.841
Disentangling location and temporal distance in adaptation in the PHC	q1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.032	BF₁₀ = 2.186
	q2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.016	BF₁₀ = 3.841
Evaluation of influences of passive movement phase on adaptation	r1	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	<0.001	BF₁₀= 43.706
	r2	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.003	BF₁₀= 13.818
	r3	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.006	BF₁₀ = 8.572
	r4	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.007	BF₁₀ = 7.511
	r5	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.001	BF₁₀ = 31.856
	r6	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.003	BF₁₀ = 17.435
	r7	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.005	BF₁₀ = 9.724
	r8	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.011	BF₁₀= 5.400
	r9	Normally distributed	One-sided one-sample t test	0.007	BF₁₀ = 7.880
Analysis of successful navigation effect	s1	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.001	ηp2 = 0.476
	s2	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.021	ηp2 = 0.248
	s3	Normally distributed	F test, main effect	0.042	ηp2 = 0.201